Computational Boundaries for Escaping Rectangles

Abstract

Ma and Wong [IEEE TCAD '12] introduced and studied the Rectangle Escape problem, motivated by bus escape routing in printed circuit board design. In this problem, we are given an axis-parallel rectangle R, a set 𝒮 of axis-parallel rectangles fully contained in R, and an integer d. The goal is to determine whether each rectangle in 𝒮 can be extended in one of the four axis-parallel directions (up, down, left, or right) to the boundary of R such that no point is covered by more than d extended rectangles. We revisit Rectangle Escape and resolve several open complexity questions.
Ahmadinejad et al. [TCS '17] studied Rectangle Escape and its variants where rectangles are only allowed to be extended in a subset of directions - most notably, in two directions, a variant they termed Bidirectional REP. They showed that the problem is NP-complete when extensions are limited to two adjacent directions and d = 3, but left open the complexity of the case when d = 2. Additionally, the case for two opposite directions remained unresolved for any d ≥ 2. We resolve the first question by showing that Bidirectional REP is NP-complete even when extensions are restricted to two adjacent directions and d = 2. We also settle the complexity of Rectangle Escape with two opposite directions by proving that the problem is NP-complete when d is part of the input but solvable in 𝒪(n log n) time for any constant d. Finally, we consider the special case where all extended rectangles must be disjoint, that is, d = 1. We show an unconditional lower bound of Ω(n log n) with a matching upper bound of 𝒪(n log n) for all variants. This improves upon a sequence of algorithms for the setting with all four directions allowed and d = 1, starting with an 𝒪(n⁶)-time algorithm, later improved to 𝒪(n⁴), and then to O(n³).