From Proofs to Computation in Geometric Logic and Generalizations (Dagstuhl Seminar 24021)

Authors Ingo Blechschmidt, Hajime Ishihara, Peter M. Schuster, Gabriele Buriola and all authors of the abstracts in this report



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

DagRep.14.1.1.pdf
  • Filesize: 2.41 MB
  • 24 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Ingo Blechschmidt
  • Universität Augsburg, DE
Hajime Ishihara
  • Toho University - Chiba, JP
Peter M. Schuster
  • University of Verona, IT
Gabriele Buriola
  • University of Verona, IT
and all authors of the abstracts in this report

Cite AsGet BibTex

Ingo Blechschmidt, Hajime Ishihara, Peter M. Schuster, and Gabriele Buriola. From Proofs to Computation in Geometric Logic and Generalizations (Dagstuhl Seminar 24021). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp. 1-24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.14.1.1

Abstract

What is the computational content of proofs? This is one of the main topics in mathematical logic, especially proof theory, that is of relevance for computer science. The well-known foundational solutions aim at rebuilding mathematics constructively almost from scratch, and include Bishop-style constructive mathematics and Martin-Löf’s intuitionistic type theory, the latter most recently in the form of the so-called homotopy or univalent type theory put forward by Voevodsky. From a more practical angle, however, the question rather is to which extent any given proof is effective, which proofs of which theorems can be rendered effective, and whether and how numerical information such as bounds and algorithms can be extracted from proofs. Ideally, all this is done by manipulating proofs mechanically and/or by adequate metatheorems (proof translations, automated theorem proving, program extraction from proofs, proof mining, etc.). A crucial role for answering these questions is played by coherent and geometric theories and their generalizations: not only that they are fairly widespread in modern mathematics and non-classical logics (e.g., in abstract algebra, and in temporal and modal logics); those theories are also a priori amenable for constructivisation (see Barr’s Theorem, especially its proof-theoretic variants, and the numerous Glivenko–style theorems); last but not least, effective theorem-proving for coherent theories can be automated with relative ease and clarity in relation to resolution. Specific topics that substantially involve computer science research include categorical semantics for geometric theories up to the proof-theoretic presentation of sheaf models and higher toposes; extracting the computational content of proofs and dynamical methods in quadratic form theory; the interpretation of transfinite proof methods as latent computations; complexity issues of and algorithms for geometrization of theories; the use of geometric theories in constructive mathematics including finding algorithms, ideally with integrated developments; and coherent logic for obtaining automatically readable proofs.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Constructive mathematics
  • Theory of computation → Proof theory
  • Theory of computation → Automated reasoning
Keywords
  • automated theorem proving
  • categorical semantics
  • constructivisation
  • geometric logic
  • proof theory

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail