3 Search Results for "Kondapally, Ranganath"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.33
A Min-Entropy Approach to Multi-Party Communication Lower Bounds

Authors: Mi-Ying (Miryam) Huang, Xinyu Mao, Shuo Wang, Guangxu Yang, and Jiapeng Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
Information complexity is one of the most powerful techniques to prove information-theoretical lower bounds, in which Shannon entropy plays a central role. Though Shannon entropy has some convenient properties, such as the chain rule, it still has inherent limitations. One of the most notable barriers is the square-root loss, which appears in the square-root gap between entropy gaps and statistical distances, e.g., Pinsker’s inequality. To bypass this barrier, we introduce a new method based on min-entropy analysis. Building on this new method, we prove the following results. - An Ω(N^{∑_i α_i - max_i {α_i}}/k) randomized communication lower bound of the k-party set-intersection problem where the i-th party holds a random set of size ≈ N^{1-α_i}. - A tight Ω(n/k) randomized lower bound of the k-party Tree Pointer Jumping problems, improving an Ω(n/k²) lower bound by Chakrabarti, Cormode, and McGregor (STOC 08). - An Ω(n/k+√n) lower bound of the Chained Index problem, improving an Ω(n/k²) lower bound by Cormode, Dark, and Konrad (ICALP 19). Since these problems served as hard problems for numerous applications in streaming lower bounds and cryptography, our new lower bounds directly improve these streaming lower bounds and cryptography lower bounds. On the technical side, min-entropy does not have nice properties such as the chain rule. To address this issue, we enhance the structure-vs-pseudorandomness decomposition used by Göös, Pitassi, and Watson (FOCS 17) and Yang and Zhang (STOC 24); both papers used this decomposition to prove communication lower bounds. In this paper, we give a new breath to this method in the multi-party setting, presenting a new toolkit for proving multi-party communication lower bounds.
Cite as

Mi-Ying (Miryam) Huang, Xinyu Mao, Shuo Wang, Guangxu Yang, and Jiapeng Zhang. A Min-Entropy Approach to Multi-Party Communication Lower Bounds. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 33:1-33:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{huang_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.33,
  author =	{Huang, Mi-Ying (Miryam) and Mao, Xinyu and Wang, Shuo and Yang, Guangxu and Zhang, Jiapeng},
  title =	{{A Min-Entropy Approach to Multi-Party Communication Lower Bounds}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237273},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: communication complexity, lifting theorems, set intersection, chained index}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.89
Optimal Communication Complexity of Chained Index

Authors: Janani Sundaresan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We study the chain communication problem introduced by Cormode et al. [ICALP 2019]. For k ≥ 1, in the chain_{n,k} problem, there are k string and index pairs (X_i, σ_i) for i ∈ [k] such that the value at position σ_i in string X_i is the same bit for all k pairs. The input is shared between k+1 players as follows. Player 1 has the first string X₁ ∈ {0,1}ⁿ, player 2 has the first index σ₁ ∈ [n] and the second string X₂ ∈ {0,1}ⁿ, player 3 has the second index σ₂ ∈ [n] along with the third string X₃ ∈ {0,1}ⁿ, and so on. Player k+1 has the last index σ_k ∈ [n]. The communication is one way from each player to the next, starting from player 1 to player 2, then from player 2 to player 3 and so on. Player k+1, after receiving the message from player k, has to output a single bit which is the value at position σ_i in X_i for any i ∈ [k]. It is a generalization of the well-studied index problem, which is equivalent to chain_{n, 2}. Cormode et al. proved that the chain_{n,k} problem requires Ω(n/k²) communication, and they used it to prove streaming lower bounds for the approximation of maximum independent sets. Subsequently, Feldman et al. [STOC 2020] used it to prove lower bounds for streaming submodular maximization. However, it is not known whether the Ω(n/k²) lower bound used in these works is optimal for the problem, and in fact, it was conjectured by Cormode et al. that Ω(n) bits are necessary. We prove the optimal lower bound of Ω(n) for chain_{n,k} when k = o(n/log n) as our main result. This settles the open conjecture of Cormode et al., barring the range of k = Ω(n /log n). The main technique is a reduction to a non-standard index problem where the input to the players is such that the answer is biased away from uniform. This biased version of index is analyzed using tools from information theory. As a corollary, we get an improved lower bound for approximation of maximum independent set in vertex arrival streams via a reduction from chain directly.
Cite as

Janani Sundaresan. Optimal Communication Complexity of Chained Index. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 89:1-89:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sundaresan:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.89,
  author =	{Sundaresan, Janani},
  title =	{{Optimal Communication Complexity of Chained Index}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{89:1--89:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.89},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227172},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.89},
  annote =	{Keywords: communication complexity, index communciation problem}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2014.545
Certifying Equality With Limited Interaction

Authors: Joshua Brody, Amit Chakrabarti, Ranganath Kondapally, David P. Woodruff, and Grigory Yaroslavtsev

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 28, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2014)

Abstract
The EQUALITY problem is usually one’s first encounter with communication complexity and is one of the most fundamental problems in the field. Although its deterministic and randomized communication complexity were settled decades ago, we find several new things to say about the problem by focusing on three subtle aspects. The first is to consider the expected communication cost (at a worst-case input) for a protocol that uses limited interaction—i.e., a bounded number of rounds of communication—and whose error probability is zero or close to it. The second is to treat the false negative error rate separately from the false positive error rate. The third is to consider the information cost of such protocols. We obtain asymptotically optimal rounds-versus-cost tradeoffs for EQUALITY: both expected communication cost and information cost scale as Theta(log log ... log n), with r-1 logs, where r is the number of rounds. These bounds hold even when the false negative rate approaches 1. For the case of zero-error communication cost, we obtain essentially matching bounds, up to a tiny additive constant. We also provide some applications.
Cite as

Joshua Brody, Amit Chakrabarti, Ranganath Kondapally, David P. Woodruff, and Grigory Yaroslavtsev. Certifying Equality With Limited Interaction. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2014). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 28, pp. 545-581, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2014)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brody_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2014.545,
  author =	{Brody, Joshua and Chakrabarti, Amit and Kondapally, Ranganath and Woodruff, David P. and Yaroslavtsev, Grigory},
  title =	{{Certifying Equality With Limited Interaction}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2014)},
  pages =	{545--581},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-74-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2014},
  volume =	{28},
  editor =	{Jansen, Klaus and Rolim, Jos\'{e} and Devanur, Nikhil R. and Moore, Cristopher},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2014.545},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-47229},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2014.545},
  annote =	{Keywords: equality, communication complexity, information complexity}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 3 Document/PDF
  • 2 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2025
  • 1 2014

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Brody, Joshua
  • 1 Chakrabarti, Amit
  • 1 Huang, Mi-Ying (Miryam)
  • 1 Kondapally, Ranganath
  • 1 Mao, Xinyu
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 3 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Communication complexity

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 communication complexity
  • 1 chained index
  • 1 equality
  • 1 index communciation problem
  • 1 information complexity
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact