3 Search Results for "Janzing, Dominik"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2025.6
Quantum SAT Problems with Finite Sets of Projectors Are Complete for a Plethora of Classes

Authors: Ricardo Rivera Cardoso, Alex Meiburg, and Daniel Nagaj

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 350, 20th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2025)

Abstract
Previously, all known variants of the Quantum Satisfiability (QSAT) problem - consisting of determining whether a k-local (k-body) Hamiltonian is frustration-free - could be classified as being either in 𝖯; or complete for NP, MA, or QMA₁. Here, we present new qubit variants of this problem that are complete for BQP₁, coRP, QCMA, PI(coRP,NP), PI(BQP₁,NP), PI(BQP₁,MA), SoPU(coRP,NP), SoPU(BQP₁,NP), and SoPU(BQP₁,MA). Our result implies that a complete classification of quantum constraint satisfaction problems (QCSPs), analogous to Schaefer’s dichotomy theorem for classical CSPs, must either include these 13 classes, or otherwise show that some are equal. Additionally, our result showcases two new types of QSAT problems that can be decided efficiently, as well as the first nontrivial BQP₁-complete problem. We first construct QSAT problems on qudits that are complete for BQP₁, coRP, and QCMA. These are made by restricting the finite set of Hamiltonians to consist of elements similar to H_{init}, H_{prop}, and H_{out}, seen in the circuit-to-Hamiltonian transformation. Usually, these are used to demonstrate hardness of QSAT and Local Hamiltonian problems, and so our proofs of hardness are simple. The difficulty lies in ensuring that all Hamiltonians generated with these three elements can be decided in their respective classes. For this, we build our Hamiltonian terms with high-dimensional data and clock qudits, ternary logic, and either monogamy of entanglement or specific clock encodings. We then show how to express these problems in terms of qubits, by proving that any QCSP can be reduced to a qubit problem while maintaining the same complexity - something not believed possible classically. The remaining six problems are obtained by considering "sums" and "products" of some of the QSAT problems mentioned here. Before this work, the QSAT problems generated in this way resulted in complete problems for PI and SoPU classes that were trivially equal to NP, MA, or QMA₁. We thus commence the study of these new and seemingly nontrivial classes. While [Meiburg, 2021] first sought to prove completeness for coRP, BQP₁, and QCMA, we note that those constructions are flawed. Here, we rework them, provide correct proofs, and obtain improvements on the required qudit dimensionality.
Cite as

Ricardo Rivera Cardoso, Alex Meiburg, and Daniel Nagaj. Quantum SAT Problems with Finite Sets of Projectors Are Complete for a Plethora of Classes. In 20th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 350, pp. 6:1-6:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{riveracardoso_et_al:LIPIcs.TQC.2025.6,
  author =	{Rivera Cardoso, Ricardo and Meiburg, Alex and Nagaj, Daniel},
  title =	{{Quantum SAT Problems with Finite Sets of Projectors Are Complete for a Plethora of Classes}},
  booktitle =	{20th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2025)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-392-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{350},
  editor =	{Fefferman, Bill},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2025.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-240557},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2025.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum complexity theory, quantum satisfiability, circuit-to-Hamiltonian, pairwise union of classes, pairwise intersection of classes}
}
Document
Track B: Automata, Logic, Semantics, and Theory of Programming
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.144
Probabilistic and Causal Satisfiability: Constraining the Model

Authors: Markus Bläser, Julian Dörfler, Maciej Liśkiewicz, and Benito van der Zander

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We study the complexity of satisfiability problems in probabilistic and causal reasoning. Given random variables X₁, X₂,… over finite domains, the basic terms are probabilities of propositional formulas over atomic events X_i = x_i, such as ℙ(X₁ = x₁) or ℙ(X₁ = x₁ ∨ X₂ = x₂). The basic terms can be combined using addition (yielding linear terms) or multiplication (polynomial terms). The probabilistic satisfiability problem asks whether a joint probability distribution satisfies a Boolean combination of (in)equalities over such terms. Fagin et al. [Fagin et al., 1990] showed that for basic and linear terms, this problem is NP-complete, making it no harder than Boolean satisfiability, while Mossé et al. [Mossé et al., 2022] proved that for polynomial terms, it is complete for the existential theory of the reals. Pearl’s Causal Hierarchy (PCH) extends the probabilistic setting with interventional and counterfactual reasoning, enriching the expressiveness of the languages. However, Mossé et al. [Mossé et al., 2022] found that the complexity of satisfiability remains unchanged. Van der Zander et al. [van der Zander et al., 2023] showed that introducing a marginalization operator to languages induces a significant increase in complexity. We extend this line of work by adding two new dimensions to the problem by constraining the models. First, we fix the graph structure of the underlying structural causal model, motivated by settings like Pearl’s do-calculus, and give a nearly complete landscape across different arithmetics and PCH levels. Second, we study small models. While earlier work showed that satisfiable instances admit polynomial-size models, this is no longer guaranteed with compact marginalization. We characterize the complexities of satisfiability under small-model constraints across different settings.
Cite as

Markus Bläser, Julian Dörfler, Maciej Liśkiewicz, and Benito van der Zander. Probabilistic and Causal Satisfiability: Constraining the Model. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 144:1-144:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{blaser_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.144,
  author =	{Bl\"{a}ser, Markus and D\"{o}rfler, Julian and Li\'{s}kiewicz, Maciej and van der Zander, Benito},
  title =	{{Probabilistic and Causal Satisfiability: Constraining the Model}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{144:1--144:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.144},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235214},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.144},
  annote =	{Keywords: Existential theory of the real numbers, Computational complexity, Probabilistic logic, Structural Causal Models}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.09401.1
09401 Abstracts Collection – Machine learning approaches to statistical dependences and causality

Authors: Dominik Janzing, Steffen Lauritzen, and Bernhard Schölkopf

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9401, Machine learning approaches to statistical dependences and causality (2010)

Abstract
From 27.09.2009 to 02.10.2009, the Dagstuhl Seminar 09401 ``Machine learning approaches to statistical dependences and causality'' was held in Schloss Dagstuhl~--~Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available.
Cite as

Dominik Janzing, Steffen Lauritzen, and Bernhard Schölkopf. 09401 Abstracts Collection – Machine learning approaches to statistical dependences and causality. In Machine learning approaches to statistical dependences and causality. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9401, pp. 1-15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{janzing_et_al:DagSemProc.09401.1,
  author =	{Janzing, Dominik and Lauritzen, Steffen and Sch\"{o}lkopf, Bernhard},
  title =	{{09401 Abstracts Collection – Machine learning approaches to statistical dependences and causality }},
  booktitle =	{Machine learning approaches to statistical dependences and causality},
  pages =	{1--15},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2010},
  volume =	{9401},
  editor =	{Dominik Janzing and Steffen Lauritzen and Bernhard Sch\"{o}lkopf},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.09401.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-23636},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.09401.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Machine learning, statistical dependences, causality}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 3 Document/PDF
  • 2 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2025
  • 1 2010

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Bläser, Markus
  • 1 Dörfler, Julian
  • 1 Janzing, Dominik
  • 1 Lauritzen, Steffen
  • 1 Liśkiewicz, Maciej
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 2 LIPIcs
  • 1 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Theory of computation → Complexity theory and logic
  • 1 Theory of computation → Quantum complexity theory

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Computational complexity
  • 1 Existential theory of the real numbers
  • 1 Machine learning
  • 1 Probabilistic logic
  • 1 Quantum complexity theory
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact