Eigenpath Traversal by Poisson-Distributed Phase Randomisation

Authors Joseph Cunningham , Jérémie Roland



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.TQC.2024.7.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.77 MB
  • 20 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Joseph Cunningham
  • Centre for Quantum Information and Communication (QuIC), Ecole polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
Jérémie Roland
  • Centre for Quantum Information and Communication (QuIC), Ecole polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium

Cite AsGet BibTex

Joseph Cunningham and Jérémie Roland. Eigenpath Traversal by Poisson-Distributed Phase Randomisation. In 19th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 310, pp. 7:1-7:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2024.7

Abstract

We present a framework for quantum computation, similar to Adiabatic Quantum Computation (AQC), that is based on the quantum Zeno effect. By performing randomised dephasing operations at intervals determined by a Poisson process, we are able to track the eigenspace associated to a particular eigenvalue. We derive a simple differential equation for the fidelity, leading to general theorems bounding the time complexity of a whole class of algorithms. We also use eigenstate filtering to optimise the scaling of the complexity in the error tolerance ε. In many cases the bounds given by our general theorems are optimal, giving a time complexity of O(1/Δ_m) with Δ_m the minimum of the gap. This allows us to prove optimal results using very general features of problems, minimising the problem-specific insight necessary. As two applications of our framework, we obtain optimal scaling for the Grover problem (i.e. O(√N) where N is the database size) and the Quantum Linear System Problem (i.e. O(κlog(1/ε)) where κ is the condition number and ε the error tolerance) by direct applications of our theorems.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Quantum computation theory
  • Theory of computation → Quantum complexity theory
Keywords
  • Randomisation method
  • Non-unitary adiabatic theorems
  • Grover problem
  • Quantum linear systems problem

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Dorit Aharonov, Wim van Dam, Julia Kempe, Zeph Landau, Seth Lloyd, and Oded Regev. Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation. In 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 42-51, 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2004.8.
  2. Dong An and Lin Lin. Quantum linear system solver based on time-optimal adiabatic quantum computing and quantum approximate optimization algorithm. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, 3(2):1-28, March 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3498331.
  3. Joseph E. Avron, Martin Fraas, Gian M. Graf, and Philip Grech. Adiabatic theorems for generators of contracting evolutions. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 314(1):163-191, May 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-012-1504-1.
  4. Sergio Boixo, Emanuel Knill, and Rolando Somma. Eigenpath traversal by phase randomization. Quantum Information and Computation, 9(9&10):833-855, September 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.26421/QIC9.9-10-7.
  5. Andrew M. Childs, Enrico Deotto, Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Sam Gutmann, and Andrew J. Landahl. Quantum search by measurement. Physical Review A, 66(3), September 2002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.66.032314.
  6. Pedro C. S. Costa, Dong An, Ryan Babbush, and Dominic Berry. The discrete adiabatic quantum linear system solver has lower constant factors than the randomized adiabatic solver, 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07690.
  7. Pedro C.S. Costa, Dong An, Yuval R. Sanders, Yuan Su, Ryan Babbush, and Dominic W. Berry. Optimal scaling quantum linear-systems solver via discrete adiabatic theorem. PRX Quantum, 3:040303, October 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.040303.
  8. Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Sam Gutmann, and Michael Sipser. Quantum computation by adiabatic evolution, 2000. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0001106.
  9. Lov K. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC '96, pages 212-219, New York, NY, USA, 1996. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/237814.237866.
  10. Aram W. Harrow, Avinatan Hassidim, and Seth Lloyd. Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. Physical Review Letters, 103(15), October 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.103.150502.
  11. Sabine Jansen, Mary-Beth Ruskai, and Ruedi Seiler. Bounds for the adiabatic approximation with applications to quantum computation. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 48(10), October 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2798382.
  12. David Jennings, Matteo Lostaglio, Sam Pallister, Andrew T Sornborger, and Yiğit Subaşı. Efficient quantum linear solver algorithm with detailed running costs, 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11352.
  13. Lin Lin and Yu Tong. Optimal polynomial based quantum eigenstate filtering with application to solving quantum linear systems. Quantum, 4:361, November 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-11-11-361.
  14. Andrew Lucas. Ising formulations of many NP problems. Frontiers in Physics, 2, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2014.00005.
  15. Peter Lynch. The dolph–chebyshev window: A simple optimal filter. Monthly Weather Review, 125(4):655-660, 1997. URL: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<0655:TDCWAS>2.0.CO;2.
  16. Ben W. Reichardt. The quantum adiabatic optimization algorithm and local minima. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC '04, pages 502-510, New York, NY, USA, 2004. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1007352.1007428.
  17. Jérémie Roland and Nicolas J. Cerf. Quantum search by local adiabatic evolution. Physical Review A, 65(4), March 2002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.65.042308.
  18. Jérémie Roland and Nicolas J. Cerf. Quantum-circuit model of hamiltonian search algorithms. Physical Review A, 68(6), December 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.68.062311.
  19. Yiğit Subaşı, Rolando D. Somma, and Davide Orsucci. Quantum algorithms for systems of linear equations inspired by adiabatic quantum computing. Physical Review Letters, 122(6), February 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.122.060504.
  20. Wim van Dam, Michele Mosca, and Umesh Vazirani. How powerful is adiabatic quantum computation? In Proceedings 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.2001.959902.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail