Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 3, Issue 2

TGDK, Volume 3, Issue 2



Publication Details

  • published at: 2025-10-15
  • Publisher: Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik

Access Numbers

Documents

No documents found matching your filter selection.
Document
Survey
Resilience in Knowledge Graph Embeddings

Authors: Arnab Sharma, N'Dah Jean Kouagou, and Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo


Abstract
In recent years, knowledge graphs have gained interest and witnessed widespread applications in various domains, such as information retrieval, question-answering, recommendation systems, amongst others. Large-scale knowledge graphs to this end have demonstrated their utility in effectively representing structured knowledge. To further facilitate the application of machine learning techniques, knowledge graph embedding models have been developed. Such models can transform entities and relationships within knowledge graphs into vectors. However, these embedding models often face challenges related to noise, missing information, distribution shift, adversarial attacks, etc. This can lead to sub-optimal embeddings and incorrect inferences, thereby negatively impacting downstream applications. While the existing literature has focused so far on adversarial attacks on KGE models, the challenges related to the other critical aspects remain unexplored. In this paper, we, first of all, give a unified definition of resilience, encompassing several factors such as generalisation, in-distribution generalization, distribution adaption, and robustness. After formalizing these concepts for machine learning in general, we define them in the context of knowledge graphs. To find the gap in the existing works on resilience in the context of knowledge graphs, we perform a systematic survey, taking into account all these aspects mentioned previously. Our survey results show that most of the existing works focus on a specific aspect of resilience, namely robustness. After categorizing such works based on their respective aspects of resilience, we discuss the challenges and future research directions.

Cite as

Arnab Sharma, N'Dah Jean Kouagou, and Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo. Resilience in Knowledge Graph Embeddings. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 1:1-1:38, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{sharma_et_al:TGDK.3.2.1,
  author =	{Sharma, Arnab and Kouagou, N'Dah Jean and Ngomo, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga},
  title =	{{Resilience in Knowledge Graph Embeddings}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{1:1--1:38},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{2},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.2.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248117},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.2.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge graphs, Resilience, Robustness}
}
Document
Research
Distances Between Formal Concept Analysis Structures

Authors: Alexandre Bazin and Giacomo Kahn


Abstract
In this paper, we study the notion of distance between the most important structures of formal concept analysis: formal contexts, concept lattices, and implication bases. We first define three families of Minkowski-like distances between these three structures. We then present experiments showing that the correlations of these distances are low and depend on the distance between formal contexts.

Cite as

Alexandre Bazin and Giacomo Kahn. Distances Between Formal Concept Analysis Structures. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 2:1-2:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{bazin_et_al:TGDK.3.2.2,
  author =	{Bazin, Alexandre and Kahn, Giacomo},
  title =	{{Distances Between Formal Concept Analysis Structures}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{2:1--2:18},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{2},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.2.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248126},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.2.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formal Concept Analysis, Implication Base, Concept Lattice, Pattern Mining, Ordinal Data Science}
}
Document
Research
GraphRAG on Technical Documents - Impact of Knowledge Graph Schema

Authors: Henri Scaffidi, Melinda Hodkiewicz, Caitlin Woods, and Nicole Roocke


Abstract
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is seeing rapid adoption in industry to enable employees to query information captured in proprietary data for their organisation. In this work, we test the impact of domain-relevant knowledge graph schemas on the results of Microsoft’s GraphRAG pipeline. Our approach aims to address the poor quality of GraphRAG responses on technical reports rich in domain-specific terms. The use case involves technical reports about geology, chemistry and mineral processing published by the Minerals Research Institute of Western Australia (MRIWA). Four schemas are considered: a simple five-class minerals domain expert-developed schema, an expanded minerals domain schema, the Microsoft GraphRAG auto-generated schema, and a schema-less GraphRAG. These are compared to a conventional baseline RAG. Performance is evaluated using a scoring approach that accounts for the mix of correct, incorrect, additional, and missing content in RAG responses. The results show that the simple five-class minerals domain schema extracts approximately 10% more entities from the MRIWA reports than the other schema options. Additionally, both the five-class and the expanded eight-class minerals domain schemas produce the most factually correct answers and the fewest hallucinations. We attribute this to the minerals-specific schemas extracting more relevant, domain-specific information during the Indexing stage. As a result, the Query stage’s context window includes more high-value content. This contributes to the observed improvement in answer quality compared to the other pipelines. In contrast, pipelines with fewer domain-related entities in the KG retrieve less valuable information, leaving more room for irrelevant content in the context window. Baseline RAG responses were typically shorter, less complete, and contained more hallucinations compared to our GraphRAG pipelines. We provide a complete set of resources at https://github.com/nlp-tlp/GraphRAG-on-Minerals-Domain/tree/main. These resources include links to the MRIWA reports, a set of questions (from simple to challenging) along with domain-expert curated answers, schemas, and evaluations of the pipelines.

Cite as

Henri Scaffidi, Melinda Hodkiewicz, Caitlin Woods, and Nicole Roocke. GraphRAG on Technical Documents - Impact of Knowledge Graph Schema. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 3:1-3:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{scaffidi_et_al:TGDK.3.2.3,
  author =	{Scaffidi, Henri and Hodkiewicz, Melinda and Woods, Caitlin and Roocke, Nicole},
  title =	{{GraphRAG on Technical Documents - Impact of Knowledge Graph Schema}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{3:1--3:24},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{2},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.2.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248131},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.2.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: RAG, minerals, local search, global search, entity extraction, competency questions}
}

Filters


Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail