2 Search Results for "Lopes, António L."

Document
Survey
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.1.1.11
How Does Knowledge Evolve in Open Knowledge Graphs?

Authors: Axel Polleres, Romana Pernisch, Angela Bonifati, Daniele Dell'Aglio, Daniil Dobriy, Stefania Dumbrava, Lorena Etcheverry, Nicolas Ferranti, Katja Hose, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, Matteo Lissandrini, Ansgar Scherp, Riccardo Tommasini, and Johannes Wachs

Published in: TGDK, Volume 1, Issue 1 (2023): Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 1, Issue 1

Abstract
Openly available, collaboratively edited Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are key platforms for the collective management of evolving knowledge. The present work aims t o provide an analysis of the obstacles related to investigating and processing specifically this central aspect of evolution in KGs. To this end, we discuss (i) the dimensions of evolution in KGs, (ii) the observability of evolution in existing, open, collaboratively constructed Knowledge Graphs over time, and (iii) possible metrics to analyse this evolution. We provide an overview of relevant state-of-the-art research, ranging from metrics developed for Knowledge Graphs specifically to potential methods from related fields such as network science. Additionally, we discuss technical approaches - and their current limitations - related to storing, analysing and processing large and evolving KGs in terms of handling typical KG downstream tasks.
Cite as

Axel Polleres, Romana Pernisch, Angela Bonifati, Daniele Dell'Aglio, Daniil Dobriy, Stefania Dumbrava, Lorena Etcheverry, Nicolas Ferranti, Katja Hose, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, Matteo Lissandrini, Ansgar Scherp, Riccardo Tommasini, and Johannes Wachs. How Does Knowledge Evolve in Open Knowledge Graphs?. In Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 11:1-11:59, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{polleres_et_al:TGDK.1.1.11,
  author =	{Polleres, Axel and Pernisch, Romana and Bonifati, Angela and Dell'Aglio, Daniele and Dobriy, Daniil and Dumbrava, Stefania and Etcheverry, Lorena and Ferranti, Nicolas and Hose, Katja and Jim\'{e}nez-Ruiz, Ernesto and Lissandrini, Matteo and Scherp, Ansgar and Tommasini, Riccardo and Wachs, Johannes},
  title =	{{How Does Knowledge Evolve in Open Knowledge Graphs?}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{11:1--11:59},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{1},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.1.1.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-194855},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.1.1.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: KG evolution, temporal KG, versioned KG, dynamic KG}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2023.5
Web of Science Citation Gaps: An Automatic Approach to Detect Indexed but Missing Citations

Authors: David Rodrigues, António L. Lopes, and Fernando Batista

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 113, 12th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2023)

Abstract
The number of citations a research paper receives is a crucial metric for both researchers and institutions. However, since citation databases have their own source lists, finding all the citations of a given paper can be a challenge. As a result, there may be missing citations that are not counted towards a paper’s total citation count. To address this issue, we present an automated approach to find missing citations leveraging the use of multiple indexing databases. In this research, Web of Science (WoS) serves as a case study and OpenAlex is used as a reference point for comparison. For a given paper, we identify all citing papers found in both research databases. Then, for each citing paper we check if it is indexed in WoS, but not referred in WoS as a citing paper, in order to determine if it is a missing citation. In our experiments, from a set of 1539 papers indexed by WoS, we found 696 missing citations. This outcome proves the success of our approach, and reveals that WoS does not always consider the full list of citing papers of a given publication, even when these citing papers are indexed by WoS. We also found that WoS has a higher chance of missing information for more recent publications. These findings provide relevant insights about this indexing research database, and provide enough motivation for considering other research databases in our study, such as Scopus and Google Scholar, in order to improve the matching and querying algorithms, and to reduce false positives, towards providing a more comprehensive and accurate view of the citations of a paper.
Cite as

David Rodrigues, António L. Lopes, and Fernando Batista. Web of Science Citation Gaps: An Automatic Approach to Detect Indexed but Missing Citations. In 12th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2023). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 113, pp. 5:1-5:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{rodrigues_et_al:OASIcs.SLATE.2023.5,
  author =	{Rodrigues, David and Lopes, Ant\'{o}nio L. and Batista, Fernando},
  title =	{{Web of Science Citation Gaps: An Automatic Approach to Detect Indexed but Missing Citations}},
  booktitle =	{12th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2023)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:11},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-291-4},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{113},
  editor =	{Sim\~{o}es, Alberto and Ber\'{o}n, Mario Marcelo and Portela, Filipe},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2023.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-185199},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2023.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Research Databases, Citations, Citation Databases, Web of Science, OpenAlex}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 2 Document/PDF
  • 1 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2023

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Batista, Fernando
  • 1 Bonifati, Angela
  • 1 Dell'Aglio, Daniele
  • 1 Dobriy, Daniil
  • 1 Dumbrava, Stefania
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 1 OASIcs
  • 1 TGDK

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Applied computing → Digital libraries and archives
  • 1 Applied computing → Publishing
  • 1 General and reference → Verification
  • 1 Information systems → Data cleaning
  • 1 Information systems → Data streaming
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Citation Databases
  • 1 Citations
  • 1 KG evolution
  • 1 OpenAlex
  • 1 Research Databases
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact