Search Results

Documents authored by Gopalakrishnan, Sathish


Document
Risk-Aware Scheduling of Dual Criticality Job Systems Using Demand Distributions

Authors: Bader Naim Alahmad and Sathish Gopalakrishnan

Published in: LITES, Volume 5, Issue 1 (2018). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 5, Issue 1


Abstract
We pose the problem of scheduling Mixed Criticality (MC) job systems when there are only two criticality levels, Lo and Hi -referred to as Dual Criticality job systems- on a single processing platform, when job demands are probabilistic and their distributions are known. The current MC models require that the scheduling policy allocate as little execution time as possible to Lo-criticality jobs if the scenario of execution is of Hi criticality, and drop Lo-criticality jobs entirely as soon as the execution scenario's criticality level can be inferred and is Hi. The work incurred by "incorrectly" scheduling Lo-criticality jobs in cases of Hi realized scenarios might affect the feasibility of Hi criticality jobs; we quantify this work and call it Work Threatening Feasibility (WTF). Our objective is to construct online scheduling policies that minimize the expected WTF for the given instance, and under which the instance is feasible in a probabilistic sense that is consistent with the traditional deterministic definition of MC feasibility. We develop a probabilistic framework for MC scheduling, where feasibility is defined in terms of (chance) constraints on the probabilities that Lo and Hi jobs meet their deadlines. The probabilities are computed over the set of sample paths, or trajectories, induced by executing the policy, and those paths are dependent upon the set of execution scenarios and the given demand distributions. Our goal is to exploit the information provided by job distributions to compute the minimum expected WTF below which the given instance is not feasible in probability, and to compute a (randomized) "efficiently implementable" scheduling policy that realizes the latter quantity. We model the problem as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) over a suitable state space and a finite planning horizon, and show that an optimal (non-stationary) Markov randomized scheduling policy exists. We derive an optimal policy by solving a Linear Program (LP). We also carry out quantitative evaluations on select probabilistic MC instances to demonstrate that our approach potentially outperforms current MC scheduling policies.

Cite as

Bader Naim Alahmad and Sathish Gopalakrishnan. Risk-Aware Scheduling of Dual Criticality Job Systems Using Demand Distributions. In LITES, Volume 5, Issue 1 (2018). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp. 01:1-01:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{alahmad_et_al:LITES-v005-i001-a001,
  author =	{Alahmad, Bader Naim and Gopalakrishnan, Sathish},
  title =	{{Risk-Aware Scheduling of Dual Criticality Job Systems Using Demand Distributions}},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  pages =	{01:1--01:30},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{5},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES-v005-i001-a001},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES-v005-i001-a001},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mixed criticalities, Probability distribution, Real time systems, Scheduling, Chance constrained Markov decision process, Linear programming, Randomized policy}
}
Document
10071 Open Problems – Scheduling

Authors: Jim Anderson, Björn Andersson, Yossi Azar, Nikhil Bansal, Enrico Bini, Marek Chrobak, José Correa, Liliana Cucu-Grosjean, Rob Davis, Arvind Easwaran, Jeff Edmonds, Shelby Funk, Sathish Gopalakrishnan, Han Hoogeveen, Claire Mathieu, Nicole Megow, Seffi Naor, Kirk Pruhs, Maurice Queyranne, Adi Rosén, Nicolas Schabanel, Jiří Sgall, René Sitters, Sebastian Stiller, Marc Uetz, Tjark Vredeveld, and Gerhard J. Woeginger

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10071, Scheduling (2010)


Abstract
Collection of the open problems presented at the scheduling seminar.

Cite as

Jim Anderson, Björn Andersson, Yossi Azar, Nikhil Bansal, Enrico Bini, Marek Chrobak, José Correa, Liliana Cucu-Grosjean, Rob Davis, Arvind Easwaran, Jeff Edmonds, Shelby Funk, Sathish Gopalakrishnan, Han Hoogeveen, Claire Mathieu, Nicole Megow, Seffi Naor, Kirk Pruhs, Maurice Queyranne, Adi Rosén, Nicolas Schabanel, Jiří Sgall, René Sitters, Sebastian Stiller, Marc Uetz, Tjark Vredeveld, and Gerhard J. Woeginger. 10071 Open Problems – Scheduling. In Scheduling. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10071, pp. 1-24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{anderson_et_al:DagSemProc.10071.3,
  author =	{Anderson, Jim and Andersson, Bj\"{o}rn and Azar, Yossi and Bansal, Nikhil and Bini, Enrico and Chrobak, Marek and Correa, Jos\'{e} and Cucu-Grosjean, Liliana and Davis, Rob and Easwaran, Arvind and Edmonds, Jeff and Funk, Shelby and Gopalakrishnan, Sathish and Hoogeveen, Han and Mathieu, Claire and Megow, Nicole and Naor, Seffi and Pruhs, Kirk and Queyranne, Maurice and Ros\'{e}n, Adi and Schabanel, Nicolas and Sgall, Ji\v{r}{\'\i} and Sitters, Ren\'{e} and Stiller, Sebastian and Uetz, Marc and Vredeveld, Tjark and Woeginger, Gerhard J.},
  title =	{{10071 Open Problems – Scheduling}},
  booktitle =	{Scheduling},
  pages =	{1--24},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2010},
  volume =	{10071},
  editor =	{Susanne Albers and Sanjoy K. Baruah and Rolf H. M\"{o}hring and Kirk Pruhs},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.10071.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-25367},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.10071.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Open problems, scheduling}
}
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail