5 Search Results for "Lozes, Etienne"


Document
The Tail-Recursive Fragment of Timed Recursive CTL

Authors: Florian Bruse, Martin Lange, and Etienne Lozes

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 247, 29th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2022)


Abstract
Timed Recursive CTL (TRCTL) was recently proposed as a merger of two extensions of the well-known branching-time logic CTL: Timed CTL on one hand is interpreted over real-time systems like timed automata, and Recursive CTL (RecCTL) on the other hand obtains high expressiveness through the introduction of a recursion operator. Model checking for the resulting logic is known to be 2-EXPTIME-complete. The aim of this paper is to investigate the possibility to obtain a fragment of lower complexity without losing too much expressive power. It is obtained by a syntactic property called "tail-recursiveness" that restricts the way that recursive formulas can be built. This restriction is known to decrease the complexity of model checking by half an exponential in the untimed setting. We show that this also works in the real-time world: model checking for the tail-recursive fragment of TRCTL is EXPSPACE-complete. The upper bound is obtained by a standard untiming construction via region graphs, and rests on the known complexity of tail-recursive fragments of higher-order modal logics. The lower bound is established by a reduction from a suitable tiling problem.

Cite as

Florian Bruse, Martin Lange, and Etienne Lozes. The Tail-Recursive Fragment of Timed Recursive CTL. In 29th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 247, pp. 5:1-5:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bruse_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2022.5,
  author =	{Bruse, Florian and Lange, Martin and Lozes, Etienne},
  title =	{{The Tail-Recursive Fragment of Timed Recursive CTL}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2022)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-262-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{247},
  editor =	{Artikis, Alexander and Posenato, Roberto and Tonetta, Stefano},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2022.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-172527},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2022.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: formal specification, temporal logic, real-time systems}
}
Document
A Unifying Framework for Deciding Synchronizability

Authors: Benedikt Bollig, Cinzia Di Giusto, Alain Finkel, Laetitia Laversa, Etienne Lozes, and Amrita Suresh

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 203, 32nd International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2021)


Abstract
Several notions of synchronizability of a message-passing system have been introduced in the literature. Roughly, a system is called synchronizable if every execution can be rescheduled so that it meets certain criteria, e.g., a channel bound. We provide a framework, based on MSO logic and (special) tree-width, that unifies existing definitions, explains their good properties, and allows one to easily derive other, more general definitions and decidability results for synchronizability.

Cite as

Benedikt Bollig, Cinzia Di Giusto, Alain Finkel, Laetitia Laversa, Etienne Lozes, and Amrita Suresh. A Unifying Framework for Deciding Synchronizability. In 32nd International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 203, pp. 14:1-14:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bollig_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2021.14,
  author =	{Bollig, Benedikt and Di Giusto, Cinzia and Finkel, Alain and Laversa, Laetitia and Lozes, Etienne and Suresh, Amrita},
  title =	{{A Unifying Framework for Deciding Synchronizability}},
  booktitle =	{32nd International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2021)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-203-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{203},
  editor =	{Haddad, Serge and Varacca, Daniele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2021.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-143917},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2021.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: communicating finite-state machines, message sequence charts, synchronizability, MSO logic, special tree-width}
}
Document
Internal Calculi for Separation Logics

Authors: Stéphane Demri, Etienne Lozes, and Alessio Mansutti

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 152, 28th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2020)


Abstract
We present a general approach to axiomatise separation logics with heaplet semantics with no external features such as nominals/labels. To start with, we design the first (internal) Hilbert-style axiomatisation for the quantifier-free separation logic SL(∗, -*). We instantiate the method by introducing a new separation logic with essential features: it is equipped with the separating conjunction, the predicate ls, and a natural guarded form of first-order quantification. We apply our approach for its axiomatisation. As a by-product of our method, we also establish the exact expressive power of this new logic and we show PSpace-completeness of its satisfiability problem.

