DROPS

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.16

The Isabelle ENIGMA

Authors: Zarathustra A. Goertzel, Jan Jakubův, Cezary Kaliszyk, Miroslav Olšák, Jelle Piepenbrock, and Josef Urban

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 237, 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)

Abstract

We significantly improve the performance of the E automated theorem prover on the Isabelle Sledgehammer problems by combining learning and theorem proving in several ways. In particular, we develop targeted versions of the ENIGMA guidance for the Isabelle problems, targeted versions of neural premise selection, and targeted strategies for E. The methods are trained in several iterations over hundreds of thousands untyped and typed first-order problems extracted from Isabelle. Our final best single-strategy ENIGMA and premise selection system improves the best previous version of E by 25.3% in 15 seconds, outperforming also all other previous ATP and SMT systems.

Cite as

Zarathustra A. Goertzel, Jan Jakubův, Cezary Kaliszyk, Miroslav Olšák, Jelle Piepenbrock, and Josef Urban. The Isabelle ENIGMA. In 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 237, pp. 16:1-16:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{goertzel_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2022.16,
  author =	{Goertzel, Zarathustra A. and Jakub\r{u}v, Jan and Kaliszyk, Cezary and Ol\v{s}\'{a}k, Miroslav and Piepenbrock, Jelle and Urban, Josef},
  title =	{{The Isabelle ENIGMA}},
  booktitle =	{13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-252-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{237},
  editor =	{Andronick, June and de Moura, Leonardo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-167253},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: E Prover, ENIGMA, Premise Selection, Isabelle/Sledgehammer}
}

Document

Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.57

Dichotomy for Symmetric Boolean PCSPs

Authors: Miron Ficak, Marcin Kozik, Miroslav Olšák, and Szymon Stankiewicz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 132, 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)

Abstract

In one of the most actively studied version of Constraint Satisfaction Problem, a CSP is defined by a relational structure called a template. In the decision version of the problem the goal is to determine whether a structure given on input admits a homomorphism into this template. Two recent independent results of Bulatov [FOCS'17] and Zhuk [FOCS'17] state that each finite template defines CSP which is tractable or NP-complete. In a recent paper Brakensiek and Guruswami [SODA'18] proposed an extension of the CSP framework. This extension, called Promise Constraint Satisfaction Problem, includes many naturally occurring computational questions, e.g. approximate coloring, that cannot be cast as CSPs. A PCSP is a combination of two CSPs defined by two similar templates; the computational question is to distinguish a YES instance of the first one from a NO instance of the second. The computational complexity of many PCSPs remains unknown. Even the case of Boolean templates (solved for CSP by Schaefer [STOC'78]) remains wide open. The main result of Brakensiek and Guruswami [SODA'18] shows that Boolean PCSPs exhibit a dichotomy (PTIME vs. NPC) when "all the clauses are symmetric and allow for negation of variables". In this paper we remove the "allow for negation of variables" assumption from the theorem. The "symmetric" assumption means that changing the order of variables in a constraint does not change its satisfiability. The "negation of variables" means that both of the templates share a relation which can be used to effectively negate Boolean variables. The main result of this paper establishes dichotomy for all the symmetric boolean templates. The tractability case of our theorem and the theorem of Brakensiek and Guruswami are almost identical. The main difference, and the main contribution of this work, is the new reason for hardness and the reasoning proving the split.

Cite as

Miron Ficak, Marcin Kozik, Miroslav Olšák, and Szymon Stankiewicz. Dichotomy for Symmetric Boolean PCSPs. In 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 132, pp. 57:1-57:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ficak_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.57,
  author =	{Ficak, Miron and Kozik, Marcin and Ol\v{s}\'{a}k, Miroslav and Stankiewicz, Szymon},
  title =	{{Dichotomy for Symmetric Boolean PCSPs}},
  booktitle =	{46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)},
  pages =	{57:1--57:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-109-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{132},
  editor =	{Baier, Christel and Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Flocchini, Paola and Leonardi, Stefano},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.57},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-106339},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.57},
  annote =	{Keywords: promise constraint satisfaction problem, PCSP, algebraic approach}
}

Search Results

Documents authored by Olšák, Miroslav

The Isabelle ENIGMA

Abstract

Cite as

Dichotomy for Symmetric Boolean PCSPs

Abstract

Cite as

Thanks for your feedback!

Could not send message