Document Open Access Logo

A Critical Look at Cryptogovernance of the Real World: Challenges for Spatial Representation and Uncertainty on the Blockchain (Short Paper)

Authors Benjamin Adams, Martin Tomko

PDF

File

Thumbnail PDF
PDF
LIPIcs.GISCIENCE.2018.18.pdf
  • Filesize: 333 kB
  • 6 pages

Document Identifiers

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Spatial-temporal systems
  • Applied computing → Environmental sciences
  • Social and professional topics → Socio-technical systems
Keywords
  • spatial information
  • spatial uncertainty
  • blockchain
  • smart contract
  • environmental management

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

Abstract

Innovation in distributed ledger technologies-blockchains and smart contracts-has been lauded as a game-changer for environmental governance and transparency. Here we critically consider how problems related to spatial representation and uncertainty complicate the picture, focusing on two cases. The first regards the impact of uncertainty on the transfer of spatial assets, and the second regards its impact on smart contract code that relies on software oracles that report sensor measurements of the physical world. Cryptogovernance of the environment will require substantial research on both these fronts if it is to become a reality.

Cite As Get BibTex

Benjamin Adams and Martin Tomko. A Critical Look at Cryptogovernance of the Real World: Challenges for Spatial Representation and Uncertainty on the Blockchain (Short Paper). In 10th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 114, pp. 18:1-18:6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GISCIENCE.2018.18

Author Details

Benjamin Adams
  • Department of Geography, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Martin Tomko
  • Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Australia

References

  1. Aanchal Anand, Matthew McKibbin, and Frank Pichel. Colored coins: Bitcoin, blockchain, and land administration. In Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, 2016. URL: http://cadasta.org/resources/white-papers/bitcoin-blockchain-land/.
  2. Vitalik Buterin. A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. 2014. URL: https://www.weusecoins.com/assets/pdf/library/Ethereum_white_paper-a_next_generation_smart_contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf.
  3. Guillaume Chapron. The environment needs cryptogovernance. Nature, 545(7655):403, 2017. Google Scholar
  4. Konstantinos Christidis and Michael Devetsikiotis. Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access, 4:2292-2303, 2016. Google Scholar
  5. Boris Düdder and Omri Ross. Timber tracking: Reducing complexity of due diligence by using blockchain technology. SSRN, 2017. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3015219.
  6. Peter F Fisher. Models of uncertainty in spatial data. In P. A. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, and D. W. Rhind, editors, Geographical Information Systems, volume 1, book section 13, pages 191-205. Longman, Essex, UK, 2nd edition, 1999. Google Scholar
  7. Arthur Gervais, Ghassan O Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis, Hubert Ritzdorf, and Srdjan Capkun. On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 3-16. ACM, 2016. Google Scholar
  8. Mark Graham, Scott Hale, and Monica Stephens. Featured graphic: Digital divide: the geography of internet access. Environment and Planning A, 44(5):1009-1010, 2012. Google Scholar
  9. Alastair Lewis and Peter Edwards. Validate personal air-pollution sensors: Alastair lewis and peter edwards call on researchers to test the accuracy of low-cost monitoring devices before regulators are flooded with questionable air-quality data. Nature, 535(7610):29-32, 2016. Google Scholar
  10. Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 2008. URL: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
  11. Pradip Kumar Sharma, Seo Yeon Moon, and Jong Hyuk Park. Block-vn: A distributed blockchain based vehicular network architecture in smart city. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 13(1):84, 2017. Google Scholar
  12. Barry Smith and Achille C Varzi. Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philosophical and phenomenological research, pages 401-420, 2000. Google Scholar
  13. Nick Szabo. Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday, 2(9), 1997. Google Scholar
  14. Susan Walker, Ann L Brower, RT Stephens, and William G Lee. Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conservation Letters, 2(4):149-157, 2009. Google Scholar
  15. Mike Worboys and Matt Duckham. Monitoring qualitative spatiotemporal change for geosensor networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(10):1087-1108, 2006. Google Scholar
  16. Xiwei Xu, Cesare Pautasso, Liming Zhu, Vincent Gramoli, Alexander Ponomarev, An Binh Tran, and Shiping Chen. The blockchain as a software connector. In Software Architecture (WICSA), 2016 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on, pages 182-191. IEEE, 2016. Google Scholar
  17. Yong Yuan and Fei-Yue Wang. Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems. In Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on, pages 2663-2668. IEEE, 2016. Google Scholar
Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact