Conjunctive Grammars, Cellular Automata and Logic

Authors Théo Grente, Étienne Grandjean



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.AUTOMATA.2021.8.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.79 MB
  • 19 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Théo Grente
  • GREYC, Université de Caen Normandie, France
Étienne Grandjean
  • GREYC, Université de Caen Normandie, France

Acknowledgements

This paper would not exist without the inspiration of Véronique Terrier. Her in-depth knowledge of cellular automata, their complexity classes and their closure properties in relation to formal language theory, the references and advice she generously gave us, as well as her careful reading, were essential in designing and finalizing the results and the presentation of the paper. E.g., the class diagram of Figure 8 is due to her. We also thank the three reviewers of this paper for their careful reading and their detailed constructive comments and suggestions which helped us improve some parts of this paper.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Théo Grente and Étienne Grandjean. Conjunctive Grammars, Cellular Automata and Logic. In 27th IFIP WG 1.5 International Workshop on Cellular Automata and Discrete Complex Systems (AUTOMATA 2021). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 90, pp. 8:1-8:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.AUTOMATA.2021.8

Abstract

The expressive power of the class Conj of conjunctive languages, i.e. languages generated by the conjunctive grammars of Okhotin, is largely unknown, while its restriction LinConj to linear conjunctive grammars equals the class of languages recognized by real-time one-dimensional one-way cellular automata. We prove two weakened versions of the open question Conj ⊆? RealTime1CA, where RealTime1CA is the class of languages recognized by real-time one-dimensional two-way cellular automata: 1) it is true for unary languages; 2) Conj ⊆ RealTime2OCA, i.e. any conjunctive language is recognized by a real-time two-dimensional one-way cellular automaton. Interestingly, we express the rules of a conjunctive grammar in two Horn logics, which exactly characterize the complexity classes RealTime1CA and RealTime2OCA.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Complexity theory and logic
  • Theory of computation → Formal languages and automata theory
Keywords
  • Computational complexity
  • Real-time
  • One-dimensional/two-dimensional cellular automaton
  • One-way/two-way communication
  • Grid-circuit
  • Unary language
  • Descriptive complexity
  • Existential second-order logic
  • Horn formula

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Serge Abiteboul, Richard Hull, and Victor Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995. Google Scholar
  2. Nicolas Bacquey, Etienne Grandjean, and Frédéric Olive. Definability by Horn Formulas and Linear Time on Cellular Automata. In ICALP 2017, volume 80, pages 99:1-99:14, 2017. Google Scholar
  3. Egon Börger, Erich Grädel, and Yuri Gurevich. The Classical Decision Problem. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer, 1997. Google Scholar
  4. Jik H. Chang, Oscar H. Ibarra, and Michael A. Palis. Efficient simulations of simple models of parallel computation by time-bounded atms and space-bounded tms. Theor. Comput. Sci., 68(1):19-36, 1989. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(89)90116-3.
  5. Christian Choffrut and Karel Culik II. On real-time cellular automata and trellis automata. Acta Informatica, 21(4):393-407, 1984. Google Scholar
  6. Marianne Delorme and Jacques Mazoyer. Cellular Automata as Language Recognizers in Cellular Automata: a Parallel Model. Kluwer, 1999. Google Scholar
  7. Ronald Fagin. Generalized first-order spectra and polynomial-time recognizable sets. In Complexity of Computation, SIAM-AMS Proceedings, pages 43-73, 1974. Google Scholar
  8. Dora Giammarresi, Antonio Restivo, Sebastian Seibert, and Wolfgang Thomas. Monadic second-order logic over rectangular pictures and recognizability by tiling systems. Inf. Comput., 125(1):32-45, 1996. URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/inco.1996.0018.
  9. Leslie M. Goldschlager. A universal interconnection pattern for parallel computers. J. ACM, 29(4):1073–1086, 1982. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/322344.322353.
  10. Erich Grädel. Capturing complexity classes by fragments of second-order logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 101(1):35-57, 1992. Google Scholar
  11. Erich Grädel, Phokion G. Kolaitis, Leonid Libkin, Maarten Marx, Joel Spencer, Moshe Y. Vardi, Yde Venema, and Scott Weinstein. Finite Model Theory and Its Applications. Springer, 2007. Google Scholar
  12. Etienne Grandjean and Théo Grente. Descriptive complexity for minimal time of cellular automata. In LICS, 2019, pages 1-13, 2019. Google Scholar
  13. Etienne Grandjean, Théo Grente, and Véronique Terrier. Inductive definitions in logic versus programs of real-time cellular automata. hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02474520/ submitted to Theoretical Computer Science, 62 pages, February 2020. Google Scholar
  14. Etienne Grandjean and Frédéric Olive. A logical approach to locality in pictures languages. Journal of Computer and System Science, 82(6):959-1006, 2016. Google Scholar
  15. Oscar H. Ibarra and Tao Jiang. Relating the power of cellular arrays to their closure properties. Theor. Comput. Sci., 57:225-238, 1988. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(88)90040-0.
  16. Neil Immerman. Descriptive complexity. Springer, 1999. Google Scholar
  17. Artur Jez. Conjunctive grammars generate non-regular unary languages. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 19(3):597-615, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1142/S012905410800584X.
  18. K. N. King. Alternating multihead finite automata. Theor. Comput. Sci., 61:149-174, 1988. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(88)90122-3.
  19. Hans Kleine Büning and Theodor Lettmann. Propositional logic - deduction and algorithms, volume 48 of Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science. Cambridge University Press, 1999. Google Scholar
  20. S. Rao Kosaraju. Speed of recognition of context-free languages by array automata. SIAM J. Comput., 4(3):331-340, 1975. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/0204028.
  21. Leonid Libkin. Elements of Finite Model Theory. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series. Springer, 2004. Google Scholar
  22. Alexander Okhotin. Conjunctive grammars. J. Autom. Lang. Comb., 6(4):519-535, 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.25596/jalc-2001-519.
  23. Alexander Okhotin. Conjunctive grammars and systems of language equations. Program. Comput. Softw., 28(5):243-249, 2002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020213411126.
  24. Alexander Okhotin. Boolean grammars. Information and Computation, 194(1):19-48, 2004. Google Scholar
  25. Alexander Okhotin. On the equivalence of linear conjunctive grammars and trellis automata. Theoretical Informatics and Applications, 38(1):69-88, 2004. Google Scholar
  26. Alexander Okhotin. Conjunctive and boolean grammars: The true general case of the context-free grammars. Computer Science Review, 9:27-59, 2013. Google Scholar
  27. Véronique Terrier. Language not recognizable in real time by one-way cellular automata. Theoretical Computer Science, 156(1-2):281-287, March 1996. Google Scholar
  28. Véronique Terrier. Closure properties of cellular automata. Theor. Comput. Sci., 352(1-3):97-107, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2005.10.039.
  29. Véronique Terrier. Low complexity classes of multidimensional cellular automata. Theor. Comput. Sci., 369(1-3):142-156, 2006. Google Scholar
  30. Véronique Terrier. Language recognition by cellular automata. In Handbook of Natural Computing, pages 123-158. Springer, 2012. Google Scholar
  31. Hao Wang. Dominoes and the aea case of the decision problem. In Proceedings on the Symposium on the Mathematical Theory of Automata, April 1962, pages 23-55, 1963. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail