Interactive Visualization for Fostering Trust in ML (Dagstuhl Seminar 22351)

Authors Polo Chau, Alex Endert, Daniel A. Keim, Daniela Oelke and all authors of the abstracts in this report



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

DagRep.12.8.103.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.99 MB
  • 14 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Polo Chau
  • Georgia Institute of Technology - Atlanta, US
Alex Endert
  • Georgia Institute of Technology - Atlanta, US
Daniel A. Keim
  • Universität Konstanz, DE,
Daniela Oelke
  • Hochschule Offenburg, DE
and all authors of the abstracts in this report

Cite AsGet BibTex

Polo Chau, Alex Endert, Daniel A. Keim, and Daniela Oelke. Interactive Visualization for Fostering Trust in ML (Dagstuhl Seminar 22351). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 12, Issue 8, pp. 103-116, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.12.8.103

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence continues to impact a broad variety of domains, application areas, and people. However, interpretability, understandability, responsibility, accountability, and fairness of the algorithms' results - all crucial for increasing humans' trust into the systems - are still largely missing. The purpose of this seminar is to understand how these components factor into the holistic view of trust. Further, this seminar seeks to identify design guidelines and best practices for how to build interactive visualization systems to calibrate trust.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Computing methodologies → Artificial intelligence
  • Computing methodologies → Machine learning
  • Human-centered computing → Visualization
Keywords
  • accountability
  • artificial intelligence
  • explainability
  • fairness
  • interactive visualization
  • machine learning
  • responsibility
  • trust
  • understandability

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail