Search Results

Documents authored by Gokaj, Geri

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.7
Computing L_∞ Hausdorff Distances Under Translations: The Interplay of Dimensionality, Symmetry and Discreteness

Authors: Sebastian Angrick, Kevin Buchin, Geri Gokaj, and Marvin Künnemann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)

Abstract
To measure the similarity of the shape of point sets, rather than their mere closeness in space, various notions of a Hausdorff distance under translation have been investigated. Specifically, let P and Q denote point sets of n and m points, respectively, in ℝ^d. We consider the task of computing the minimum distance d(P,Q+τ) over an admissible set of translations τ ∈ T, where d(⋅, ⋅) denotes the Hausdorff distance under the L_∞-norm. As variants, we distinguish between continuous (T = ℝ^d) or discrete (T is a given finite set of t translations) as well as directed or undirected (choosing the directed or undirected Hausdorff distance for d(⋅, ⋅)). We seek to apply the paradigm of fine-grained complexity to understand the complexity of these variants, and in particular: How is the running time influenced by the dimension d, the relationship between n and m, and the specific choice of variant? As our main results, we obtain: - The asymmetric definition of the most studied variant, the continuous directed Hausdorff distance, results in an intrinsically asymmetric time complexity: While (Chan, SoCG'23) established a symmetric Õ((nm)^{d/2}) upper bound for all d ≥ 3 and proved it to be conditionally optimal for combinatorial algorithms whenever m ≤ n, we show that this lower bound does not hold for the case n ≪ m, by providing a combinatorial, almost-linear-time algorithm for d = 3 and n = m^{o(1)}. We further prove general, i.e., non-combinatorial, conditional lower bounds for d ≥ 3, in particular: (1) m^{⌊d/2⌋ - o(1)} for small n and (2) n^{d/2 - o(1)} for d = 3 and small m. - We observe that the directed and undirected case is closely related, in particular, all our lower bounds for d ≥ 3 hold for both the directed and undirected variant. A remarkable exception is the case of d = 1 for which we provide a conditional separation. Specifically, in contrast to the undirected variants being solvable in near-linear time (Rote, IPL'91), we show that the directed variants are at least as hard as the additive problem MaxConv LowerBound introduced in (Cygan, Mucha, Wegrzycki and Wlodarczyk, TALG'19). - We show that the discrete variants reduce to a variant of 3SUM for d ≤ 3. This gives a barrier in proving a tight lower bound of these variants under the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis (OVH); in contrast, the continuous variants admit a tight conditional lower bound under OVH in d = 2 (Bringmann, Nusser, JoCG'21). These results reveal an intricate interplay of dimensionality, symmetry and discreteness in determining the fine-grained complexity of computing Hausdorff distances under translation.
Cite as

Sebastian Angrick, Kevin Buchin, Geri Gokaj, and Marvin Künnemann. Computing L_∞ Hausdorff Distances Under Translations: The Interplay of Dimensionality, Symmetry and Discreteness. In 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 367, pp. 7:1-7:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{angrick_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.7,
  author =	{Angrick, Sebastian and Buchin, Kevin and Gokaj, Geri and K\"{u}nnemann, Marvin},
  title =	{{Computing L\underline∞ Hausdorff Distances Under Translations: The Interplay of Dimensionality, Symmetry and Discreteness}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-418-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{367},
  editor =	{Ahn, Hee-Kap and Hoffmann, Michael and Nayyeri, Amir},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258131},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hausdorff Distance, Fine-Grained Complexity, Computational Geometry, Translation-Invariant Similarity Measures}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.54
Approximating Pareto Sum via Bounded Monotone Min-Plus Convolution

Authors: Geri Gokaj, Marvin Künnemann, Sabine Storandt, and Carina Truschel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)

Abstract
The Pareto sum of two-dimensional point sets P and Q in ℝ² is defined as the skyline of the points in their Minkowski sum. The problem of efficiently computing the Pareto sum arises frequently in bi-criteria optimization algorithms. Prior work establishes that computing the Pareto sum of sets P and Q of size n suffers from conditional lower bounds that rule out strongly subquadratic O(n^{2-ε})-time algorithms, even when the output size is Θ(n). Naturally, we ask: How efficiently can we approximate Pareto sums, both in theory and practice? Can we beat the near-quadratic-time state of the art for exact algorithms? On the theoretical side, we formulate a notion of additively approximate Pareto sets and show that computing an approximate Pareto set is fine-grained equivalent to Bounded Monotone Min-Plus Convolution. Leveraging a remarkable Õ(n^{1.5})-time algorithm for the latter problem (Chi, Duan, Xie, Zhang; STOC '22), we thus obtain a strongly subquadratic (and conditionally optimal) approximation algorithm for computing Pareto sums. On the practical side, we engineer different algorithmic approaches for approximating Pareto sets on realistic instances. Our implementations enable a granular trade-off between approximation quality and running time/output size compared to the state of the art for exact algorithms established in (Funke, Hespe, Sanders, Storandt, Truschel; Algorithmica '25). Perhaps surprisingly, the (theoretical) connection to Bounded Monotone Min-Plus Convolution remains beneficial even for our implementations: in particular, we implement a simplified, yet still subquadratic version of an algorithm due to Chi, Duan, Xie and Zhang, which on some sufficiently large instances outperforms the competing quadratic-time approaches.
Cite as

Geri Gokaj, Marvin Künnemann, Sabine Storandt, and Carina Truschel. Approximating Pareto Sum via Bounded Monotone Min-Plus Convolution. In 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 367, pp. 54:1-54:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gokaj_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.54,
  author =	{Gokaj, Geri and K\"{u}nnemann, Marvin and Storandt, Sabine and Truschel, Carina},
  title =	{{Approximating Pareto Sum via Bounded Monotone Min-Plus Convolution}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)},
  pages =	{54:1--54:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-418-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{367},
  editor =	{Ahn, Hee-Kap and Hoffmann, Michael and Nayyeri, Amir},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.54},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258602},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.54},
  annote =	{Keywords: computational geometry, fine-grained complexity, algorithm engineering}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.42
(Multivariate) k-SUM as Barrier to Succinct Computation

Authors: Geri Gokaj, Marvin Künnemann, Sabine Storandt, and Carina Truschel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
How does the time complexity of a problem change when the input is given succinctly rather than explicitly? We study this question for several geometric problems defined on a set X of N points in ℤ^d. As succinct representation, we choose a sumset (or Minkowski sum) representation: Instead of receiving X explicitly, we are given sets A,B of n points that define X as A+B = {a+b∣ a ∈ A,b ∈ B}. We investigate the fine-grained complexity of this succinct version for several Õ(N)-time computable geometric primitives. Remarkably, we can tie their complexity tightly to the complexity of corresponding k-SUM problems. Specifically, we introduce as All-ints 3-SUM(n,n,k) the following multivariate, multi-output variant of 3-SUM: given sets A,B of size n and set C of size k, determine for all c ∈ C whether there are a ∈ A and b ∈ B with a+b = c. We obtain the following results: 1) Succinct closest L_∞-pair requires time N^{1-o(1)} under the 3-SUM hypothesis, while succinct furthest L_∞-pair can be solved in time Õ(n). 2) Succinct bichromatic closest L_∞-Pair requires time N^{1-o(1)} iff the 4-SUM hypothesis holds. 3) The following problems are fine-grained equivalent to All-ints 3-SUM(n,n,k): succinct skyline computation in 2D with output size k and succinct batched orthogonal range search with k given ranges. This establishes conditionally tight Õ(min{nk, N})-time algorithms for these problems. We obtain further connections with All-ints 3-SUM(n,n,k) for succinctly computing independent sets in unit interval graphs. Thus, (Multivariate) k-SUM problems precisely capture the barrier for enabling sumset-succinct computation for various geometric primitives.
Cite as

Geri Gokaj, Marvin Künnemann, Sabine Storandt, and Carina Truschel. (Multivariate) k-SUM as Barrier to Succinct Computation. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 42:1-42:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gokaj_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.42,
  author =	{Gokaj, Geri and K\"{u}nnemann, Marvin and Storandt, Sabine and Truschel, Carina},
  title =	{{(Multivariate) k-SUM as Barrier to Succinct Computation}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{42:1--42:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.42},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245101},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.42},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fine-grained complexity theory, sumsets, additive combinatorics, succinct inputs, computational geometry}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.55
Completeness Theorems for k-SUM and Geometric Friends: Deciding Fragments of Linear Integer Arithmetic

Authors: Geri Gokaj and Marvin Künnemann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
In the last three decades, the k-SUM hypothesis has emerged as a satisfying explanation of long-standing time barriers for a variety of algorithmic problems. Yet to this day, the literature knows of only few proven consequences of a refutation of this hypothesis. Taking a descriptive complexity viewpoint, we ask: What is the largest logically defined class of problems captured by the k-SUM problem? To this end, we introduce a class FOP_ℤ of problems corresponding to deciding sentences in Presburger arithmetic/linear integer arithmetic over finite subsets of integers. We establish two large fragments for which the k-SUM problem is complete under fine-grained reductions: 1) The k-SUM problem is complete for deciding the sentences with k existential quantifiers. 2) The 3-SUM problem is complete for all 3-quantifier sentences of FOP_ℤ expressible using at most 3 linear inequalities. Specifically, a faster-than-n^{⌈k/2⌉ ± o(1)} algorithm for k-SUM (or faster-than-n^{2 ± o(1)} algorithm for 3-SUM, respectively) directly translate to polynomial speedups of a general algorithm for all sentences in the respective fragment. Observing a barrier for proving completeness of 3-SUM for the entire class FOP_ℤ, we turn to the question which other - seemingly more general - problems are complete for FOP_ℤ. In this direction, we establish FOP_ℤ-completeness of the problem pair of Pareto Sum Verification and Hausdorff Distance under n Translations under the L_∞/L₁ norm in ℤ^d. In particular, our results invite to investigate Pareto Sum Verification as a high-dimensional generalization of 3-SUM.
Cite as

Geri Gokaj and Marvin Künnemann. Completeness Theorems for k-SUM and Geometric Friends: Deciding Fragments of Linear Integer Arithmetic. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 55:1-55:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gokaj_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.55,
  author =	{Gokaj, Geri and K\"{u}nnemann, Marvin},
  title =	{{Completeness Theorems for k-SUM and Geometric Friends: Deciding Fragments of Linear Integer Arithmetic}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{55:1--55:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.55},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226835},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.55},
  annote =	{Keywords: fine-grained complexity theory, descriptive complexity, presburger arithmetic, completeness results, k-SUM}
}
Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact