From Chinese Postman to Salesman and Beyond: Shortest Tour δ-Covering All Points on All Edges

Authors Fabian Frei , Ahmed Ghazy , Tim A. Hartmann , Florian Hörsch , Dániel Marx



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ISAAC.2024.31.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.8 MB
  • 16 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Fabian Frei
  • CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarbrücken, Germany
Ahmed Ghazy
  • CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarbrücken, Germany
  • Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
Tim A. Hartmann
  • CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarbrücken, Germany
Florian Hörsch
  • CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarbrücken, Germany
Dániel Marx
  • CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarbrücken, Germany

Cite As Get BibTex

Fabian Frei, Ahmed Ghazy, Tim A. Hartmann, Florian Hörsch, and Dániel Marx. From Chinese Postman to Salesman and Beyond: Shortest Tour δ-Covering All Points on All Edges. In 35th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 322, pp. 31:1-31:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2024.31

Abstract

A well-studied continuous model of graphs, introduced by Dearing and Francis [Transportation Science, 1974], considers each edge as a continuous unit-length interval of points. For δ ≥ 0, we introduce the problem δ-Tour, where the objective is to find the shortest tour that comes within a distance of δ of every point on every edge. It can be observed that 0-Tour is essentially equivalent to the Chinese Postman Problem, which is solvable in polynomial time. In contrast, 1/2-Tour is essentially equivalent to the graphic Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), which is NP-hard but admits a constant-factor approximation in polynomial time. We investigate δ-Tour for other values of δ, noting that the problem’s behavior and the insights required to understand it differ significantly across various δ regimes. On the one hand, we first examine the approximability of the problem for every fixed δ > 0:
1) For every fixed 0 < δ < 3/2, the problem δ-Tour admits a constant-factor approximation and is APX-hard, while for every fixed δ ≥ 3/2, the problem admits an O(log n)-approximation in polynomial time and has no polynomial-time o(log n)-approximation, unless P = NP.
Our techniques also yield a new APX-hardness result for graphic TSP on cubic bipartite graphs. When parameterizing by the length of a shortest tour, it is relatively easy to show that 3/2 is the threshold of fixed-parameter tractability:
2) For every fixed 0 < δ < 3/2, the problem δ-Tour is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized by the length of a shortest tour, while it is W[2]-hard for every fixed δ ≥ 3/2.
On the other hand, if δ is considered to be part of the input, then an interesting nontrivial phenomenon appears when δ is a constant fraction of the number of vertices:
3) If δ is part of the input, then the problem can be solved in time f(k)n^O(k), where k = ⌈n/δ⌉; however, assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH), there is no algorithm that solves the problem and runs in time f(k)n^o(k/log k).

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Mathematics of computing → Approximation algorithms
  • Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
Keywords
  • Chinese Postman Problem
  • Traveling Salesman Problem
  • Continuous Graphs
  • Approximation Algorithms
  • Inapproximability
  • Parameterized Complexity

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Esther M. Arkin, Magnús M. Halldórsson, and Refael Hassin. Approximating the tree and tour covers of a graph. Inf. Process. Lett., 47(6):275-282, 1993. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(93)90072-H.
  2. Ramaswamy Chandrasekaran and Arie Tamir. An o((n log p)²) algorithm for the continuous p-center problem on a tree. SIAM J. Algebraic Discret. Methods, 1(4):370-375, 1980. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/0601043.
  3. Nicos Christofides. Worst-case analysis of a new heuristic for the travelling salesman problem. Operations Research Forum, 3(1):20, March 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-021-00101-z.
  4. Perino M. Dearing and Richard Lane Francis. A minimax location problem on a network. Transportation Science, 8(4):333-343, 1974. Google Scholar
  5. Reinhard Diestel. Graph Theory. Springer, 5th edition, 2017. Google Scholar
  6. Irit Dinur and David Steurer. Analytical approach to parallel repetition. In STOC, pages 624-633. ACM, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2591796.2591884.
  7. Lars Engebretsen and Marek Karpinski. Approximation hardness of TSP with bounded metrics. In Fernando Orejas, Paul G. Spirakis, and Jan van Leeuwen, editors, Automata, Languages and Programming, 28th International Colloquium, ICALP 2001, Crete, Greece, July 8-12, 2001, Proceedings, volume 2076 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 201-212. Springer, 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48224-5_17.
  8. Lars Engebretsen and Marek Karpinski. TSP with bounded metrics. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 72(4):509-546, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2005.12.001.
  9. Alexander Grigoriev, Tim A. Hartmann, Stefan Lendl, and Gerhard J. Woeginger. Dispersing obnoxious facilities on a graph. Algorithmica, 83(6):1734-1749, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00453-021-00800-3.
  10. Tim A. Hartmann. Facility location on graphs. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2023-01837.
  11. Tim A. Hartmann and Tom Janßen. Approximating δ-covering (to appear). In Approximation and Online Algorithms - 22nd International Workshop, WAOA 2024, Egham, United Kingdom, September 5-6, 2024, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2024. Google Scholar
  12. Tim A. Hartmann and Stefan Lendl. Dispersing obnoxious facilities on graphs by rounding distances. In Stefan Szeider, Robert Ganian, and Alexandra Silva, editors, Proceeding of the 47th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2022), volume 241 of LIPIcs, pages 55:1-55:14. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPICS.MFCS.2022.55.
  13. Tim A. Hartmann, Stefan Lendl, and Gerhard J. Woeginger. Continuous facility location on graphs. Math. Program., 192(1):207-227, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10107-021-01646-X.
  14. Oded Kariv and S. Louis Hakimi. An algorithmic approach to network location problems. I: The p-centers. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 37(3):513-538, 1979. Google Scholar
  15. Marek Karpinski. Towards better inapproximability bounds for TSP: A challenge of global dependencies. In Adrian Kosowski and Igor Walukiewicz, editors, Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Fundamentals of Computation Theory (FCT 2015), volume 9210 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 3-11. Springer, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22177-9_1.
  16. Marek Karpinski and Richard Schmied. Improved inapproximability results for the shortest superstring and the bounded metric TSP. https://theory.cs.uni-bonn.de/ftp/reports/cs-reports/2013/85339-CS.pdf. Accessed: 2024-04-01.
  17. Marek Karpinski and Richard Schmied. On approximation lower bounds for TSP with bounded metrics. CoRR, abs/1201.5821, 2012. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.5821.
  18. Marek Karpinski and Richard Schmied. Improved inapproximability results for the shortest superstring and related problems. In Anthony Wirth, editor, Nineteenth Computing: The Australasian Theory Symposium, CATS 2013, Adelaide, Australia, February 2013, volume 141 of CRPIT, pages 27-36. Australian Computer Society, 2013. URL: http://crpit.scem.westernsydney.edu.au/abstracts/CRPITV141Karpinski.html.
  19. Marek Karpinski and Richard Schmied. Approximation hardness of graphic TSP on cubic graphs. RAIRO - Operations Research, 49(4):651-668, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2014062.
  20. Karthik C. S., Dániel Marx, Marcin Pilipczuk, and Uéverton S. Souza. Conditional lower bounds for sparse parameterized 2-CSP: A streamlined proof. CoRR, abs/2311.05913, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.05913.
  21. Jochen Könemann, Goran Konjevod, Ojas Parekh, and Amitabh Sinha. Improved approximations for tour and tree covers. Algorithmica, 38(3):441-449, 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-003-1071-0.
  22. Gilad Kutiel. Hardness results and approximation algorithms for the minimum dominating tree problem. CoRR, abs/1802.04498, 2018. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04498.
  23. Dániel Marx. Can you beat treewidth? In FOCS, pages 169-179. IEEE Computer Society, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2007.18.
  24. Nimrod Megiddo and Arie Tamir. New results on the complexity of p-center problems. SIAM J. Comput., 12(4):751-758, 1983. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/0212051.
  25. Sartaj Sahni and Teofilo F. Gonzalez. P-complete approximation problems. J. ACM, 23(3):555-565, 1976. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/321958.321975.
  26. A. Schrijver. Combinatorial Optimization - Polyhedra and Efficiency. Springer, 2003. Google Scholar
  27. András Sebő and Jens Vygen. Shorter tours by nicer ears: 7/5-approximation for the graph-TSP, 3/2 for the path version, and 4/3 for two-edge-connected subgraphs. Combinatorica, pages 1-34, 2014. Google Scholar
  28. Douglas R. Shier. A min-max theorem for p-center problems on a tree. Transportation Science, 11(3):243-252, 1977. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25767877.
  29. Arie Tamir. Obnoxious facility location on graphs. SIAM J. Discret. Math., 4(4):550-567, 1991. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/0404048.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail