Document Open Access Logo

Ontology Visualization Tools: A Bibliographic Review and a Proposal

Authors Ezra Gomes Marques, Cristiana Araújo , Pedro Rangel Henriques

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.SLATE.2024.3.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.12 MB
  • 14 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Ezra Gomes Marques
  • ALGORITMI Research Centre/LASI - DI, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
Cristiana Araújo
  • ALGORITMI Research Centre/LASI - DI, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
Pedro Rangel Henriques
  • ALGORITMI Research Centre/LASI - DI, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

Funding

This work has been supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the R&D Units Project Scope: UIDB/00319/2020. The Ph.D. work of Cristiana Araújo is supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Research Grant, with reference 2020.09845.BD, https://doi.org/10.54499/2020.09845.BD.

Cite As Get BibTex

Ezra Gomes Marques, Cristiana Araújo, and Pedro Rangel Henriques. Ontology Visualization Tools: A Bibliographic Review and a Proposal. In 13th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2024). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 120, pp. 3:1-3:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024) https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2024.3

Abstract

Information can be graphically presented to users through different visualization methods, which can be complemented by various features meant to facilitate the navigation and interpretation of the presented information. Many of these methods and features are already in use by current ontology visualization tools, while others, along with some concepts from the broader field of information visualization, are merely explored in the literature despite their potential to also be applied in this specific field. This paper aims to analyze key characteristics of the current state of the art of ontology visualization tools, as well as the notable benefits and limitations of each of them, by extensively reviewing this body of work. Additionally, it also aims to demonstrate how the resulting insight has aided the development of PrOnto, a new platform dedicated to the visualization of OntoDL+ ontologies.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Ontologies
  • Human-centered computing → Information visualization
Keywords
  • Ontology
  • Information Visualization
  • Ontology Visualization
  • Ontology Navigation
  • OntoDL+

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

References

  1. Cristiana Araújo, Pedro Rangel Henriques, and João José Cerqueira. Training computational thinking to leverage citizens of next generation. In Alvaro Rocha, Hojjat Adeli, Gintautas Dzemyda, Fernando Moreira, and Valentina Colla, editors, Information Systems and Technologies, pages 481-490, Cham, 2024. Springer Nature Switzerland. Google Scholar
  2. Cristiana Esteves Araújo. Training Computational Thinking: exploring approaches supported by Neuroscience. PhD thesis, University of Minho, March 2022. PDInf - prethesis. Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin Bach, Emmanuel Pietriga, Ilaria Liccardi, and Gennady Legostaev. OntoTrix: A Hybrid Visualization for Populated Ontologies. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, WWW '11, pages 177-180, New York, NY, USA, 2011. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1963192.1963283.
  4. Fabian Beck, Michael Burch, Stephan Diehl, and Daniel Weiskopf. The State of the Art in Visualizing Dynamic Graphs. EuroVis (STARs), 2014. Google Scholar
  5. Jacques Bertin. Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin Press, 1983. Google Scholar
  6. Alessio Bosca, Dario Bonino, and Paolo Pellegrino. OntoSphere: more than a 3D ontology visualization tool. In Swap. Citeseer, 2005. Google Scholar
  7. Michael Burch and Steffen Lohmann. Visualizing the evolution of ontologies: A dynamic graph perspective. In VOILA@ ISWC, pages 69-76, 2015. Google Scholar
  8. Stuart Card. Information Visualization, pages 509-543. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, January 2008. Google Scholar
  9. Se-Hang Cheong and Yain-Whar Si. Force-directed algorithms for schematic drawings and placement: A survey. Information Visualization, 19(1):65-91, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871618821740.
  10. Se-Hang Cheong, Yain-Whar Si, and Raymond K. Wong. Online force-directed algorithms for visualization of dynamic graphs. Information Sciences, 556:223-255, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.12.069.
  11. Alexandre Miguel Costa Dias. ONTODL+, An ontology description language and its compiler. Master’s thesis, Minho University, Braga, Portugal, September 2021. MSc dissertation. Google Scholar
  12. Damion M Dooley and William WL Hsiao. 3D Visualization of Application Ontology Class Hierarchies. In JOWO, 2019. Google Scholar
  13. Marek Dudáš, Steffen Lohmann, Vojtěch Svátek, and Dmitry Pavlov. Ontology visualization methods and tools: a survey of the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 33:e10, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888918000073.
  14. Jean-Daniel Fekete, Jarke J Van Wijk, John T Stasko, and Chris North. The Value of Information Visualization. Information Visualization: Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives, pages 1-18, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70956-5_1.
  15. Manuel Freire and Pilar Rodríguez. Preserving the mental map in interactive graph interfaces. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pages 270-273, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133319.
  16. Bo Fu, Natalya F Noy, and Margaret-Anne Storey. Indented tree or graph? A usability study of ontology visualization techniques in the context of class mapping evaluation. In The Semantic Web-ISWC 2013: 12th International Semantic Web Conference, Sydney, NSW, Australia, October 21-25, 2013, Proceedings, Part I 12, pages 117-134. Springer, 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41335-3_8.
  17. Bo Fu, Natalya F Noy, and Margaret-Anne Storey. Eye tracking the user experience-An evaluation of ontology visualization techniques. Semantic Web, 8(1):23-41, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-140163.
  18. M. Ghoniem, J.-D. Fekete, and P. Castagliola. A Comparison of the Readability of Graphs Using Node-Link and Matrix-Based Representations. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pages 17-24, 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2004.1.
  19. Thomas R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220, 1993. URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008.
  20. Simon Suigen Guo and Christine W Chan. A tool for ontology visualizaiton in 3D graphics: Onto3DViz. In CCECE 2010, pages 1-4. IEEE, 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2010.5575219.
  21. Michael Hartung, Anika Gross, and Erhard Rahm. CODEX: exploration of semantic changes between ontology versions. Bioinformatics, 28(6):895-896, 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTS029.
  22. Ivan Herman, Guy Melançon, and M Scott Marshall. Graph Visualization and Navigation in Information Visualization: a Survey. IEEE Transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 6(1):24-43, 2000. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/2945.841119.
  23. Danny Holten. Hierarchical Edge Bundles: Visualization of Adjacency Relations in Hierarchical Data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5):741-748, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.147.
  24. Akrivi Katifori, Constantin Halatsis, George Lepouras, Costas Vassilakis, and Eugenia Giannopoulou. Ontology visualization methods—a survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 39(4):10-es, 2007. Google Scholar
  25. Akrivi Katifori, Elena Torou, Constantin Halatsis, Georgios Lepouras, and Costas Vassilakis. A Comparative Study of Four Ontology Visualization Techniques in Protege: Experiment Setup and Preliminary Results. In Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06), pages 417-423, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2006.3.
  26. Patrick Lambrix, Zlatan Dragisic, Valentina Ivanova, and Craig Anslow. Visualization for Ontology Evolution. In 2nd International Workshop on Visualization and Interaction for Ontologies and Linked Data, Kobe, Japan, October 17, 2016, pages 54-67. Rheinisch-Westfaelische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, 2016. URL: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1704/paper5.pdf.
  27. André Filipe Amorim Lara. Visualization of Ontology Evolution using OntoDiffGraph. Master’s thesis, Minho University, Braga, Portugal, September 2017. Google Scholar
  28. Riccardo Mazza. Introduction to Information Visualization, chapter 1,2. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009. Google Scholar
  29. Enrico Motta, Paul Mulholland, Silvio Peroni, Mathieu d'Aquin, Jose Manuel Gomez-Perez, Victor Mendez, and Fouad Zablith. A Novel Approach to Visualizing and Navigating Ontologies. In Lora Aroyo, Chris Welty, Harith Alani, Jamie Taylor, Abraham Bernstein, Lalana Kagal, Natasha Noy, and Eva Blomqvist, editors, The Semantic Web - ISWC 2011, pages 470-486, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google Scholar
  30. T. Munzner. Exploring large graphs in 3D hyperbolic space. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 18(4):18-23, 1998. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/38.689657.
  31. Natalya F Noy, Deborah L McGuinness, et al. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, 2001. Google Scholar
  32. David Stephen John Perrin. PROMPT-Viz: Ontology Version Comparison Visualizations with Treemaps. Master’s thesis, University of Victoria, 2004. Google Scholar
  33. Jun Rekimoto and Mark Green. The Information Cube: Using Transparency in 3D Information Visualization. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on Information Technologies & Systems (WITS’93), volume 13, pages 125-132, 1993. Google Scholar
  34. Isabel Cristina Siqueira Silva, Carla Maria Dal Sasso Freitas, and Giuseppe Santucci. An Integrated Approach for Evaluating the Visualization of Intensional and Extensional Levels of Ontologies. In Proceedings of the 2012 BELIV Workshop: Beyond Time and Errors - Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization, BELIV '12, New York, NY, USA, 2012. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2442576.2442578.
  35. Isabel Cristina Siqueira Silva, Giuseppe Santucci, and Carla Maria Dal Sasso Freitas. Visualization and analysis of schema and instances of ontologies for improving user tasks and knowledge discovery. Journal of Computer Languages, 51:28-47, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cola.2019.01.004.
  36. H.S. Smallman, M. St. John, H.M. Oonk, and M.B. Cowen. Information availability in 2D and 3D displays. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(5):51-57, 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/38.946631.
  37. Ramanathan Somasundaram. OntoSELF: A 3D ontology visualization tool. PhD thesis, Miami University, 2007. Google Scholar
  38. Tatiana Von Landesberger, Arjan Kuijper, Tobias Schreck, Jörn Kohlhammer, Jarke J van Wijk, J-D Fekete, and Dieter W Fellner. Visual analysis of large graphs: state-of-the-art and future research challenges. In Computer graphics forum, volume 30, pages 1719-1749. Wiley Online Library, 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8659.2011.01898.X.
  39. Yunhai Wang, Yanyan Wang, Haifeng Zhang, Yinqi Sun, Chi-Wing Fu, Michael Sedlmair, Baoquan Chen, and Oliver Deussen. Structure-aware Fisheye Views for Efficient Large Graph Exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(1):566-575, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864911.
  40. Colin Ware. Information Visualization: Perception for Design, chapter 1,7. Morgan Kaufmann, 2013. Google Scholar
  41. Ying Yang, Michael Wybrow, Yuan-Fang Li, Tobias Czauderna, and Yongqun He. OntoPlot: A Novel Visualisation for Non-hierarchical Associations in Large Ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(1):1140-1150, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934557.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact