Evidence About Programmers for Programming Language Design (Dagstuhl Seminar 18061)

Authors Andreas Stefik, Bonita Sharif, Brad. A. Myers, Stefan Hanenberg and all authors of the abstracts in this report



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

DagRep.8.2.1.pdf
  • Filesize: 7.23 MB
  • 25 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Andreas Stefik
Bonita Sharif
Brad. A. Myers
Stefan Hanenberg
and all authors of the abstracts in this report

Cite AsGet BibTex

Andreas Stefik, Bonita Sharif, Brad. A. Myers, and Stefan Hanenberg. Evidence About Programmers for Programming Language Design (Dagstuhl Seminar 18061). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp. 1-25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.8.2.1

Abstract

The report documents the program and outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 18061 "Evidence About Programmers for Programming Language Design". The seminar brought together a diverse group of researchers from the fields of computer science education, programming languages, software engineering, human-computer interaction, and data science. At the seminar, participants discussed methods for designing and evaluating programming languages that take the needs of programmers directly into account. The seminar included foundational talks to introduce the breadth of perspectives that were represented among the participants; then, groups formed to develop research agendas for several subtopics, including novice programmers, cognitive load, language features, and love of programming languages. The seminar concluded with a discussion of the current SIGPLAN artifact evaluation mechanism and the need for evidence standards in empirical studies of programming languages.
Keywords
  • programming language design
  • computer science education
  • empirical software engineering
  • eye tracking
  • evidence standards

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail