6 Search Results for "Statman, Richard"

Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.3
Unsolvable Terms in Filter Models (Invited Talk)

Authors: Mariangiola Dezani-Ciancaglini, Paola Giannini, and Furio Honsell

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
Intersection type theories (itt’s) and filter models, i.e. λ-calculus models generated by itt’s, are reviewed in full generality. In this framework, which subsumes most λ-calculus models in the literature based on Scott-continuous functions, we discuss the interpretation of unsolvable terms. We give a necessary, but not sufficient, condition on an itt for the interpretation of some unsolvable term to be non-trivial in the filter model it generates. This result is obtained building on a type theoretic characterisation of the fine structure of unsolvables.
Cite as

Mariangiola Dezani-Ciancaglini, Paola Giannini, and Furio Honsell. Unsolvable Terms in Filter Models (Invited Talk). In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 3:1-3:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dezaniciancaglini_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.3,
  author =	{Dezani-Ciancaglini, Mariangiola and Giannini, Paola and Honsell, Furio},
  title =	{{Unsolvable Terms in Filter Models}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236181},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: \lambda-calculus, Intersection Types, Unsolvable Terms, Filter Models}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.17
Mechanized Undecidability of Higher-Order Beta-Matching

Authors: Andrej Dudenhefner

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
Higher-order β-matching is the following decision problem: given two simply typed λ-terms, can the first term be instantiated to be β-equivalent to the second term? This problem was formulated by Huet in the 1970s and shown undecidable by Loader in 2003 by reduction from λ-definability. The present work provides a novel undecidability proof for higher-order β-matching, in an effort to verify this result by means of a proof assistant. Rather than starting from λ-definability, the presented proof encodes a restricted form of string rewriting as higher-order β-matching. The particular approach is similar to Urzyczyn’s undecidability result for intersection type inhabitation. The presented approach has several advantages. First, the proof is simpler to verify in full detail due to the simple form of rewriting systems, which serve as a starting point. Second, undecidability of the considered problem in string rewriting is already certified using the Coq proof assistant. As a consequence, we obtain a certified many-one reduction from the Halting Problem to higher-order β-matching. Third, the presented approach identifies a uniform construction which shows undecidability of higher-order β-matching, λ-definability, and intersection type inhabitation. The presented undecidability proof is mechanized in the Coq proof assistant and contributed to the existing Coq Library of Undecidability Proofs.
Cite as

Andrej Dudenhefner. Mechanized Undecidability of Higher-Order Beta-Matching. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 17:1-17:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dudenhefner:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.17,
  author =	{Dudenhefner, Andrej},
  title =	{{Mechanized Undecidability of Higher-Order Beta-Matching}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236323},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda-calculus, simple types, undecidability, higher-order matching, mechanization, Coq}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18
Knowledge Problems vs Unification and Matching: Dichotomy Results

Authors: Serdar Erbatur, Andrew M. Marshall, Paliath Narendran, and Christophe Ringeissen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
The research area of cryptographic protocol analysis contains a number of innovative algorithms and procedures for checking various security properties of protocols. Most of these procedures focus on solving one of several "knowledge problems" that model intruder knowledge. Solving these problems can demonstrate the ability of the intruder to obtain some forbidden information of the protocol, such as secret keys. Two important examples of these problems are the deduction problem and the static equivalence problem. Deduction is concerned with the ability to derive a term from a set of terms (or knowledge) obtained from the observation of a protocol instance. Static equivalence, on the other hand, is concerned with distinguishing between two runs of a protocol based on two sets of knowledge. These two knowledge problems at first inspection appear to be very close to the older automated reasoning problems of matching and unification. However, this first impression is wrong, and there have been a few results that have shown theories where one problem, such as unification, is undecidable but another problem, such as deduction, is decidable. These existing dichotomy results were, however, incomplete, and not all cases had been examined, thus leaving the possibility of some connection between the problems for those unexamined cases. In this paper, we consider the missing dichotomy cases. For each of the remaining cases, we demonstrate a theory that separates the two problems. In addition, once the dichotomy results are completed, it leaves open the question of the existence of non-trivial classes of theories for which all four of the problems are decidable. One example for which this is true is the well-known class of subterm convergent term rewrite systems. In this paper, we develop another example, a class of restrictive permutative theories for which all problems are likewise decidable.
Cite as

Serdar Erbatur, Andrew M. Marshall, Paliath Narendran, and Christophe Ringeissen. Knowledge Problems vs Unification and Matching: Dichotomy Results. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 18:1-18:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{erbatur_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18,
  author =	{Erbatur, Serdar and Marshall, Andrew M. and Narendran, Paliath and Ringeissen, Christophe},
  title =	{{Knowledge Problems vs Unification and Matching: Dichotomy Results}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236331},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge Problems, Unification, Matching, Decidability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4
Separating Terms by Means of Multi Types, Coinductively

Authors: Adrienne Lancelot

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 336, 30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024)

Abstract
Intersection type systems, as adequate models of the λ-calculus, induce an equational theory on terms, that we refer to as type equivalence. We give a new proof technique to coinductively characterize type equivalence. To do so, we explore a simple setting, namely weak head type equivalence, which is the equational theory induced by a weak head non-idempotent intersection type system. We prove a folklore result: weak head type equivalence coincides with Sangiorgi’s normal form bisimilarity. What is new in our development is that we only rely on coinductive program equivalences, bypassing the need to introduce term approximants, which were used in previous works characterizing type equivalence. The crucial part of this characterization is to show that type equivalent terms are normal form bisimilar: we do so by constructing shape typings that can only type terms of a specific normal form structure. Shape typings are a light form of principal types, a technique often used in intersection types to generate from one or few principal typing all possible typings of a term.
Cite as

Adrienne Lancelot. Separating Terms by Means of Multi Types, Coinductively. In 30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 336, pp. 4:1-4:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lancelot:LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4,
  author =	{Lancelot, Adrienne},
  title =	{{Separating Terms by Means of Multi Types, Coinductively}},
  booktitle =	{30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-376-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{336},
  editor =	{M{\o}gelberg, Rasmus Ejlers and van den Berg, Benno},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233660},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda calculus, intersection types, program equivalence}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2022.33
Higher-Order Quantified Boolean Satisfiability

Authors: Dmitry Chistikov, Christoph Haase, Zahra Hadizadeh, and Alessio Mansutti

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 241, 47th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2022)

Abstract
The Boolean satisfiability problem plays a central role in computational complexity and is often used as a starting point for showing NP lower bounds. Generalisations such as Succinct SAT, where a Boolean formula is succinctly represented as a Boolean circuit, have been studied in the literature in order to lift the Boolean satisfiability problem to higher complexity classes such as NEXP. While, in theory, iterating this approach yields complete problems for k-NEXP for all k > 0, using such iterations of Succinct SAT is at best tedious when it comes to proving lower bounds. The main contribution of this paper is to show that the Boolean satisfiability problem has another canonical generalisation in terms of higher-order Boolean functions that is arguably more suitable for showing lower bounds beyond NP. We introduce a family of problems HOSAT(k,d), k ≥ 0, d ≥ 1, in which variables are interpreted as Boolean functions of order at most k and there are d quantifier alternations between functions of order exactly k. We show that the unbounded HOSAT problem is TOWER-complete, and that HOSAT(k,d) is complete for the weak k-EXP hierarchy with d alternations for fixed k,d ≥ 1 and d odd. We illustrate the usefulness of HOSAT by characterising the complexity of weak Presburger arithmetic, the first-order theory of the integers with addition and equality but without order. It has been a long-standing open problem whether weak Presburger arithmetic has the same complexity as standard Presburger arithmetic. We answer this question affirmatively, even for the negation-free fragment and the Horn fragment of weak Presburger arithmetic.
Cite as

Dmitry Chistikov, Christoph Haase, Zahra Hadizadeh, and Alessio Mansutti. Higher-Order Quantified Boolean Satisfiability. In 47th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 241, pp. 33:1-33:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chistikov_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2022.33,
  author =	{Chistikov, Dmitry and Haase, Christoph and Hadizadeh, Zahra and Mansutti, Alessio},
  title =	{{Higher-Order Quantified Boolean Satisfiability}},
  booktitle =	{47th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2022)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-256-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{241},
  editor =	{Szeider, Stefan and Ganian, Robert and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2022.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-168313},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2022.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Boolean satisfiability problem, higher-order Boolean functions, weak k-EXP hierarchies, non-elementary complexity, Presburger arithmetic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2016.15
The Completeness of BCD for an Operational Semantics

Authors: Richard Statman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 97, 22nd International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2016)

Abstract
We give a completeness theorem for the BCD theory of intersection types in an operational semantics based on logical relations.
Cite as

Richard Statman. The Completeness of BCD for an Operational Semantics. In 22nd International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 97, pp. 15:1-15:5, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{statman:LIPIcs.TYPES.2016.15,
  author =	{Statman, Richard},
  title =	{{The Completeness of BCD for an Operational Semantics}},
  booktitle =	{22nd International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2016)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:5},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-065-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{97},
  editor =	{Ghilezan, Silvia and Geuvers, Herman and Ivetic, Jelena},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2016.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-98478},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2016.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: intersection types, operational semantics, Beth model, logical relations, forcing}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 6 Document/PDF
  • 4 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2025
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2018

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Chistikov, Dmitry
  • 1 Dezani-Ciancaglini, Mariangiola
  • 1 Dudenhefner, Andrej
  • 1 Erbatur, Serdar
  • 1 Giannini, Paola
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 6 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Lambda calculus
  • 1 Theory of computation → Equational logic and rewriting
  • 1 Theory of computation → Logic
  • 1 Theory of computation → Type theory

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 intersection types
  • 1 Beth model
  • 1 Boolean satisfiability problem
  • 1 Coq
  • 1 Decidability
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact