3 Search Results for "Itzhaki, Michael"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.47
Minimizing the Number of Tardy Jobs with Uniform Processing Times on Parallel Machines

Authors: Klaus Heeger and Hendrik Molter

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
In this work, we study the computational (parameterized) complexity of P∣ r_j, p_j = p ∣∑ w_j U_j. Here, we are given m identical parallel machines and n jobs with equal processing time, each characterized by a release date, a due date, and a weight. The task is to find a feasible schedule, that is, an assignment of the jobs to starting times on machines, such that no job starts before its release date and no machine processes several jobs at the same time, that minimizes the weighted number of tardy jobs. A job is considered tardy if it finishes after its due date. Our main contribution is showing that P∣r_j, p_j = p∣∑ U_j (the unweighted version of the problem) is NP-hard and W[2]-hard when parameterized by the number of machines. The former resolves an open problem in Note 2.1.19 by Kravchenko and Werner [Journal of Scheduling, 2011] and Open Problem 2 by Sgall [ESA, 2012], and the latter resolves Open Problem 7 by Mnich and van Bevern [Computers & Operations Research, 2018]. Furthermore, our result shows that the known XP-algorithm by Baptiste et al. [4OR, 2004] for P∣r_j, p_j = p∣∑ w_j U_j parameterized by the number of machines is optimal from a classification standpoint. On the algorithmic side, we provide alternative running time bounds for the above-mentioned known XP-algorithm. Our analysis shows that P∣r_j, p_j = p∣∑ w_j U_j is contained in XP when parameterized by the processing time, and that it is contained in FPT when parameterized by the combination of the number of machines and the processing time. Finally, we give an FPT-algorithm for P∣r_j, p_j = p∣∑ w_j U_j parameterized by the number of release dates or the number of due dates. With this work, we lay out the foundation for a systematic study of the parameterized complexity of P∣r_j, p_j = p∣∑ w_j U_j.
Cite as

Klaus Heeger and Hendrik Molter. Minimizing the Number of Tardy Jobs with Uniform Processing Times on Parallel Machines. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 47:1-47:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{heeger_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.47,
  author =	{Heeger, Klaus and Molter, Hendrik},
  title =	{{Minimizing the Number of Tardy Jobs with Uniform Processing Times on Parallel Machines}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{47:1--47:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.47},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228736},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.47},
  annote =	{Keywords: Scheduling, Identical Parallel Machines, Weighted Number of Tardy Jobs, Uniform Processing Times, Release Dates, NP-hard Problems, Parameterized Complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2024.2
Reconstructing General Matching Graphs

Authors: Amihood Amir and Michael Itzhaki

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 296, 35th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2024)

Abstract
The classical pattern matching paradigm is that of seeking occurrences of one string in another, where both strings are drawn from an alphabet set Σ. Motivated by many applications, algorithms were developed for pattern matching where the matching relation is not necessarily the "=" relation. Examples are pattern matching with "don't cares", approximate matching, less-than matching, Cartesian-tree matching, order preserving matching, parameterized matching, degenerate matching, function matching, and more. Some of the matchings above allow for efficient pattern matching algorithms, while others do not. Much work has not been done on categorization of the complexity of various string matching queries based on the type of matching. For example, when can exact matching be done fast? When can approximate matching be calculated fast? When can tandem or palindrome recognition be efficiently calculated? This paper defines the matching graph of a given string under a matching relation. We show that the type of graph affects various string algorithms. The matching graph can also be a tool for lower bounds. We provide a lower bound for finding palindromes in a general degenerate graph. We also show some results in recognizing the minimum alphabet required for reconstructing a string that presents a given matching graph.
Cite as

Amihood Amir and Michael Itzhaki. Reconstructing General Matching Graphs. In 35th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 296, pp. 2:1-2:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{amir_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2024.2,
  author =	{Amir, Amihood and Itzhaki, Michael},
  title =	{{Reconstructing General Matching Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{35th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2024)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-326-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{296},
  editor =	{Inenaga, Shunsuke and Puglisi, Simon J.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2024.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-201120},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2024.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Pattern Matching, Matching Graphs, Reconstruction, NP-hardness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2020.5
Analysis of the Period Recovery Error Bound

Authors: Amihood Amir, Itai Boneh, Michael Itzhaki, and Eitan Kondratovsky

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 173, 28th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2020)

Abstract
The recovery problem is the problem whose input is a corrupted text T that was originally periodic, and where one wishes to recover its original period. The algorithm’s input is T without any information about either the period’s length or the period itself. An algorithm that solves this problem is called a recovery algorithm. In order to make recovery possible, there must be some assumption that not "too many" errors corrupted the initial periodic string. This is called the error bound. In previous recovery algorithms, it was shown that a given error bound of n/((2+ε)p) can lead to O(log_{1+ε} n) period candidates, that are guaranteed to include the original period, where p is the length of the original period (unknown by the algorithm) and ε > 0 is an arbitrary constant. This paper provides the first analysis of the relationship between the error bound and the number of candidates, as well as identification of the error parameters that still guarantee recovery. We improve the previously known upper error bound on the number of corruptions, n/((2+ε)p), that outputs O(log_{1+ε} n) period candidates. We show how to (1) remove ε from the bound, (2) relax the error bound to allow more errors while keeping the candidates set of size O(log n). It turns out that this relaxation on the previously known upper bound is quite challenging. To achieve this result we provide what, to our knowledge, is the first known non-trivial lower bound on the Hamming distance between two periodic strings. This proof leads to an error bound, that produces a family of period candidates of size 2log₃ n. We show that this result is tight and further provide a compact representation of the period candidates. We call this representation the canonic period seed. In addition to providing less restrictive error bounds that guarantee a smaller candidate set, we also provide a hierarchy of more restrictive upper error bounds that asymptotically reduces the size of the potential period candidate set.
Cite as

Amihood Amir, Itai Boneh, Michael Itzhaki, and Eitan Kondratovsky. Analysis of the Period Recovery Error Bound. In 28th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 173, pp. 5:1-5:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{amir_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2020.5,
  author =	{Amir, Amihood and Boneh, Itai and Itzhaki, Michael and Kondratovsky, Eitan},
  title =	{{Analysis of the Period Recovery Error Bound}},
  booktitle =	{28th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2020)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-162-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{173},
  editor =	{Grandoni, Fabrizio and Herman, Grzegorz and Sanders, Peter},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2020.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-128717},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2020.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Period Recovery, Period Recovery Hierarchy, Hamming Distance}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 3 Document/PDF
  • 1 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2020

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Amir, Amihood
  • 2 Itzhaki, Michael
  • 1 Boneh, Itai
  • 1 Heeger, Klaus
  • 1 Kondratovsky, Eitan
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 3 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Pattern matching
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Planning and scheduling
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Discrete mathematics
  • 1 Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
  • 1 Theory of computation → Sorting and searching

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Hamming Distance
  • 1 Identical Parallel Machines
  • 1 Matching Graphs
  • 1 NP-hard Problems
  • 1 NP-hardness
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact