Feedback Systems for Students Solving Problems Related to Polynomials of Degree Two or Lower

Authors Luke Adrian Gubbins Bayzid , Ana Maria Reis D'Azevedo Breda , Eugénio Alexandre Miguel Rocha , José Manuel Dos Santos Dos Santos



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.ICPEC.2022.5.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.54 MB
  • 10 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Luke Adrian Gubbins Bayzid
  • Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, Portugal
  • Thematic Line GEOMETRIX, University of Aveiro, Portugal
Ana Maria Reis D'Azevedo Breda
  • Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, Portugal
  • Center for Research & Development in Mathematics and Applications, University of Aveiro, Portugal
Eugénio Alexandre Miguel Rocha
  • Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, Portugal
  • Center for Research & Development in Mathematics and Applications, University of Aveiro, Portugal
José Manuel Dos Santos Dos Santos
  • Centre for Research and Innovation in Education (inED), Escola Superior de Educação - Politechnic of Porto, Portugal

Cite AsGet BibTex

Luke Adrian Gubbins Bayzid, Ana Maria Reis D'Azevedo Breda, Eugénio Alexandre Miguel Rocha, and José Manuel Dos Santos Dos Santos. Feedback Systems for Students Solving Problems Related to Polynomials of Degree Two or Lower. In Third International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2022). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 102, pp. 5:1-5:10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)
https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2022.5

Abstract

In this paper, we present the first attempts to design and implement an algorithm that effectively responds to errors in a student’s resolution in problems related to polynomials of degree two or lower. The algorithm analyzes the student’s input by comparing pre-established resolution patterns. The obtained results of the implementation show that the algorithm is effective at the classes of problems created within the project’s scope. Future work will concern the expansion of the number of classes to other common types of problems, such as higher-degree polynomials, and its use at a large scale using open-source software with CAS capabilities.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Mathematics of computing
  • Computing methodologies
Keywords
  • Automatic feedback
  • Algorithms
  • Algebraic systems

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Anderson Pinheiro Cavalcanti, Arthur Barbosa, Ruan Carvalho, Fred Freitas, Yi-Shan Tsai, Dragan Gašević, and Rafael Ferreira Mello. Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2:100027, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027.
  2. John Hattie and Helen Timperley. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1):81-112, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
  3. Mark Jellicoe and Alex Forsythe. The development and validation of the feedback in learning scale (fls). Frontiers in Education, 4, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00084.
  4. Raymond W. Kulhavy and William A. Stock. Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4):279-308, 1989. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320096.
  5. Susanne Narciss. Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3:125-144, 2008. URL: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203880869.ch11.
  6. Susanne Narciss, Elsa Hammer, Gregor Damnik, Kerstin Kisielski, and Hermann Körndle. Promoting prospective teacher competencies for designing, implementing, evaluating, and adapting interactive formative feedback strategies. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 20(2):261-278, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725720971887.
  7. Ernesto Panadero and Anastasiya A. Lipnevich. A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35:100416, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416.
  8. Scott A. Schartel. Giving feedback – an integral part of education. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 26(1):77-87, 2012. Challenges in Anaesthesia Education. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2012.02.003.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail