We study the following question, which has been considered since the 90’s: Does every st-planar graph admit a planar straight-line dominance drawing? We show concrete evidence for the difficulty of this question, by proving that, unlike upward planar straight-line drawings, planar straight-line dominance drawings with prescribed y-coordinates do not always exist and planar straight-line dominance drawings cannot always be constructed via a contract-draw-expand inductive approach. We also show several classes of st-planar graphs that always admit a planar straight-line dominance drawing. These include st-planar 3-trees in which every stacking operation introduces two edges incoming into the new vertex, st-planar graphs in which every vertex is adjacent to the sink, and st-planar graphs in which no face has the left boundary that is a single edge.
@InProceedings{angelini_et_al:LIPIcs.WADS.2025.5, author = {Angelini, Patrizio and Bekos, Michael A. and Di Battista, Giuseppe and Frati, Fabrizio and Grilli, Luca and Ortali, Giacomo}, title = {{On Planar Straight-Line Dominance Drawings}}, booktitle = {19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)}, pages = {5:1--5:18}, series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)}, ISBN = {978-3-95977-398-0}, ISSN = {1868-8969}, year = {2025}, volume = {349}, editor = {Morin, Pat and Oh, Eunjin}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.5}, URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242361}, doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.5}, annote = {Keywords: st-graphs, dominance drawings, planar straight-line drawings, upward planarity} }
Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing