DROPS

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.8

Intersection Theorems: A Potential Approach to Proof Complexity Lower Bounds

Authors: Yaroslav Alekseev and Nikita Gaevoy

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract

Recently, Göös et al. [Göös et al., 2024] showed that Res ⋏ uSA = RevRes in the following sense: if a formula φ has refutations of size at most s and width/degree at most w in both Res and uSA, then there is a refutation for φ of size at most poly(s ⋅ 2^w) in RevRes. Their proof relies on the TFNP characterization of the aforementioned proof systems. In our work, we give a direct and simplified proof of this result, simultaneously achieving better bounds: we show that if for a formula φ there are refutations of size at most s in both Res and uSA, then there is a refutation of φ of size at most poly(s) in RevRes. This potentially allows us to "lift" size lower bounds from RevRes to Res for the formulas for which there are upper bounds in uSA. This kind of lifting was not possible before because of the exponential blow-up in size from the width. Similarly, we improve the bounds in another intersection theorem from [Göös et al., 2024] by giving a direct proof of Res ⋏ uNS = RevResT. Finally, we generalize those intersection theorems to some proof systems for which we currently do not have a TFNP characterization. For example, we show that Res(⊕) ⋏ u-wRes(⊕) = RevRes(⊕), which effectively allows us to reduce the problem of proving Pigeonhole Principle lower bounds in Res(⊕) to proving Pigeonhole Principle lower bounds in RevRes(⊕), a potentially weaker proof system.

Cite as

Yaroslav Alekseev and Nikita Gaevoy. Intersection Theorems: A Potential Approach to Proof Complexity Lower Bounds. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 8:1-8:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alekseev_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.8,
  author =	{Alekseev, Yaroslav and Gaevoy, Nikita},
  title =	{{Intersection Theorems: A Potential Approach to Proof Complexity Lower Bounds}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252953},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof complexity, intersection theorems}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2025.13

Doubly-Periodic String Comparison

Authors: Nikita Gaevoy, Boris Zolotov, and Alexander Tiskin

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 331, 36th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2025)

Abstract

The longest common subsequence (LCS) problem is a fundamental algorithmic problem. Given a pair of strings, the problem asks for the length of the longest string that is a subsequence in both input strings. Among the many relatives of this problem, there is its natural version where one or both of input strings have periodic structure. The case where only one of the input strings is periodic has been considered before; in this work, we develop an efficient algorithm for the more difficult case where both input strings are periodic. The algorithm is based on the existing algebraic framework for the LCS problem, developed by the third author; in particular, we extend this framework to dealing with affine (i.e. doubly-infinite periodic) permutations instead of finite ones. Given input strings that are a k-repeat of a period of length m and an 𝓁-repeat of a period of length n, the resulting algorithm runs in time O(mn+n log n log k), which is a substantial improvement over existing approaches. The algorithm has been implemented by the first author; by running his code, one can process pairs of periodic input strings with lengths far beyond the reach of all known alternative algorithms.

Cite as

Nikita Gaevoy, Boris Zolotov, and Alexander Tiskin. Doubly-Periodic String Comparison. In 36th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 331, pp. 13:1-13:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gaevoy_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2025.13,
  author =	{Gaevoy, Nikita and Zolotov, Boris and Tiskin, Alexander},
  title =	{{Doubly-Periodic String Comparison}},
  booktitle =	{36th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-369-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{331},
  editor =	{Bonizzoni, Paola and M\"{a}kinen, Veli},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231079},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: String Comparison, periodic Strings, Longest common Subsequence, affine Hecke Monoid, affine sticky Braids}
}

Search Results

Documents authored by Gaevoy, Nikita

Intersection Theorems: A Potential Approach to Proof Complexity Lower Bounds

Abstract

Cite as

Doubly-Periodic String Comparison

Abstract

Cite as

Thanks for your feedback!

Could not send message