Search Results

Documents authored by Stewart, Neil F.


Found 2 Possible Name Variants:

Stewart, Neil F.

Document
Integrating Topology and Geometry for Macro-Molecular Simulations

Authors: Edward L. F. Moore, Thomas J. Peters, David R. Ferguson, and Neil F. Stewart

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4351, Spatial Representation: Discrete vs. Continuous Computational Models (2005)


Abstract
Emerging macro-molecular simulations, such as supercoiling of DNA and protein unfolding, have an opportunity to profit from two decades of experience with geometric models within computer-aided geometric design (CAGD). For CAGD, static models are often sufficient, while form and function are inextricably related in biochemistry, resulting in greater attention to critical topological characteristics of these dynamic models. The greater emphasis upon dynamic change in macro-molecular simulations imposes increased demands for faithful integration of topology and geometry, as well as much stricter requirements for computational efficiency. This article presents transitions from the CAGD domain to meet the greater fidelity and performance demands for macro-molecular simulations.

Cite as

Edward L. F. Moore, Thomas J. Peters, David R. Ferguson, and Neil F. Stewart. Integrating Topology and Geometry for Macro-Molecular Simulations. In Spatial Representation: Discrete vs. Continuous Computational Models. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4351, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{moore_et_al:DagSemProc.04351.16,
  author =	{Moore, Edward L. F. and Peters, Thomas J. and Ferguson, David R. and Stewart, Neil F.},
  title =	{{Integrating Topology and Geometry for Macro-Molecular Simulations}},
  booktitle =	{Spatial Representation: Discrete vs. Continuous Computational Models},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{4351},
  editor =	{Ralph Kopperman and Michael B. Smyth and Dieter Spreen and Julian Webster},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.04351.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-1240},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.04351.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Computational topology , spline , approximation}
}

Stewart, Neil

Document
Robustness of Boolean operations on subdivision-surface models

Authors: Di Jiang and Neil Stewart

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8021, Numerical Validation in Current Hardware Architectures (2008)


Abstract
This work was presented in two parts at Dagstuhl seminar 08021. The two presentations described work in progress, including a ``backward bound'' for a combined backward/forward error analysis for the problem mentioned in the title. We seek rigorous proofs that representations of computed sets, produced by algorithms to compute Boolean operations, are well formed, and that the algorithms are correct. Such proofs should eventually take account of the use of finite-precision arithmetic, although the proofs presented here do not. The representations studied are based on subdivision surfaces. Such representations are being used more and more frequently in place of trimmed NURBS representations, and the robustness analysis for these new representations is simpler than for trimmed NURBS. The particular subdivision-surface representation used is based on the Loop subdivision scheme. The analysis is broken into three parts. First, it is established that the input operands are well-formed two-dimensional manifolds without boundary. This can be done with existing methods. Secondly, we introduce the so-called ``limit mesh'', and view the limit meshes corresponding to the input sets as defining an approximate problem in the sense of a backward error analysis. The presentations mentioned above described a proof of the corresponding error bound. The third part of the analysis corresponds to the ``forward bound'': this remains to be done.

Cite as

Di Jiang and Neil Stewart. Robustness of Boolean operations on subdivision-surface models. In Numerical Validation in Current Hardware Architectures. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8021, pp. 1-10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jiang_et_al:DagSemProc.08021.17,
  author =	{Jiang, Di and Stewart, Neil},
  title =	{{Robustness of Boolean operations on subdivision-surface models}},
  booktitle =	{Numerical Validation in Current Hardware Architectures},
  pages =	{1--10},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{8021},
  editor =	{Annie Cuyt and Walter Kr\"{a}mer and Wolfram Luther and Peter Markstein},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08021.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-14435},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08021.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Robustness, finite-precision arithmetic, Boolean operations, subdivision surfaces}
}
Document
Transfinite interpolation for well-definition in error analysis in solid modelling

Authors: Neil Stewart and Malika Zidani

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6021, Reliable Implementation of Real Number Algorithms: Theory and Practice (2006)


Abstract
An overall approach to the problem of error analysis in the context of solid modelling, analogous to the standard forward/backward error analysis of Numerical Analysis, was described in a recent paper by Hoffmann and Stewart. An important subproblem within this overall approach is the well-definition of the sets specified by inconsistent data. These inconsistencies may come from the use of finite-precision real-number arithmetic, from the use of low-degree curves to approximate boundaries, or from terminating an infinite convergent (subdivision) process after only a finite number of steps. An earlier paper, by Andersson and the present authors, showed how to resolve this problem of well-definition, in the context of standard trimmed-NURBS representations, by using the Whitney Extension Theorem. In this paper we will show how an analogous approach can be used in the context of trimmed surfaces based on combined-subdivision representations, such as those proposed by Litke, Levin and Schröder. A further component of the problem of well-definition is ensuring that adjacent patches in a representation do not have extraneous intersections. (Here, "extraneous intersections" refers to intersections, between two patches forming part of the boundary, other than prescribed intersections along a common edge or at a common vertex.) The paper also describes the derivation of a bound for normal vectors that can be used for this purpose. This bound is relevant both in the case of trimmed-NURBS representations, and in the case of combined subdivision with trimming.

Cite as

Neil Stewart and Malika Zidani. Transfinite interpolation for well-definition in error analysis in solid modelling. In Reliable Implementation of Real Number Algorithms: Theory and Practice. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6021, pp. 1-12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2006)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{stewart_et_al:DagSemProc.06021.9,
  author =	{Stewart, Neil and Zidani, Malika},
  title =	{{Transfinite interpolation for well-definition in error analysis in solid modelling}},
  booktitle =	{Reliable Implementation of Real Number Algorithms: Theory and Practice},
  pages =	{1--12},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2006},
  volume =	{6021},
  editor =	{Peter Hertling and Christoph M. Hoffmann and Wolfram Luther and Nathalie Revol},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.06021.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-7195},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.06021.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Forward/backward error analysis, robustness, well-definition, trimmed NURBS, combined subdivision, trimming, bounds on normals}
}
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail