DagRep.5.4.142.pdf
- Filesize: 0.75 MB
- 18 pages
Document
Qualification of Formal Methods Tools (Dagstuhl Seminar 15182)
Authors and all authors of the abstracts in this report
-
Part of:
Issue:
Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 5, Issue 4
Volume: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 5
Journal: Dagstuhl Reports (DagRep) - License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license
- Publication Date: 2015-12-16
Cite As Get BibTex
Darren Cofer, Gerwin Klein, Konrad Slind, and Virginie Wiels. Qualification of Formal Methods Tools (Dagstuhl Seminar 15182). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp. 142-159, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.5.4.142
Abstract
Formal methods tools have been shown to be effective at finding defects in and verifying the correctness of safety-critical systems, many of which require some form of certification. However, there are still many issues that must be addressed before formal verification tools can be used as part of the certification of safety-critical systems. For example, most developers of avionics systems are unfamiliar with which formal methods tools are most appropriate for different problem domains. Different levels of expertise are necessary to use these tools effectively and correctly. In most certification processes, a tool used to meet process objectives must be qualified. The qualification of formal verification tools will likely pose unique challenges.
Subject Classification
Keywords
- Dependable systems
- Certification
- Qualification
- Formal methods
- Verification tools
Metrics
- Access Statistics
-
Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
0PDF Downloads