Document Open Access Logo

Diversity in News Recommendation (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 19482)

Authors Abraham Bernstein, Claes de Vreese, Natali Helberger, Wolfgang Schulz, Katharina Zweig, Christian Baden, Michael A. Beam, Marc P. Hauer, Lucien Heitz, Pascal Jürgens, Christian Katzenbach, Benjamin Kille, Beate Klimkiewicz, Wiebke Loosen, Judith Moeller, Goran Radanovic, Guy Shani, Nava Tintarev, Suzanne Tolmeijer, Wouter van Atteveldt, Sanne Vrijenhoek, Theresa Zueger

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

DagMan.9.1.43.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.56 MB
  • 19 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Abraham Bernstein
  • Universität Zürich, CH
Claes de Vreese
  • University of Amsterdam, NL
Natali Helberger
  • University of Amsterdam, NL
Wolfgang Schulz
  • Universität Hamburg, DE
Katharina Zweig
  • Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, DE
Christian Baden
  • The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, IL
Michael A. Beam
  • Kent State University, US
Marc P. Hauer
  • Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, DE
Lucien Heitz
  • Universität Zürich, CH
Pascal Jürgens
  • Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, DE
Christian Katzenbach
  • Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, DE
Benjamin Kille
  • Technische Universität Berlin, DE
Beate Klimkiewicz
  • University Jagiellonski, PL
Wiebke Loosen
  • Leibniz Institute for Media Research, Hans-Bredow-Institut, DE
Judith Moeller
  • University of Amsterdam, NL
Goran Radanovic
  • Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, DE
Guy Shani
  • Ben Gurion University, IL
Nava Tintarev
  • Maastricht University, NL
Suzanne Tolmeijer
  • Universität Zürich, CH
Wouter van Atteveldt
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, NL
Sanne Vrijenhoek
  • University of Amsterdam, NL
Theresa Zueger
  • Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, DE

Funding

Abraham Bernstein, Lucien, Heitz, and Suzanne Tolmeijer would like to thank the Haslerstiftung for their generous support of their their reserach on news recommender systems.

Acknowledgements

The participants wish to express their gratitude to Schloss Dagstuhl for their strong support and hosting of this workshop. The editors want to thank all participants for their contributions to the Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop Manifesto.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Abraham Bernstein, Claes de Vreese, Natali Helberger, Wolfgang Schulz, Katharina Zweig, Christian Baden, Michael A. Beam, Marc P. Hauer, Lucien Heitz, Pascal Jürgens, Christian Katzenbach, Benjamin Kille, Beate Klimkiewicz, Wiebke Loosen, Judith Moeller, Goran Radanovic, Guy Shani, Nava Tintarev, Suzanne Tolmeijer, Wouter van Atteveldt, Sanne Vrijenhoek, and Theresa Zueger. Diversity in News Recommendation (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 19482). In Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 43-61, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagMan.9.1.43

Abstract

News diversity in the media has for a long time been a foundational and uncontested basis for ensuring that the communicative needs of individuals and society at large are met. Today, people increasingly rely on online content and recommender systems to consume information challenging the traditional concept of news diversity. In addition, the very concept of diversity, which differs between disciplines, will need to be re-evaluated requiring an interdisciplinary investigation, which requires a new level of mutual cooperation between computer scientists, social scientists, and legal scholars. Based on the outcome of a interdisciplinary workshop, we have the following recommendations, directed at researchers, funders, legislators, regulators, and the media industry: - Conduct interdisciplinary research on news recommenders and diversity. - Create a safe harbor for academic research with industry data. - Strengthen the role of public values in news recommenders. - Create a meaningful governance framework for news recommenders. - Fund a joint lab to spearhead the needed interdisciplinary research, boost practical innovation, develop reference solutions, and transfer insights into practice.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Web services
  • Information systems → Information retrieval diversity
  • Applied computing → Psychology
  • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI
  • Applied computing → Sociology
  • Information systems → Digital libraries and archives
  • Human-centered computing → HCI theory, concepts and models
  • Applied computing → Economics
Keywords
  • News
  • recommender systems
  • diversity

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

References

  1. Sally W Aboelela, Elaine Larson, Suzanne Bakken, Olveen Carrasquillo, Allan Formicola, Sherry A Glied, Janet Haas, and Kristine M Gebbie. Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health services research, 42(1p1):329-346, 2007. Google Scholar
  2. Charu C Aggarwal et al. Recommender systems, volume 1. Springer, 2016. Google Scholar
  3. Tali Aharoni, Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, and Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt. “be less of a slave to the news”: A texto-material perspective on news avoidance among young adults. Journalism Studies, 22(1):42-59, 2021. Google Scholar
  4. Timothy Garton Ash. Free speech: Ten principles for a connected world. Yale University Press, 2016. Google Scholar
  5. Christian Baden and Nina Springer. Conceptualizing viewpoint diversity in news discourse. Journalism, 18(2):176-194, 2017. Google Scholar
  6. Edwmin C Baker. Media concentration and democracy. why ownership matters, 2007. Google Scholar
  7. Jack M Balkin. Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation. UCDL Rev., 51:1149, 2017. Google Scholar
  8. Michael A Beam. Automating the news: How personalized news recommender system design choices impact news reception. Communication Research, 41(8):1019-1041, 2014. Google Scholar
  9. Mark Bevir. Key concepts in governance. Sage, 2008. Google Scholar
  10. Balázs Bodó. Selling news to audiences - a qualitative inquiry into the emerging logics of algorithmic news personalization in european quality news media. Digital Journalism, 7(8):1054-1075, 2019. Google Scholar
  11. James Bohman. Political communication and the epistemic value of diversity: Deliberation and legitimation in media societies. Communication Theory, 17(4):348-355, 2007. Google Scholar
  12. Nicholas A Bowman. College diversity courses and cognitive development among students from privileged and marginalized groups. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2(3):182, 2009. Google Scholar
  13. Darnell Cole and Ji Zhou. Diversity and collegiate experiences affecting self-perceived gains in critical thinking: Which works, and who benefits? The Journal of General Education, 63(1):15-34, 2014. Google Scholar
  14. Myra Marx Ferree, William Anthony Gamson, Dieter Rucht, and Jürgen Gerhards. Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge University Press, 2002. Google Scholar
  15. Richard Fletcher and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? a cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4):476-498, 2017. Google Scholar
  16. Kathleen M Goodman. The effects of viewpoint diversity and racial diversity on need for cognition. Journal of College Student Development, 58(6):853-871, 2017. Google Scholar
  17. Jonathan Haidt and Lee Jussim. Psychological science and viewpoint diversity. APS Observer, 29(2), 2016. Google Scholar
  18. Mario Haim, Andreas Graefe, and Hans-Bernd Brosius. Burst of the filter bubble? effects of personalization on the diversity of google news. Digital journalism, 6(3):330-343, 2018. Google Scholar
  19. Thomas Hanitzsch and Tim P Vos. Journalism beyond democracy: A new look into journalistic roles in political and everyday life. Journalism, 19(2):146-164, 2018. Google Scholar
  20. Jaron Harambam, Dimitrios Bountouridis, Mykola Makhortykh, and Joris Van Hoboken. Designing for the better by taking users into account: A qualitative evaluation of user control mechanisms in (news) recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 69-77, 2019. Google Scholar
  21. Jaron Harambam, Natali Helberger, and Joris van Hoboken. Democratizing algorithmic news recommenders: how to materialize voice in a technologically saturated media ecosystem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133):20180088, 2018. Google Scholar
  22. Natali Helberger. On the democratic role of news recommenders. Digital Journalism, 7(8):993-1012, 2019. Google Scholar
  23. Natali Helberger, Kari Karppinen, and Lucia D’acunto. Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems. Information, Communication & Society, 21(2):191-207, 2018. Google Scholar
  24. David Held. Models of democracy. Stanford University Press, 2006. Google Scholar
  25. P Humphreys. Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem: Regulating Media. The Licensing and Supervision of Broadcasting in Six Countries. New York 1996. RUNDFUNK UND FERNSEHEN, 46:560-563, 1998. Google Scholar
  26. Yucheng Jin, Nava Tintarev, Nyi Nyi Htun, and Katrien Verbert. Effects of personal characteristics in control-oriented user interfaces for music recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 30(2):199-249, 2020. Google Scholar
  27. Natascha Just. Measuring media concentration and diversity: new approaches and instruments in europe and the us. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1):97-117, 2009. Google Scholar
  28. Mozhgan Karimi, Dietmar Jannach, and Michael Jugovac. News recommender systems-survey and roads ahead. Information Processing & Management, 54(6):1203-1227, 2018. Google Scholar
  29. Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick and Jingbo Meng. Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61(2):349-368, 2011. Google Scholar
  30. Matevž Kunaver and Tomaž Požrl. Diversity in recommender systems-a survey. Knowledge-based systems, 123:154-162, 2017. Google Scholar
  31. Felicia Loecherbach, Judith Moeller, Damian Trilling, and Wouter van Atteveldt. The unified framework of media diversity: A systematic literature review. Digital Journalism, 8(5):605-642, 2020. Google Scholar
  32. C. Neuberg and F. Lobgis. Die Bedeutung des Internets im Rahmen der Vielfaltssicherung. VISTAS Verlag, 2010. Google Scholar
  33. Hannu Nieminen. Clifford G. Christians, Theodore L. Glasser, Denis McQuail, Kaarle Nordenstreng, and Robert A. White (2009). Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Media & viestintä, 33(3), 2010. Google Scholar
  34. F Saeys. Western broadcast models: Structure, conduct and performance, 2007. Google Scholar
  35. Wolfgang Schulz. Kontrolle vorherrschender Meinungsmacht-Dekonstruktion eines medienrechtlichen Schlüsselbegriffs. AfP, 48(5):373-379, 2017. Google Scholar
  36. Wolfgang Schulz. Kommunikationsgrundrechte vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht. DGRI Jahrbuch 2018, page 199, 2018. Google Scholar
  37. Morten Skovsgaard and Kim Andersen. Conceptualizing news avoidance: Towards a shared understanding of different causes and potential solutions. Journalism Studies, 21(4):459-476, 2020. Google Scholar
  38. Rachael Craufurd Smith. Kari karppinen, rethinking media pluralism, 2014. Google Scholar
  39. Rachael Craufurd Smith and Damian Tambini. Measuring media plurality in the united kingdom: Policy choices and regulatory challenges. Journal of Media Law, 4(1):35-63, 2012. Google Scholar
  40. Cass R Sunstein. Designing democracy: What constitutions do. Oxford University Press, 2001. Google Scholar
  41. Peggy Valcke, Robert Picard, Miklos Sükösd, Beata Klimkiewicz, Brankica Petkovic, Cinzia dal Zotto, and Robin Kerremans. The european media pluralism monitor: Bridging law, economics and media studies as a first step towards risk-based regulation in media markets. Journal of Media Law, 2(1):85-113, 2010. Google Scholar
  42. Jan Van Cuilenburg. On competition, access and diversity in media, old and new: Some remarks for communications policy in the information age. New media & society, 1(2):183-207, 1999. Google Scholar
  43. Tim P Vos and J David Wolfgang. Journalists’ normative constructions of political viewpoint diversity. Journalism Studies, 19(6):764-781, 2018. Google Scholar
  44. Mark Wilhelm, Ajith Ramanathan, Alexander Bonomo, Sagar Jain, Ed H Chi, and Jennifer Gillenwater. Practical diversified recommendations on youtube with determinantal point processes. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 2165-2173, 2018. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact