Search Results

Documents authored by Otten, Daniël


Document
Constructing (Co)inductive Types via Large Sizes

Authors: Bastiaan Laarakker, Daniël Otten, and Benno van den Berg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 378, 11th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2026)


Abstract
To ensure decidability and consistency of its type theory, a proof assistant should only accept terminating recursive functions and productive corecursive functions. Most proof assistants enforce this through syntactic conditions, which can be restrictive and non-modular. Sized types are a type-based alternative where (co)inductive types are annotated with additional size information. Well-founded induction on sizes can then be used to prove termination and productivity. An implementation of sized types exists in Agda, but it is currently inconsistent due to the addition of a largest size. We investigate an alternative approach, where intensional type theory is extended with a large type of sizes and parametric quantifiers over sizes. We show that inductive and coinductive types can be constructed in this theory, which improves on earlier work where this was only possible for the finitely-branching inductive types. The consistency of the theory is justified by an impredicative realisability model, which interprets the type of sizes as an uncountable ordinal.

Cite as

Bastiaan Laarakker, Daniël Otten, and Benno van den Berg. Constructing (Co)inductive Types via Large Sizes. In 11th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 378, pp. 21:1-21:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{laarakker_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2026.21,
  author =	{Laarakker, Bastiaan and Otten, Dani\"{e}l and van den Berg, Benno},
  title =	{{Constructing (Co)inductive Types via Large Sizes}},
  booktitle =	{11th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2026)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-433-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{378},
  editor =	{Pfenning, Frank},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2026.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-263714},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2026.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Sized Types, Parametricity, Realisability, Impredicativity, Constructive Ordinals, (Co)inductive Types}
}
Document
The Biequivalence of Path Categories and Axiomatic Martin-Löf Type Theories

Authors: Daniël Otten and Matteo Spadetto

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)


Abstract
The semantics of extensional type theory has an elegant categorical description: models of extensional =-types, 𝟙-types, and Σ-types are biequivalent to finitely complete categories, while adding Π-types yields locally Cartesian closed categories. We establish parallel results for axiomatic type theory, which includes systems like cubical type theory, where the computation rule of the =-types only holds as a propositional axiom instead of a definitional reduction. In particular, we prove that models of axiomatic =-types, and standard 𝟙- and Σ-types are biequivalent to certain path categories, while adding axiomatic Π-types yields dependent homotopy exponents. This biequivalence simplifies axiomatic =-types, which are more intricate than extensional ones since they permit higher dimensional structure. Specifically, path categories use a primitive notion of equivalence instead of a direct reproduction of the syntactic elimination rules and computation axioms. We apply our correspondence to prove a coherence theorem: we show that these weak homotopical models can be turned into equivalent strict models of axiomatic type theory. In addition, we introduce a more modular notion, that of a display map path category, which only models axiomatic =-types by default, while leaving room to add other axiomatic type formers such as 𝟙-, Σ-, and Π-types.

Cite as

Daniël Otten and Matteo Spadetto. The Biequivalence of Path Categories and Axiomatic Martin-Löf Type Theories. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 38:1-38:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{otten_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.38,
  author =	{Otten, Dani\"{e}l and Spadetto, Matteo},
  title =	{{The Biequivalence of Path Categories and Axiomatic Martin-L\"{o}f Type Theories}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{38:1--38:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.38},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254633},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.38},
  annote =	{Keywords: Axiomatic type theory, cubical type theory, propositional equality, biequivalence, display map categories, path categories, homotopy theory, coherence}
}
Document
Conservativity of Type Theory over Higher-Order Arithmetic

Authors: Daniël Otten and Benno van den Berg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)


Abstract
We investigate how much type theory can prove about the natural numbers. A classical result in this area shows that dependent type theory without any universes is conservative over Heyting Arithmetic (HA). We build on this result by showing that type theories with one level of impredicative universes are conservative over Higher-order Heyting Arithmetic (HAH). This result clearly depends on the specific type theory in question, however, we show that the interpretation of logic also plays a major role. For proof-irrelevant interpretations, we will see that strong versions of type theory prove exactly the same higher-order arithmetical formulas as HAH. Conversely, for proof-relevant interpretations, they prove different second-order arithmetical formulas than HAH, while still proving exactly the same first-order arithmetical formulas. Along the way, we investigate the various interpretations of logic in type theory, and to what extent dependent type theories can be seen as extensions of higher-order logic. We apply our results by proving a De Jongh’s theorem for type theory.

Cite as

Daniël Otten and Benno van den Berg. Conservativity of Type Theory over Higher-Order Arithmetic. In 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, pp. 44:1-44:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{otten_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2024.44,
  author =	{Otten, Dani\"{e}l and van den Berg, Benno},
  title =	{{Conservativity of Type Theory over Higher-Order Arithmetic}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{44:1--44:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.44},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196873},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.44},
  annote =	{Keywords: Conservativity, Arithmetic, Realizability, Calculus of Inductive Constructions}
}
Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail