Document Open Access Logo

Fast Approximate Counting of Cycles

Authors Keren Censor-Hillel , Tomer Even, Virginia Vassilevska Williams

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.37.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.06 MB
  • 20 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Keren Censor-Hillel
  • Department of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa, Israel
Tomer Even
  • Department of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa, Israel
Virginia Vassilevska Williams
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

Funding

  • Censor-Hillel, Keren: The research is supported in part by the Israel Science Foundation (grant 529/23).
  • Vassilevska Williams, Virginia: Supported by NSF Grant CCF-2330048, BSF Grant 2020356, and a Simons Investigator Award.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable feedback and for identifying a technical issue in a previous version of our paper.

Cite As Get BibTex

Keren Censor-Hillel, Tomer Even, and Virginia Vassilevska Williams. Fast Approximate Counting of Cycles. In 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 297, pp. 37:1-37:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.37

Abstract

We consider the problem of approximate counting of triangles and longer fixed length cycles in directed graphs. For triangles, Tětek [ICALP'22] gave an algorithm that returns a (1±ε)-approximation in Õ(n^ω/t^{ω-2}) time, where t is the unknown number of triangles in the given n node graph and ω < 2.372 is the matrix multiplication exponent. We obtain an improved algorithm whose running time is, within polylogarithmic factors the same as that for multiplying an n× n/t matrix by an n/t × n matrix. We then extend our framework to obtain the first nontrivial (1± ε)-approximation algorithms for the number of h-cycles in a graph, for any constant h ≥ 3. Our running time is Õ(MM(n,n/t^{1/(h-2)},n)), the time to multiply n × n/(t^{1/(h-2)}) by n/(t^{1/(h-2)) × n matrices.
Finally, we show that under popular fine-grained hypotheses, this running time is optimal.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Mathematics of computing → Approximation algorithms
  • Mathematics of computing → Graph algorithms
Keywords
  • Approximate triangle counting
  • Approximate cycle counting Fast matrix multiplication
  • Fast rectangular matrix multiplication

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

References

  1. Amir Abboud, Arturs Backurs, and Virginia Vassilevska Williams. If the current clique algorithms are optimal, so is valiant’s parser. SIAM J. Comput., 47(6):2527-2555, 2018. Google Scholar
  2. Noga Alon, Raphael Yuster, and Uri Zwick. Color-coding. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 42(4):844-856, 1995. Google Scholar
  3. Noga Alon, Raphael Yuster, and Uri Zwick. Finding and counting given length cycles. Algorithmica, 17(3):209-223, 1997. Google Scholar
  4. Arturs Backurs and Christos Tzamos. Improving viterbi is hard: Better runtimes imply faster clique algorithms. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 311-321, 2017. Google Scholar
  5. Ziv Bar-Yossef, Ravi Kumar, and D. Sivakumar. Reductions in streaming algorithms, with an application to counting triangles in graphs. In David Eppstein, editor, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, January 6-8, 2002, San Francisco, CA, USA, pages 623-632. ACM/SIAM, 2002. Google Scholar
  6. Luca Becchetti, Paolo Boldi, Carlos Castillo, and Aristides Gionis. Efficient algorithms for large-scale local triangle counting. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, 4(3):13:1-13:28, 2010. Google Scholar
  7. Amartya Shankha Biswas, Talya Eden, Quanquan C. Liu, Ronitt Rubinfeld, and Slobodan Mitrovic. Massively parallel algorithms for small subgraph counting. In Amit Chakrabarti and Chaitanya Swamy, editors, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques, APPROX/RANDOM 2022, September 19-21, 2022, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA (Virtual Conference), volume 245 of LIPIcs, pages 39:1-39:28. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.39.
  8. Andreas Björklund, Rasmus Pagh, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, and Uri Zwick. Listing triangles. In Javier Esparza, Pierre Fraigniaud, Thore Husfeldt, and Elias Koutsoupias, editors, Automata, Languages, and Programming - 41st International Colloquium, ICALP 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 8-11, 2014, Proceedings, Part I, volume 8572 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 223-234. Springer, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43948-7_19.
  9. Karl Bringmann and Philip Wellnitz. Clique-based lower bounds for parsing tree-adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM), pages 12:1-12:14, 2017. Google Scholar
  10. Luciana S. Buriol, Gereon Frahling, Stefano Leonardi, Alberto Marchetti-Spaccamela, and Christian Sohler. Counting triangles in data streams. In Stijn Vansummeren, editor, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, June 26-28, 2006, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pages 253-262. ACM, 2006. Google Scholar
  11. Keren Censor-Hillel, Dean Leitersdorf, and Elia Turner. Sparse matrix multiplication and triangle listing in the congested clique model. Theoretical Computer Science, 809:45-60, 2020. Google Scholar
  12. Keren Censor-Hillel, Dean Leitersdorf, and David Vulakh. Deterministic near-optimal distributed listing of cliques. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 271-280, 2022. Google Scholar
  13. Yi-Jun Chang, Seth Pettie, Thatchaphol Saranurak, and Hengjie Zhang. Near-optimal distributed triangle enumeration via expander decompositions. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 68(3):1-36, 2021. Google Scholar
  14. Yi-Jun Chang and Thatchaphol Saranurak. Deterministic distributed expander decomposition and routing with applications in distributed derandomization. In Sandy Irani, editor, 61st IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2020, Durham, NC, USA, November 16-19, 2020, pages 377-388. IEEE, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00043.
  15. Artur Czumaj and Christian Konrad. Detecting cliques in congest networks. Distributed Computing, 33(6):533-543, 2020. Google Scholar
  16. Mina Dalirrooyfard, Surya Mathialagan, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, and Yinzhan Xu. Listing cliques from smaller cliques. CoRR, 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15871.
  17. Mina Dalirrooyfard, Thuy-Duong Vuong, and Virginia Vassilevska Williams. Graph pattern detection: Hardness for all induced patterns and faster noninduced cycles. SIAM J. Comput., 50(5):1627-1662, 2021. Google Scholar
  18. Holger Dell, John Lapinskas, and Kitty Meeks. Approximately counting and sampling small witnesses using a colorful decision oracle. SIAM J. Comput., 51(4):849-899, 2022. Google Scholar
  19. Danny Dolev, Christoph Lenzen, and Shir Peled. “tri, tri again”: finding triangles and small subgraphs in a distributed setting. In Distributed Computing: 26th International Symposium, DISC 2012, Salvador, Brazil, October 16-18, 2012. Proceedings 26, pages 195-209. Springer, 2012. Google Scholar
  20. Talya Eden, Nimrod Fiat, Orr Fischer, Fabian Kuhn, and Rotem Oshman. Sublinear-time distributed algorithms for detecting small cliques and even cycles. Distributed Computing, pages 1-28, 2022. Google Scholar
  21. Talya Eden, Amit Levi, Dana Ron, and C Seshadhri. Approximately counting triangles in sublinear time. SIAM Journal on Computing, 46(5):1603-1646, 2017. Google Scholar
  22. Talya Eden, Dana Ron, and Will Rosenbaum. Almost optimal bounds for sublinear-time sampling of k-cliques in bounded arboricity graphs. In Mikolaj Bojanczyk, Emanuela Merelli, and David P. Woodruff, editors, 49th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2022, July 4-8, 2022, Paris, France, volume 229 of LIPIcs, pages 56:1-56:19. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022. Google Scholar
  23. Talya Eden, Dana Ron, and C. Seshadhri. On approximating the number of k-cliques in sublinear time. In Ilias Diakonikolas, David Kempe, and Monika Henzinger, editors, Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2018, Los Angeles, CA, USA, June 25-29, 2018, pages 722-734. ACM, 2018. Google Scholar
  24. Mira Gonen, Dana Ron, and Yuval Shavitt. Counting stars and other small subgraphs in sublinear-time. SIAM J. Discret. Math., 25(3):1365-1411, 2011. Google Scholar
  25. Alon Itai and Michael Rodeh. Finding a minimum circuit in a graph. In Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 1-10, 1977. Google Scholar
  26. Taisuke Izumi and François Le Gall. Triangle finding and listing in congest networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 381-389, 2017. Google Scholar
  27. Hossein Jowhari and Mohammad Ghodsi. New streaming algorithms for counting triangles in graphs. In Lusheng Wang, editor, Computing and Combinatorics, 11th Annual International Conference, COCOON 2005, Kunming, China, August 16-29, 2005, Proceedings, volume 3595 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 710-716. Springer, 2005. Google Scholar
  28. Daniel M. Kane, Kurt Mehlhorn, Thomas Sauerwald, and He Sun. Counting arbitrary subgraphs in data streams. In Artur Czumaj, Kurt Mehlhorn, Andrew M. Pitts, and Roger Wattenhofer, editors, Automata, Languages, and Programming - 39th International Colloquium, ICALP 2012, Warwick, UK, July 9-13, 2012, Proceedings, Part II, volume 7392 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 598-609. Springer, 2012. Google Scholar
  29. Tamara G. Kolda, Ali Pinar, Todd D. Plantenga, C. Seshadhri, and Christine Task. Counting triangles in massive graphs with mapreduce. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 36(5), 2014. Google Scholar
  30. Jaroslav Nešetřil and Svatopluk Poljak. On the complexity of the subgraph problem. Comment. Math. Univ. Carol., 26(2):415-419, 1985. Google Scholar
  31. Mihai Puatracscu. Towards polynomial lower bounds for dynamic problems. In Leonard J. Schulman, editor, Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2010, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 5-8 June 2010, pages 603-610. ACM, 2010. Google Scholar
  32. Kanat Tangwongsan, A. Pavan, and Srikanta Tirthapura. Parallel triangle counting in massive streaming graphs. In Qi He, Arun Iyengar, Wolfgang Nejdl, Jian Pei, and Rajeev Rastogi, editors, 22nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM'13, San Francisco, CA, USA, October 27 - November 1, 2013, pages 781-786. ACM, 2013. Google Scholar
  33. Jakub Tětek. Approximate triangle counting via sampling and fast matrix multiplication. In 49th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2022). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022. Google Scholar
  34. Virginia Vassilevska Williams and R. Ryan Williams. Subcubic equivalences between path, matrix, and triangle problems. J. ACM, 65(5):27:1-27:38, 2018. Google Scholar
  35. Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Yinzhan Xu, Zixuan Xu, and Renfei Zhou. New bounds for matrix multiplication: from alpha to omega. In Proc. SODA, page to appear, 2024. Google Scholar
  36. Raphael Yuster and Uri Zwick. Finding even cycles even faster. SIAM J. Discret. Math., 10(2):209-222, 1997. Google Scholar
  37. Raphael Yuster and Uri Zwick. Detecting short directed cycles using rectangular matrix multiplication and dynamic programming. In J. Ian Munro, editor, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2004, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, January 11-14, 2004, pages 254-260. SIAM, 2004. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact