Given a set of n non-overlapping geometric objects, can we separate a constant fraction of them using straight-line cuts that extend from edge to edge? In 1996, Urrutia posed this question for compact convex objects. Pach and Tardos later refuted it for general line segments by constructing a family where any separable subfamily has size at most O (n^{log₃ 2}). However, for axis-parallel rectangles, they provided positive evidence, showing that an Ω(1/log n)-fraction can be separated. This problem naturally arises in geometric approximation algorithms. In particular, when restricting cuts to only orthogonal straight lines, known as a guillotine cut sequence, any bound on the separability ratio directly translates into a clean and simple dynamic programming for computing a maximum independent set of geometric objects. This paper focuses on the case when the objects are squares. For squares of arbitrary sizes, an Ω(1)-fraction can be separated (Abed et al., APPROX 2015), recently improved to 1/40 (and 1/160 ≈ 0.62% for the weighted case) (Khan and Pittu, APPROX 2020). We further improve this bound, showing that a 9/256 ≈ 3.51% can be separated for the weighted case. This result significantly narrows the possible range for squares to [3.51%, 50%]. The key to our improvement is a refined analysis of the existing framework.
@InProceedings{chalermsook_et_al:LIPIcs.WADS.2025.16, author = {Chalermsook, Parinya and Kugelmann, Axel and Orgo, Ly and Uniyal, Sumedha and Zarsav, Minoo}, title = {{An Improved Guillotine Cut for Squares}}, booktitle = {19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)}, pages = {16:1--16:19}, series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)}, ISBN = {978-3-95977-398-0}, ISSN = {1868-8969}, year = {2025}, volume = {349}, editor = {Morin, Pat and Oh, Eunjin}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.16}, URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242472}, doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.16}, annote = {Keywords: Guillotine cuts, Geometric Approximation Algorithms, Rectangles, Squares} }
Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing