Document Open Access Logo

A Case for Geographic Masses

Author Brandon S. Plewe

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.COSIT.2019.14.pdf
  • Filesize: 2.56 MB
  • 14 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Brandon S. Plewe
  • Department of Geography, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States

Cite As Get BibTex

Brandon S. Plewe. A Case for Geographic Masses. In 14th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 142, pp. 14:1-14:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2019.14

Abstract

Geographic masses, the stuff we deal with that cannot be categorized as geographic objects, comprise a crucial but largely unrecognized component of the core ontology of geographic information. Although masses have been rarely acknowledged in GIScience, they appear in geographic discourse just as often as objects. A concise but consistent formal definition of a geographic mass particular, which distinguishes a mass from an object, can be applied to any endurant phenomena, enabling a richer understanding of the geographic milieu, and more informed decision making during modeling and analysis processes.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Computing methodologies → Ontology engineering
  • Computing methodologies → Spatial and physical reasoning
Keywords
  • Ontology
  • Masses

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

References

  1. Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd Edition, 2000. URL: http://oed.com/.
  2. Harry C. Bunt. Mass Terms and Model-theoretic Semantics, volume 42 of Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 1985. Google Scholar
  3. Roberto Casati and Achille C Varzi. Parts and places: The structures of spatial representation. MIT Press, 1999. Google Scholar
  4. Vere C Chappell. Stuff and things. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, volume 71, pages 61-76. JSTOR, 1970-1971. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544801.
  5. Helen Couclelis. A Typology of Geographic Entities with Ill-defined Boundaries. In Peter A. Burrough and Andrew U. Frank, editors, Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, pages 45-55. London: Taylor and Francis, 1996. URL: https://books.google.com/books?id=r-2i_hKbx9gC&pg=PA45.
  6. Anthony Galton. Desiderata for a Spatio-temporal Geo-ontology. In Werner Kuhn, Michael F. Worboys, and Sabine Timpf, editors, Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic Information Science (COSIT 2003), pages 1-12. Berlin: Springer, 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_1.
  7. Anthony Galton and Riichiro Mizoguchi. The Water Falls but the Waterfall does not Fall: New perspectives on Objects, Process and Events. Applied Ontology, 4(2):71-107, 2009. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/309d/2ba88406bff2f545eec8086d20673287070f.pdf.
  8. A. Gangemi, N. Guarino, C. Masolo, A. Oltramari, and L. Schneider. Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE. In A. Gómez-Pére and V.R. Benjamins, editors, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web, 13th International Conference, EKAW 2002, pages 166-181. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2002. Google Scholar
  9. Brendan S Gillon. Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and philosophy, 15(6):597-639, 1992. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628112.
  10. Nelson Goodman. The Structure of Appearance, 3rd Edition, volume 53 of Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1951/1977. Google Scholar
  11. Jorge J.E. Gracia. Metaphysics and Its Task: The Search for the Categorial Foundation of Knowledge. State University of New York Press, 1999. URL: https://books.google.com/books?id=_5JQKKsZIgUC.
  12. Richard E. Grandy. Stuff and things. Synthese, 21(3/4):479-485, 1975. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4110-5_15.
  13. Heinrich Herre. Persistence, change, and the integration of objects and processes in GFO. In Vesselin Petrov and Adam C. Scarfe, editors, Dynamic Being: Essays in Process-Relational Ontology, pages 337-354. Cambridge Scholar Publishing, 2015. Google Scholar
  14. Heinrich Herre. Formal Ontology-A New Discipline Between Philosophy, Formal Logic, and Artificial Intelligence, 2016. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/62af/ab4d0412df9519c1e7004ed3f5fc6fc59096.pdf.
  15. Ray Jackendoff. Parts and Boundaries. In B. Levin and S. Pinker, editors, Lexical and Conceptual Semantics, pages 9-45. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992. Google Scholar
  16. George Lakoff. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, 1987. Google Scholar
  17. Henry Laycock. Words without Objects: Semantics, Ontology, and Logic for Non-Singularity. Oxford University Press, 2006. Google Scholar
  18. Friederike Moltmann. Part structures, integrity, and the mass-count distinction. Synthese, 116:75-111, 1998. URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005046308299.
  19. David Nicolas. Mass nouns and plural logic. Linguistics and philosophy, 31(2):211-244, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9033-2.
  20. Alex Oliver and Timothy Smiley. Plural Logic: Revised and Enlarged. Oxford University Press, 2013. Google Scholar
  21. Adam Pease. Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO). URL: http://www.adampease.org/OP/.
  22. Donna Peuquet, Barry Smith, and B. Brogaard, editors. The Ontology of Fields: Report of a Specialist Meeting held under the auspices of the Varenius Project. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, 1999. URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/33d7c1pt.
  23. Roberto Poli. Ontology: The Categorial Stance. In Roberto Poli and Johanna Seibt, editors, Theory and Applications of Ontology: Philosophical Perspectives, pages 1-22. Springer, 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8845-1_1.
  24. Willard V.O. Quine. Word and object: An inquiry into the linguistic mechanisms of objective reference. John Wiley, 1960. Google Scholar
  25. Johanna Seibt. Particulars. In Roberto Poli and Johanna Seibt, editors, Theory and Applications of Ontology: Philosophical Perspectives, pages 23-55. Springer, 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8845-1_2.
  26. Peter M. Simons. Parts: a study in Ontology. Oxford University Press, 1987. Google Scholar
  27. Barry Smith and Pierre Grenon. BFO: Basic Formal Ontology, 2002. URL: http://basic-formal-ontology.org/.
  28. Barry Smith and David Mark. Geographical Categories: an Ontological Investigation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(7):591-612, 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810110061199.
  29. Mark Steen. The Metaphysics of Mass Expressions. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, 2012. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics-massexpress/.
  30. Peter F. Strawson. Individuals. London: Methuen, 1959. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact