Declarative Debugging of Missing Answers for Maude

Authors Adrian Riesco, Alberto Verdejo, Narciso Marti-Oliet



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.RTA.2010.277.pdf
  • Filesize: 206 kB
  • 18 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Adrian Riesco
Alberto Verdejo
Narciso Marti-Oliet

Cite As Get BibTex

Adrian Riesco, Alberto Verdejo, and Narciso Marti-Oliet. Declarative Debugging of Missing Answers for Maude. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 6, pp. 277-294, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2010.277

Abstract

Declarative debugging is a semi-automatic technique that starts 
from an incorrect computation and locates a program fragment responsible for the error by building a tree representing this computation and guiding the user through it to find the error. Membership equational logic (MEL) is an equational 
logic that in addition to equations allows the statement of membership axioms characterizing the elements of a sort. Rewriting logic is a logic of change that extends MEL by adding rewrite rules, that correspond to transitions between states and can be nondeterministic. In this paper we propose a calculus that allows to 
infer normal forms and least sorts with the equational part, and sets of reachable terms through rules. We use an abbreviation of the proof trees computed with this calculus to build appropriate debugging trees for missing answers (results that  are erroneous because they are incomplete), whose adequacy for debugging is proved.
Using these trees we have implemented a declarative debugger for Maude, a high-performance system based on rewriting logic, whose use is illustrated with an example.

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • Declarative debugging
  • Maude
  • Missing answers
  • Rewriting

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail