Search Results

Documents authored by Hu, Bingbing

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.78
Hardness of Dynamic Tree Edit Distance and Friends

Authors: Bingbing Hu, Jakob Nogler, and Barna Saha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
String Edit Distance is a more-than-classical problem whose behavior in the dynamic setting, where the strings are updated over time, is well studied. A single-character substitution, insertion, or deletion can be processed in time 𝒪̃(n w) when operation costs are positive integers bounded by w [Charalampopoulos, Kociumaka, Mozes, CPM 2020][Gorbachev, Kociumaka, STOC 2025]. If the weights are further uniform (insertions and deletions have equal cost), also an 𝒪̃(n √n)-update time algorithm exists [Charalampopoulos, Kociumaka, Mozes, CPM 2020]. This is a substantial improvement over the static 𝒪(n²) algorithm when w ≪ n or when we are dealing with uniform weights. In contrast, for inherently related problems such as Tree Edit Distance, Dyck Edit Distance, and RNA Folding, it has remained unknown whether it is possible to devise dynamic algorithms with an advantage over the static algorithm. In this paper, we resolve this question by showing that (weighted) Tree Edit Distance, Dyck Edit Distance, and RNA Folding admit no dynamic speedup: under well-known fine-grained assumptions, we show that the best possible algorithm recomputes the solution from scratch after each update. Furthermore, we prove a quadratic per-update lower bound for unweighted Tree Edit Distance under the k-Clique Conjecture. This provides the first separation between dynamic unweighted String Edit Distance and unweighted Tree Edit Distance, problems whose relative difficulty in the static setting is still open.
Cite as

Bingbing Hu, Jakob Nogler, and Barna Saha. Hardness of Dynamic Tree Edit Distance and Friends. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 78:1-78:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hu_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.78,
  author =	{Hu, Bingbing and Nogler, Jakob and Saha, Barna},
  title =	{{Hardness of Dynamic Tree Edit Distance and Friends}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{78:1--78:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.78},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253653},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.78},
  annote =	{Keywords: fine-grained complexity, dynamic lower bounds, pattern matching}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.54
Non-Boolean OMv: One More Reason to Believe Lower Bounds for Dynamic Problems

Authors: Bingbing Hu and Adam Polak

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
Most of the known tight lower bounds for dynamic problems are based on the Online Boolean Matrix-Vector Multiplication (OMv) Hypothesis, which is not as well studied and understood as some more popular hypotheses in fine-grained complexity. It would be desirable to base hardness of dynamic problems on a more believable hypothesis. We propose analogues of the OMv Hypothesis for variants of matrix multiplication that are known to be harder than Boolean product in the offline setting, namely: equality, dominance, min-witness, min-max, and bounded monotone min-plus products. These hypotheses are a priori weaker assumptions than the standard (Boolean) OMv Hypothesis and yet we show that they are actually equivalent to it. This establishes the first such fine-grained equivalence class for dynamic problems.
Cite as

Bingbing Hu and Adam Polak. Non-Boolean OMv: One More Reason to Believe Lower Bounds for Dynamic Problems. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 54:1-54:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hu_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.54,
  author =	{Hu, Bingbing and Polak, Adam},
  title =	{{Non-Boolean OMv: One More Reason to Believe Lower Bounds for Dynamic Problems}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{54:1--54:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.54},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245228},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.54},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fine-grained complexity, OMv hypothesis, reductions, equivalence class}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2024.72
Connectivity Oracles for Predictable Vertex Failures

Authors: Bingbing Hu, Evangelos Kosinas, and Adam Polak

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 308, 32nd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2024)

Abstract
The problem of designing connectivity oracles supporting vertex failures is one of the basic data structures problems for undirected graphs. It is already well understood: previous works [Duan-Pettie STOC'10; Long-Saranurak FOCS'22] achieve query time linear in the number of failed vertices, and it is conditionally optimal as long as we require preprocessing time polynomial in the size of the graph and update time polynomial in the number of failed vertices. We revisit this problem in the paradigm of algorithms with predictions: we ask if the query time can be improved if the set of failed vertices can be predicted beforehand up to a small number of errors. More specifically, we design a data structure that, given a graph G = (V,E) and a set of vertices predicted to fail D̂ ⊆ V of size d = |D̂|, preprocesses it in time Õ(d|E|) and then can receive an update given as the symmetric difference between the predicted and the actual set of failed vertices D̂△D = (D̂ ⧵ D) ∪ (D ⧵ D̂) of size η = |D̂△D|, process it in time Õ(η⁴), and after that answer connectivity queries in G ⧵ D in time O(η). Viewed from another perspective, our data structure provides an improvement over the state of the art for the fully dynamic subgraph connectivity problem in the sensitivity setting [Henzinger-Neumann ESA'16]. We argue that the preprocessing time and query time of our data structure are conditionally optimal under standard fine-grained complexity assumptions.
Cite as

Bingbing Hu, Evangelos Kosinas, and Adam Polak. Connectivity Oracles for Predictable Vertex Failures. In 32nd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 308, pp. 72:1-72:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hu_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2024.72,
  author =	{Hu, Bingbing and Kosinas, Evangelos and Polak, Adam},
  title =	{{Connectivity Oracles for Predictable Vertex Failures}},
  booktitle =	{32nd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2024)},
  pages =	{72:1--72:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-338-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{308},
  editor =	{Chan, Timothy and Fischer, Johannes and Iacono, John and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2024.72},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-211437},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2024.72},
  annote =	{Keywords: Data structures, graph connectivity, algorithms with predictions}
}
Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact