Search Results

We investigate a fundamental question regarding a benchmark class of shapes in one of the simplest, yet most widely utilized abstract models of algorithmic tile self-assembly. More specifically, we study the directed tile complexity of a k × N thin rectangle in Winfree’s ubiquitous abstract Tile Assembly Model, assuming that cooperative binding cannot be enforced (temperature-1 self-assembly) and that tiles are allowed to be placed at most one step into the third dimension (just-barely 3D). While the directed tile complexities of a square and a scaled-up version of any algorithmically specified shape at temperature 1 in just-barely 3D are both asymptotically the same as they are (respectively) at temperature 2 in 2D, the (nearly tight) bounds on the directed tile complexity of a thin rectangle at temperature 2 in 2D are not currently known to hold at temperature 1 in just-barely 3D. Motivated by this discrepancy, we establish new lower and upper bounds on the directed tile complexity of a thin rectangle at temperature 1 in just-barely 3D. The proof of our upper bound is based on the construction of a novel, just-barely 3D temperature-1 self-assembling counter. Each value of the counter is comprised of k-2 digits, represented in a geometrically staggered fashion within k rows. This nearly optimal digit density, along with the base of the counter, which is proportional to N^{1/(k-1)}, results in an upper bound of O(N^{1/(k-1)} + log N), and is an asymptotic improvement over the previous state-of-the-art upper bound. On our way to proving our lower bound, we develop a new, more powerful type of specialized Window Movie Lemma that lets us bound the number of "sufficiently similar" ways to assign glues to a set (rather than a sequence) of fixed locations. Consequently, our lower bound, Ω(N^{1/k}), is also an asymptotic improvement over the previous state-of-the-art lower bound.