Cite as

Stéphane Demri, Etienne Lozes, and Alessio Mansutti. Internal Calculi for Separation Logics. In 28th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 152, pp. 19:1-19:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{demri_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2020.19,
  author =	{Demri, St\'{e}phane and Lozes, Etienne and Mansutti, Alessio},
  title =	{{Internal Calculi for Separation Logics}},
  booktitle =	{28th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2020)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-132-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{152},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel and Muscholl, Anca},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2020.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-116625},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2020.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Separation logic, internal calculus, adjunct/quantifier elimination}
}
Document
On Symbolic Heaps Modulo Permission Theories

Authors: Stéphane Demri, Etienne Lozes, and Denis Lugiez

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 93, 37th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2017)


Abstract
We address the entailment problem for separation logic with symbolic heaps admitting list pred- icates and permissions for memory cells that are essential to express ownership of a heap region. In the permission-free case, the entailment problem is known to be in P. Herein, we design new decision procedures for solving the satisfiability and entailment problems that are parameterised by the permission theories. This permits the use of solvers dealing with the permission theory at hand, independently of the shape analysis. We also show that the entailment problem without list predicates is coNP-complete for several permission models, such as counting permissions and binary tree shares but the problem is in P for fractional permissions. Furthermore, when list predicates are added, we prove that the entailment problem is coNP-complete when the entail- ment problem for permission formulae is in coNP, assuming the write permission can be split into as many read permissions as desired. Finally, we show that the entailment problem for any Boolean permission model with infinite width is coNP-complete.

Cite as

Stéphane Demri, Etienne Lozes, and Denis Lugiez. On Symbolic Heaps Modulo Permission Theories. In 37th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 93, pp. 25:1-25:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{demri_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2017.25,
  author =	{Demri, St\'{e}phane and Lozes, Etienne and Lugiez, Denis},
  title =	{{On Symbolic Heaps Modulo Permission Theories}},
  booktitle =	{37th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2017)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-055-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{93},
  editor =	{Lokam, Satya and Ramanujam, R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2017.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-83887},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2017.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: separation logic, entailment, permission, reasoning modulo theories}
}
Document
Synchronizability of Communicating Finite State Machines is not Decidable

Authors: Alain Finkel and Etienne Lozes

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 80, 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017)


Abstract
A system of communicating finite state machines is synchronizable if its send trace semantics, i.e. the set of sequences of sendings it can perform, is the same when its communications are FIFO asynchronous and when they are just rendez-vous synchronizations. This property was claimed to be decidable in several conference and journal papers for either mailboxes or peer-to-peer communications, thanks to a form of small model property. In this paper, we show that this small model property does not hold neither for mailbox communications, nor for peer-to-peer communications, therefore the decidability of synchronizability becomes an open question. We close this question for peer-to-peer communications, and we show that synchronizability is actually undecidable. We show that synchronizability is decidable if the topology of communications is an oriented ring. We also show that, in this case, synchronizability implies the absence of unspecified receptions and orphan messages, and the channel-recognizability of the reachability set.

Cite as

Alain Finkel and Etienne Lozes. Synchronizability of Communicating Finite State Machines is not Decidable. In 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 80, pp. 122:1-122:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{finkel_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.122,
  author =	{Finkel, Alain and Lozes, Etienne},
  title =	{{Synchronizability of Communicating Finite State Machines is not Decidable}},
  booktitle =	{44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017)},
  pages =	{122:1--122:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-041-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{80},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Indyk, Piotr and Kuhn, Fabian and Muscholl, Anca},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.122},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-74020},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.122},
  annote =	{Keywords: verification, distributed system, asynchronous communications, choreographies}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 5 Lozes, Etienne
  • 2 Demri, Stéphane
  • 2 Finkel, Alain
  • 1 Bollig, Benedikt
  • 1 Bruse, Florian
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Theory of computation
  • 1 Theory of computation → Formal languages and automata theory
  • 1 Theory of computation → Modal and temporal logics
  • 1 Theory of computation → Program specifications

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 MSO logic
  • 1 Separation logic
  • 1 adjunct/quantifier elimination
  • 1 asynchronous communications
  • 1 choreographies
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 5 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2017
  • 1 2018
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2021
  • 1 2022

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail