Document Open Access Logo

Schematic Maps and Indoor Wayfinding

Authors Christina Bauer, Bernd Ludwig

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.COSIT.2019.23.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.89 MB
  • 14 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Christina Bauer
  • Chair of Information Science, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Bernd Ludwig
  • Chair of Information Science, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

Cite As Get BibTex

Christina Bauer and Bernd Ludwig. Schematic Maps and Indoor Wayfinding. In 14th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 142, pp. 23:1-23:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2019.23

Abstract

Schematic maps are often discussed as an adequate alternative of displaying wayfinding information compared to detailed map designs. However, these depictions have not yet been compared and analyzed in-depth. In this paper, we present a user study that evaluates the wayfinding behaviour of participants either using a detailed floor plan or a schematic map that only shows the route to follow and landmarks. The study was conducted in an indoor real-world scenario. The depictions were presented with the help of a mobile navigation system. We analyzed the time it took to understand the wayfinding instruction and the workload of the users. Moreover, we examined how the depictions were visually perceived with a mobile eye tracker. Results show that wayfinders who use the detailed map spend more visual attention on the instructions. Nevertheless, the depiction does not help to solve the task: they also needed more time to orient themselves. Regarding the workload and the wayfinding errors no differences were found.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Location based services
  • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI
Keywords
  • Wayfinding
  • schematic maps
  • eye tracking
  • indoor environment

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

References

  1. Gary L. Allen. Cognitive Abilities in the Service of Wayfinding: A Functional Approach. The Professional Geographer, 51(4):555-561, 1999. Google Scholar
  2. Christina Bauer, Manuel Müller, and Bernd Ludwig. Indoor Pedestrian Navigation Systems: Is More Than One Landmark Needed for Efficient Self-localization? In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM '16, pages 75-79, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM. Google Scholar
  3. Stefan Bienk, Markus Kattenbeck, Bernd Ludwig, Manuel Müller, and Christina Ohm. I want to view it my way: Interfaces to mobile maps should adapt to the user’s orientation skills. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, pages 34:1-34:9, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google Scholar
  4. Anders Bouwer, Frank Nack, and Abdallah El Ali. Lost in Navigation: Evaluating a Mobile Map App for a Fair. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ICMI '12, pages 173-180, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google Scholar
  5. Andreas Butz, Jörg Baus, Antonio Krüger, and Marco Lohse. A Hybrid Indoor Navigation System. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '01, pages 25-32, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM. Google Scholar
  6. Andreas Ettlinger, Hans-Berndt Neuner, and Thomas Burgess. Smartphone Sensor-Based Orientation Determination for Indoor-Navigation. In Georg Gartner and Haosheng Huang, editors, Progress in Location-Based Services, pages 49-68. Springer, Cham, 2017. Google Scholar
  7. Conrad Franke and Jürgen Schweikart. Mental representation of landmarks on maps: Investigating cartographic visualization methods with eye tracking technology. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 17(1-2):20-38, 2017. Google Scholar
  8. Christian Freksa. Spatial aspects of task-specific wayfinding maps. In Visual and spatial reasoning in design, pages 15-32, Sydney, 1999. Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney. Google Scholar
  9. Georg Gartner and Verena Radoczky. About the Role of Cartographic Presentation for Wayfinding. In Emmanuel Stefanakis, Michael P. Peterson, Costas Armenakis, and Vasilis Delis, editors, Geographic Hypermedia: Concepts and Systems, pages 381-398, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006. Springer. Google Scholar
  10. Ioannis Giannopoulos. Supporting Wayfinding Through Mobile Gaze-Based Interaction. Dissertation, ETH-Zürich, 2016. Google Scholar
  11. Reginald G Golledge. Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In Reginald G Golledge, editor, Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes, pages 5-45, 1999. Google Scholar
  12. Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati, editors, Human Mental Workload, volume 52 of Advances in Psychology, pages 139-183. North-Holland, 1988. Google Scholar
  13. Haosheng Huang and Georg Gartner. A Survey of Mobile Indoor Navigation Systems. In Georg Gartner and Felix Ortag, editors, Cartography in Central and Eastern Europe: CEE 2009, pages 305-319, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer. Google Scholar
  14. Markus Kattenbeck. Empirically Measuring Salience of Objects for Use in Pedestrian Navigation. Dissertation, Universität Regensburg, 2016. Google Scholar
  15. Peter Kiefer, Ioannis Giannopoulos, and Martin Raubal. Where Am I? Investigating Map Matching During Self-Localization With Mobile Eye Tracking in an Urban Environment. Transactions in GIS, 18(5):660-686, 2014. Google Scholar
  16. Alexander Klippel, Kai-Florian Richter, and Stefan Hansen. Wayfinding Choreme Maps. In Stéphane Bres and Robert Laurini, editors, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Visual Information and Information Systems, pages 94-108. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006. Google Scholar
  17. Christian Kray, Christian Elting, Katri Laakso, and Volker Coors. Presenting Route Instructions on Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 03, pages 117-124, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. Google Scholar
  18. Alexandra Lorenz, Cornelia Thierbach, Nina Baur, and Thomas H. Kolbe. Map design aspects, route complexity, or social background? Factors influencing user satisfaction with indoor navigation maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(3):201-209, 2013. Google Scholar
  19. Kristin L. Lovelace, Mary Hegarty, and Daniel R. Montello. Elements of Good Route Directions in Familiar and Unfamiliar Environments. In Christian Freksa and David M. Mark, editors, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, pages 65-82, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999. Springer. Google Scholar
  20. David M. Mark, Christian Freksa, Stephen C. Hirtle, Robert Lloyd, and Barbara Tversky. Cognitive models of geographical space. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(8):747-774, 1999. Google Scholar
  21. Daniel R. Montello. Navigation. In A. Miyake and P. Shah, editors, The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, pages 257-294. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US, 2005. Google Scholar
  22. Daniel R Montello and Corina Sas. Human factors of wayfinding in navigation. In W. Karwowski, editor, International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, pages 2003-2008. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, London, England, 2006. Google Scholar
  23. Stefan Münzer and Christoph Hölscher. Development and validation of a self-report measure of environmental spatial strategies. Diagnostica, 57(3):111-125, 2011. Google Scholar
  24. Stefan Münzer and Christoph Stahl. Learning Routes from Visualizations for Indoor Wayfinding: Presentation Modes and Individual Differences. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 11(4):281-312, 2011. Google Scholar
  25. Christina Ohm, Stefan Bienk, Markus Kattenbeck, Bernd Ludwig, and Manuel Müller. Towards interfaces of mobile pedestrian navigation systems adapted to the user’s orientation skills. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 26:121-134, 2016. Google Scholar
  26. Christina Ohm, Manuel Müller, and Bernd Ludwig. Evaluating indoor pedestrian navigation interfaces using mobile eye tracking. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 17(1-2):89-120, 2017. Google Scholar
  27. Christina Ohm, Manuel Müller, Bernd Ludwig, and Stefan Bienk. Where is the landmark? Eye tracking studies in large-scale indoor environments. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Eye Tracking for Spatial Research co-located with the 8th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2014), 2014. Google Scholar
  28. Timo Partala and Miikka Salminen. User Experience of Photorealistic Urban Pedestrian Navigation. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 204-207, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google Scholar
  29. Arto Puikkonen, Ari-Heikki Sarjanoja, Merja Haveri, Jussi Huhtala, and Jonna Häkkilä. Towards Designing Better Maps for Indoor Navigation: Experiences from a Case Study. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM '09, pages 16:1-16:4, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google Scholar
  30. Verena Schnitzler, Ioannis Giannopoulos, Christoph Hölscher, and Iva Barisic. The Interplay of Pedestrian Navigation, Wayfinding Devices, and Environmental Features in Indoor Settings. In Proceedings of the 9th Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, ETRA '16, pages 85-93, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM. Google Scholar
  31. Nanja J. J. M. Smets, Guido M. te Brake, Mark A. Neerincx, and Jasper Lindenberg. Effects of Mobile Map Orientation and Tactile Feedback on Navigation Speed and Situation Awareness. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI '08, pages 73-80, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google Scholar
  32. Barbara Tversky and Paul U. Lee. Pictorial and Verbal Tools for Conveying Routes. In Christian Freksa and David M. Mark, editors, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, pages 51-64, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999. Springer. Google Scholar
  33. P. Viaene, A. Vanclooster, K. Ooms, and P. De Maeyer. Thinking aloud in search of landmark characteristics in an indoor environment. In Ubiquitous Positioning Indoor Navigation and Location Based Service (UPINLBS), pages 103-110, 2014. Google Scholar
  34. Dirk Wenig, Alexander Steenbergen, Johannes Schöning, Brent Hecht, and Rainer Malaka. ScrollingHome: Bringing Image-based Indoor Navigation to Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI '16, pages 400-406, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM. Google Scholar
  35. Jan M. Wiener, Simon J. Büchner, and Christoph Hölscher. Taxonomy of Human Wayfinding Tasks: A Knowledge-Based Approach. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 9(2):152-165, 2009. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact