Multiway Cuts with a Choice of Representatives

Authors Kristóf Bérczi , Tamás Király , Daniel P. Szabo



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.25.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.81 MB
  • 17 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Kristóf Bérczi
  • MTA-ELTE Matroid Optimization Research Group, Budapest, Hungary
  • HUN-REN-ELTE Egerváry Research Group on Combinatorial Optimization, Department of Operations Research, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Tamás Király
  • HUN-REN-ELTE Egerváry Research Group on Combinatorial Optimization, Department of Operations Research, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Daniel P. Szabo
  • Department of Operations Research, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary

Cite AsGet BibTex

Kristóf Bérczi, Tamás Király, and Daniel P. Szabo. Multiway Cuts with a Choice of Representatives. In 49th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 306, pp. 25:1-25:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.25

Abstract

In the Multiway Cut problem, we are given an undirected graph with nonnegative edge weights and a subset of k terminals, and the goal is to determine a set of edges of minimum total weight whose removal disconnects each terminal from the rest. The problem is APX-hard for k ≥ 3, and an extensive line of research has concentrated on closing the gap between the best upper and lower bounds for approximability and inapproximability, respectively. In this paper, we study several generalizations of Multiway Cut where the terminals can be chosen as representatives from sets of candidates T₁,…,T_q. In this setting, one is allowed to choose these representatives so that the minimum-weight cut separating these sets via their representatives is as small as possible. We distinguish different cases depending on (A) whether the representative of a candidate set has to be separated from the other candidate sets completely or only from the representatives, and (B) whether there is a single representative for each candidate set or the choice of representative is independent for each pair of candidate sets. For fixed q, we give approximation algorithms for each of these problems that match the best known approximation guarantee for Multiway Cut. Our technical contribution is a new extension of the CKR relaxation that preserves approximation guarantees. For general q, we show o(log q)-inapproximability for all cases where the choice of representatives may depend on the pair of candidate sets, as well as for the case where the goal is to separate a fixed node from a single representative from each candidate set. As a positive result, we give a 2-approximation algorithm for the case where we need to choose a single representative from each candidate set. This is a generalization of the (2-2/k)-approximation for k-Cut, and we can solve it by relating the tree case to optimization over a gammoid.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Rounding techniques
  • Theory of computation → Facility location and clustering
  • Theory of computation → Network optimization
  • Theory of computation → Linear programming
  • Theory of computation → Graph algorithms analysis
Keywords
  • Approximation algorithms
  • Multiway cut
  • CKR relaxation
  • Steiner multicut

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Niv Buchbinder, Joseph (Seffi) Naor, and Roy Schwartz. Simplex partitioning via exponential clocks and the multiway cut problem. In Proceedings of the Forty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC '13, pages 535-544, New York, NY, USA, 2013. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2488608.2488675.
  2. Kristóf Bérczi, Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran, Tamás Király, and Vivek Madan. Improving the integrality gap for multiway cut. Mathematical Programming, 183(1-2):171-193, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-020-01485-2.
  3. Shuchi Chawla, Robert Krauthgamer, Ravi Kumar, Yuval Rabani, and D Sivakumar. On the hardness of approximating multicut and sparsest-cut. computational complexity, 15:94-114, 2006. Google Scholar
  4. Gruia Călinescu, Howard Karloff, and Yuval Rabani. An improved approximation algorithm for multiway cut. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 60(3):564-574, 2000. URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1999.1687.
  5. E. Dahlhaus, D. S. Johnson, C. H. Papadimitriou, P. D. Seymour, and M. Yannakakis. The complexity of multiterminal cuts. SIAM Journal on Computing, 23(4):864-894, 1994. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539792225297.
  6. Irit Dinur and David Steurer. Analytical approach to parallel repetition. In Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC '14, pages 624-633, New York, NY, USA, 2014. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2591796.2591884.
  7. Naveen Garg, Vijay V Vazirani, and Mihalis Yannakakis. Approximate max-flow min-(multi) cut theorems and their applications. SIAM Journal on Computing, 25(2):235-251, 1996. Google Scholar
  8. Ralph E Gomory and Tien Chung Hu. Multi-terminal network flows. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 9(4):551-570, 1961. Google Scholar
  9. Anupam Gupta, Viswanath Nagarajan, and R. Ravi. An improved approximation algorithm for requirement cut. Operations Research Letters, 38(4):322-325, 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2010.02.009.
  10. David R. Karger, Philip Klein, Cliff Stein, Mikkel Thorup, and Neal E. Young. Rounding algorithms for a geometric embedding of minimum multiway cut. Mathematics of Operations Research, 29(3):436-461, 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1030.0086.
  11. Philip N Klein, Serge A Plotkin, Satish Rao, and Eva Tardos. Approximation algorithms for steiner and directed multicuts. Journal of Algorithms, 22(2):241-269, 1997. Google Scholar
  12. J. Kleinberg and E. Tardos. Approximation algorithms for classification problems with pairwise relationships: metric labeling and Markov random fields. In 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.99CB37039), pages 14-23, 1999. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/SFFCS.1999.814572.
  13. Pasin Manurangsi. Inapproximability of maximum biclique problems, minimum k-cut and densest at-least-k-subgraph from the small set expansion hypothesis. Algorithms, 11(1):10, 2018. Google Scholar
  14. Dana Moshkovitz. The projection games conjecture and the np-hardness of ln n-approximating set-cover. In APPROX-RANDOM, pages 276-287. Springer, 2012. Google Scholar
  15. Viswanath Nagarajan and R Ravi. Approximation algorithms for requirement cut on graphs. Algorithmica, 56:198-213, 2010. Google Scholar
  16. Huzur Saran and Vijay V. Vazirani. Finding k cuts within twice the optimal. SIAM Journal on Computing, 24(1):101-108, 1995. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539792251730.
  17. Roy Schwartz and Yotam Sharoni. Approximating Requirement Cut via a Configuration LP. In Jarosław Byrka and Raghu Meka, editors, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2020), volume 176 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 53:1-53:16, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2020. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2020.53.
  18. Ankit Sharma and Jan Vondrák. Multiway cut, pairwise realizable distributions, and descending thresholds. In Proceedings of the forty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 724-733, 2014. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail