Timing of Pedestrian Navigation Instructions

Authors Ioannis Giannopoulos, David Jonietz, Martin Raubal, Georgios Sarlas, Lisa Stähli



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.COSIT.2017.16.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.6 MB
  • 13 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Ioannis Giannopoulos
David Jonietz
Martin Raubal
Georgios Sarlas
Lisa Stähli

Cite As Get BibTex

Ioannis Giannopoulos, David Jonietz, Martin Raubal, Georgios Sarlas, and Lisa Stähli. Timing of Pedestrian Navigation Instructions. In 13th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 86, pp. 16:1-16:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2017.16

Abstract

During pedestrian navigation in outdoor urban environments we often utilize assistance systems to support decision-making. These systems help wayfinders by providing relevant information withing the context of their surroundings, e.g., landmark-based instructions of the type "turn left at the church". Next to the instruction type and content, also the timing of the instruction must be considered in order to facilitate the wayfinding process. In this work we present our findings concerning the user and environmental factors that have an impact on the timing of instructions. We applied a survival analysis on data collected through an experiment in a realistic virtual environment in order to analyze the expected distance to the decision point until instructions are needed. The presented results can be used by navigation systems for instruction timing based on the characteristics of the current wayfinder and environment.

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • navigation
  • wayfinding
  • instructions
  • timing
  • survival analysis

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Gary L. Allen. From knowledge to words to wayfinding: Issues in the production and comprehension of route directions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT'97, pages 363-372, London, UK, 1997. Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
  2. Panagiotis Ch. Anastasopoulos, Mouyid B. Islam, Dionysia Perperidou, and Matthew G. Karlaftis. Hazard-based analysis of travel distance in urban environments: longitudinal data approach. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 138(1):53-61, 2012. Google Scholar
  3. Chandra R. Bhat and Abdul R. Pinjari. Duration modeling. In Handbook of Transport Modelling: 2nd Edition, pages 105-131. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2007. Google Scholar
  4. Thomas A. Dingus, Melissa C. Hulse, Steven K. Jahns, J. Alves-Foss, S. Confer, A. Rice, I. Roberts, Richard J. Hanowski, D. Sorenson, et al. Development of human factors guidelines for advanced traveler information systems and commercial vehicle operations: Literature review. United States. Federal Highway Administration, 1996. Google Scholar
  5. Kellie George, Paul Green, and Jill Fleming. Timing of auditory route-guidance instructions. Technical report, The University of Michigan, 1996. Google Scholar
  6. Ioannis Giannopoulos, Peter Kiefer, and Martin Raubal. GeoGazemarks: Providing gaze history for the orientation on small display maps. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction, ICMI'12, pages 165-172. ACM, 2012. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2388676.2388711.
  7. Ioannis Giannopoulos, Peter Kiefer, Martin Raubal, Kai-Florian Richter, and Tyler Thrash. Wayfinding decision situations: A conceptual model and evaluation. In International Conference on Geographic Information Science, GIScience'14, pages 221-234. Springer, 2014. Google Scholar
  8. Reginald G. Golledge. Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In Reginald G. Golledge, editor, Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes, chapter 1, pages 5-45. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MA, 1999. Google Scholar
  9. Alice F. Healy, Vivian I. Schneider, Blu McCormick, Deanna M. Fierman, Carolyn J. Buck-Gengler, and Immanuel Barshi. Which modality is best for presenting navigation instructions? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(3):192-199, 2013. Google Scholar
  10. Mary Hegarty, Anthony E. Richardson, Daniel R. Montello, Kristin Lovelace, and Ilavanil Subbiah. Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence, 30(5):425-447, 2002. Google Scholar
  11. David A. Hensher and Fred L. Mannering. Hazard-based duration models and their application to transport analysis. Transport Reviews, 14(1):63-82, 1994. Google Scholar
  12. David W. Hosmer, Stanley Lemeshow, and Susanne May. Applied survival analysis. Wiley Blackwell, 2011. Google Scholar
  13. Christian Kray, Christian Elting, Katri Laakso, and Volker Coors. Presenting route instructions on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI'03, pages 117-124, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. Google Scholar
  14. Andrew J. May, Tracy Ross, Steven H. Bayer, and Mikko J. Tarkiainen. Pedestrian navigation aids: information requirements and design implications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7(6):331-338, 2003. Google Scholar
  15. Pierre-Emmanuel Michon and Michel Denis. When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT'01, pages 292-305. Springer, 2001. Google Scholar
  16. Daniel R. Montello. Navigation, chapter 7, pages 257-294. Cambridge University Press, 2005. Google Scholar
  17. Daniel R. Montello and Martin Raubal. Functions and applications of spatial cognition. In David Waller and Lynn Nadel, editors, Handbook of Spatial Cognition, pages 249-264. American Psychological Association, 2012. Google Scholar
  18. Daniel R. Montello and Corina Sas. Human Factors of Wayfinding in Navigation, pages 2003-2008. CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, Ltd., 2006. Google Scholar
  19. Martin Raubal and Stephan Winter. Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In International Conference on Geographic Information Science, GIScience'02, pages 243-259. Springer, 2002. Google Scholar
  20. Kai-Florian Richter and Matt Duckham. Simplest instructions: Finding easy-to-describe routes for navigation. In International Conference on Geographic Information Science, GIScience'08, pages 274-289. Springer, 2008. Google Scholar
  21. Tracy Ross and S. Brade. An empirical study to determine guidelines for optimum timing of route guidance instructions. In Design of the Driver Interface, pages 1-5. IEE, 1995. Google Scholar
  22. Tracy Ross, Gill Vaughan, and Colette Nicolle. Design guidelines for route guidance systems: Development process and an empirical example for timing of guidance instructions. In Y. Ian Noy, editor, Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces, pages 139-152. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., 1997. Google Scholar
  23. Jan M. Schraagen. Information presentation in in-car navigation systems. Driving future vehicles, pages 171-185, 1993. Google Scholar
  24. Terry Therneau. A package for survival analysis in S. R package version 2.37-4, 2014. Google Scholar
  25. Martin Tomko and Kai-Florian Richter. Defensive wayfinding: Incongruent information in route following. In International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT'15, pages 426-446. Springer International Publishing, 2015. Google Scholar
  26. Martin Tomko and Stephan Winter. Pragmatic construction of destination descriptions for urban environments. Spatial Cognition &Computation, 9(1):1-29, 2009. Google Scholar
  27. Willem B. Verwey, Håkan Alm, John A. Groeger, Wiel H. Janssen, Marja J. Kuiken, Jan M. Schraagen, Josef Schumann, Wim van Winsum, and Heinz Wontorra. GIDS functions. In Generic intelligent drive support, pages 113-146. Taylor &Francis, Inc., 1993. Google Scholar
  28. Brigitte Waldorf. Spatial patterns and processes in a longitudinal framework. International Regional Science Review, 26(3):269-288, 2003. Google Scholar
  29. Stephan Winter. Route adaptive selection of salient features. In International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT'03, pages 349-361. Springer, 2003. Google Scholar
  30. Markus Wuersch and David Caduff. Refined route instructions using topological stages of closeness. In Ki-Joune Li and Christelle Vangenot, editors, Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems: 5th International Workshop, W2GIS 2005, Lausanne, Switzerland, December 15-16, 2005. Proceedings, pages 31-41. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. Google Scholar
  31. Hubert Zimmer, Stefan Münzer, and Jörg Baus. From resource-adaptive navigation assistance to augmented cognition. In Matthew W. Crocker and Jörg Siekmann, editors, Resource-Adaptive Cognitive Processes, pages 35-53. Springer, 2010. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail