8 Search Results for "Kästner, Christian"

Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7
Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications (Invited Paper)

Authors: Markus Krötzsch

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
Pure Datalog is arguably the most fundamental rule language, elegant and simple, but also often too limited to be useful in practice. This has motivated the introduction of many new expressive features, ranging from datatypes and related functions, over aggregates and semi-ring generalisations, to existential quantifiers and complex terms. In spite of their variety, all these approaches remain true to the nature of Datalog as a direct, pattern-based way of computing on structured data. We therefore find that a modern notion of Datalog is emerging, distinctly different from other approaches of logic programming and with its own set of related methods and applications. In this course, we introduce Datalog and its most common extensions, and explain when and how these features can be used together (which is often, but not always, safe to do). We further look at modern Datalog systems and some of their primary use cases. Hands-on work with Datalog and its extensions is done with the free Datalog engine https://knowsys.github.io/nemo-doc/. The course is accessible to all audiences and does not assume specific prior knowledge.
Cite as

Markus Krötzsch. Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 7:1-7:41, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{krotzsch:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7,
  author =	{Kr\"{o}tzsch, Markus},
  title =	{{Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:41},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250524},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Datalog, query language, knowlegde representation and reasoning, logic programming, Horn logic, SPARQL, datatypes and aggregation, lecture notes, tutorial}
}
Document
Experience Paper
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.37
RacerF: Lightweight Static Data Race Detection for C Code (Experience Paper)

Authors: Tomáš Dacík and Tomáš Vojnar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
We present RacerF, a novel static analyser for thread-modular data race detection. The approach behind RacerF exploits static analysis of sequential program behaviour whose results are generalised for multi-threaded programs using a combination of lightweight under- and over-approximating methods. The tool is implemented as a plugin of the Frama-C platform and can leverage several analysis backends, most notably the Frama-C’s abstract interpreter EVA. Although our methods are mostly heuristic without providing formal guarantees, our experimental evaluation shows that even for intricate programs, RacerF can provide very precise results competitive with more heavyweight approaches while being faster than them.
Cite as

Tomáš Dacík and Tomáš Vojnar. RacerF: Lightweight Static Data Race Detection for C Code (Experience Paper). In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 37:1-37:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dacik_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.37,
  author =	{Dac{\'\i}k, Tom\'{a}\v{s} and Vojnar, Tom\'{a}\v{s}},
  title =	{{RacerF: Lightweight Static Data Race Detection for C Code}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233298},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: concurrency, data race detection, static analysis}
}
Document
Replication Paper
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.40
Scaling Up: Revisiting Mining Android Sandboxes at Scale for Malware Classification (Replication Paper)

Authors: Francisco Handrick Tomaz da Costa, Ismael Medeiros, Leandro Oliveira, João Calássio, Rodrigo Bonifácio, Krishna Narasimhan, Mira Mezini, and Márcio Ribeiro

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
The widespread use of smartphones in daily life has raised concerns about privacy and security among researchers and practitioners. Privacy issues are generally highly prevalent in mobile applications, particularly targeting the Android platform - the most popular mobile operating system. For this reason, several techniques have been proposed to identify malicious behavior in Android applications, including the Mining Android Sandbox approach (MAS approach), which aims to identify malicious behavior in repackaged Android applications (apps). However, previous empirical studies evaluated the MAS approach using a small dataset consisting of only 102 pairs of original and repackaged apps. This limitation raises questions about the external validity of their findings and whether the MAS approach can be generalized to larger datasets. To address these concerns, this paper presents the results of a replication study focused on evaluating the performance of the MAS approach regarding its capabilities of correctly classifying malware from different families. Unlike previous studies, our research employs a dataset that is an order of magnitude larger, comprising 4,076 pairs of apps covering a more diverse range of Android malware families. Surprisingly, our findings indicate a poor performance of the MAS approach for identifying malware, with the F1-score decreasing from 0.90 for the small dataset used in the previous studies to 0.54 in our more extensive dataset. Upon closer examination, we discovered that certain malware families partially account for the low accuracy of the MAS approach, which fails to classify a repackaged version of an app as malware correctly. Our findings highlight the limitations of the MAS approach, particularly when scaled, and underscore the importance of complementing it with other techniques to detect a broader range of malware effectively. This opens avenues for further discussion on addressing the blind spots that affect the accuracy of the MAS approach.
Cite as

Francisco Handrick Tomaz da Costa, Ismael Medeiros, Leandro Oliveira, João Calássio, Rodrigo Bonifácio, Krishna Narasimhan, Mira Mezini, and Márcio Ribeiro. Scaling Up: Revisiting Mining Android Sandboxes at Scale for Malware Classification (Replication Paper). In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 40:1-40:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{handricktomazdacosta_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.40,
  author =	{Handrick Tomaz da Costa, Francisco and Medeiros, Ismael and Oliveira, Leandro and Cal\'{a}ssio, Jo\~{a}o and Bonif\'{a}cio, Rodrigo and Narasimhan, Krishna and Mezini, Mira and Ribeiro, M\'{a}rcio},
  title =	{{Scaling Up: Revisiting Mining Android Sandboxes at Scale for Malware Classification}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{40:1--40:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.40},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233320},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.40},
  annote =	{Keywords: Android Malware Detection, Dynamic Analysis, Mining Android Sandboxes}
}
Document
Pearl/Brave New Idea
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.42
Contract Systems Need Domain-Specific Notations (Pearl/Brave New Idea)

Authors: Cameron Moy, Ryan Jung, and Matthias Felleisen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Contract systems enable programmers to state specifications and have them enforced at run time. First-order contracts are expressed using ordinary code, while higher-order contracts are expressed using the notation familiar from type systems. Most interface descriptions, though, come with properties that involve not just assertions about single method calls, but entire call chains. Typical contract systems cannot express these specifications concisely. Such specifications demand domain-specific notations. In response, this paper proposes that contract systems abstract over the notation used for stating specifications. It presents an architecture for such a system, some illustrative examples, and an evaluation in terms of common notations from the literature.
Cite as

Cameron Moy, Ryan Jung, and Matthias Felleisen. Contract Systems Need Domain-Specific Notations (Pearl/Brave New Idea). In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 42:1-42:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{moy_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.42,
  author =	{Moy, Cameron and Jung, Ryan and Felleisen, Matthias},
  title =	{{Contract Systems Need Domain-Specific Notations}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{42:1--42:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.42},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233348},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.42},
  annote =	{Keywords: software contracts, domain-specific languages}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES.8.2.4
A Hybrid Programming Language for Formal Modeling and Verification of Hybrid Systems

Authors: Eduard Kamburjan, Stefan Mitsch, and Reiner Hähnle

Published in: LITES, Volume 8, Issue 2 (2022): Special Issue on Distributed Hybrid Systems. Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 8, Issue 2

Abstract
Designing and modeling complex cyber-physical systems (CPS) faces the double challenge of combined discrete-continuous dynamics and concurrent behavior. Existing formal modeling and verification languages for CPS expose the underlying proof search technology. They lack high-level structuring elements and are not efficiently executable. The ensuing modeling gap renders formal CPS models hard to understand and to validate. We propose a high-level programming-based approach to formal modeling and verification of hybrid systems as a hybrid extension of an Active Objects language. Well-structured hybrid active programs and requirements allow automatic, reachability-preserving translation into differential dynamic logic, a logic for hybrid (discrete-continuous) programs. Verification is achieved by discharging the resulting formulas with the theorem prover KeYmaera X. We demonstrate the usability of our approach with case studies.
Cite as

Eduard Kamburjan, Stefan Mitsch, and Reiner Hähnle. A Hybrid Programming Language for Formal Modeling and Verification of Hybrid Systems. In LITES, Volume 8, Issue 2 (2022): Special Issue on Distributed Hybrid Systems. Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp. 04:1-04:34, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{kamburjan_et_al:LITES.8.2.4,
  author =	{Kamburjan, Eduard and Mitsch, Stefan and H\"{a}hnle, Reiner},
  title =	{{A Hybrid Programming Language for Formal Modeling and Verification of Hybrid Systems}},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  pages =	{04:1--04:34},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{8},
  number =	{2},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES.8.2.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-192965},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES.8.2.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Active Objects, Differential Dynamic Logic, Hybrid Systems}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2019.1
TimeWeaver: A Tool for Hybrid Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis

Authors: Daniel Kästner, Markus Pister, Simon Wegener, and Christian Ferdinand

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 72, 19th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2019)

Abstract
Many embedded control applications have real-time requirements. If the application is safety-relevant, worst-case execution time bounds have to be determined in order to demonstrate deadline adherence. For high-performance multi-core architectures with degraded timing predictability, WCET bounds can be computed by hybrid WCET analysis which combines static analysis with timing measurements. This article focuses on a novel tool for hybrid WCET analysis based on non-intrusive instruction-level real-time tracing.
Cite as

Daniel Kästner, Markus Pister, Simon Wegener, and Christian Ferdinand. TimeWeaver: A Tool for Hybrid Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis. In 19th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2019). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 72, pp. 1:1-1:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kastner_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2019.1,
  author =	{K\"{a}stner, Daniel and Pister, Markus and Wegener, Simon and Ferdinand, Christian},
  title =	{{TimeWeaver: A Tool for Hybrid Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis}},
  booktitle =	{19th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2019)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:11},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-118-4},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{72},
  editor =	{Altmeyer, Sebastian},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2019.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-107661},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2019.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) Analysis, Real-time Tracing, Functional Safety}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DARTS.1.1.7
The Love/Hate Relationship with the C Preprocessor: An Interview Study (Artifact)

Authors: Flávio Medeiros, Christian Kästner, Márcio Ribeiro, Sarah Nadi, and Rohit Gheyi

Published in: DARTS, Volume 1, Issue 1, Special Issue of the 29th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2015)

Abstract
This appendix presents detailed information about the research methods we used in the study, subject characterization, grounded theory process that we followed strictly, and the survey we performed in the study. It provides helpful data for understanding the subtler points of the companion paper and for reproducibility.
Cite as

Flávio Medeiros, Christian Kästner, Márcio Ribeiro, Sarah Nadi, and Rohit Gheyi. The Love/Hate Relationship with the C Preprocessor: An Interview Study (Artifact). In Special Issue of the 29th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2015). Dagstuhl Artifacts Series (DARTS), Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 7:1-7:32, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{medeiros_et_al:DARTS.1.1.7,
  author =	{Medeiros, Fl\'{a}vio and K\"{a}stner, Christian and Ribeiro, M\'{a}rcio and Nadi, Sarah and Gheyi, Rohit},
  title =	{{The Love/Hate Relationship with the C Preprocessor: An Interview Study (Artifact)}},
  pages =	{7:1--7:32},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Artifacts Series},
  ISSN =	{2509-8195},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{1},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Medeiros, Fl\'{a}vio and K\"{a}stner, Christian and Ribeiro, M\'{a}rcio and Nadi, Sarah and Gheyi, Rohit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DARTS.1.1.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-55162},
  doi =		{10.4230/DARTS.1.1.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: C Preprocessor, CPP, Interviews, Surveys, and Grounded Theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2015.495
The Love/Hate Relationship with the C Preprocessor: An Interview Study

Authors: Flávio Medeiros, Christian Kästner, Márcio Ribeiro, Sarah Nadi, and Rohit Gheyi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 37, 29th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2015)

Abstract
The C preprocessor has received strong criticism in academia, among others regarding separation of concerns, error proneness, and code obfuscation, but is widely used in practice. Many (mostly academic) alternatives to the preprocessor exist, but have not been adopted in practice. Since developers continue to use the preprocessor despite all criticism and research, we ask how practitioners perceive the C preprocessor. We performed interviews with 40 developers, used grounded theory to analyze the data, and cross-validated the results with data from a survey among 202 developers, repository mining, and results from previous studies. In particular, we investigated four research questions related to why the preprocessor is still widely used in practice, common problems, alternatives, and the impact of undisciplined annotations. Our study shows that developers are aware of the criticism the C preprocessor receives, but use it nonetheless, mainly for portability and variability. Many developers indicate that they regularly face preprocessor-related problems and preprocessor-related bugs. The majority of our interviewees do not see any current C-native technologies that can entirely replace the C preprocessor. However, developers tend to mitigate problems with guidelines, even though those guidelines are not enforced consistently. We report the key insights gained from our study and discuss implications for practitioners and researchers on how to better use the C preprocessor to minimize its negative impact.
Cite as

Flávio Medeiros, Christian Kästner, Márcio Ribeiro, Sarah Nadi, and Rohit Gheyi. The Love/Hate Relationship with the C Preprocessor: An Interview Study. In 29th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2015). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 37, pp. 495-518, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{medeiros_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2015.495,
  author =	{Medeiros, Fl\'{a}vio and K\"{a}stner, Christian and Ribeiro, M\'{a}rcio and Nadi, Sarah and Gheyi, Rohit},
  title =	{{The Love/Hate Relationship with the C Preprocessor: An Interview Study}},
  booktitle =	{29th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2015)},
  pages =	{495--518},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-86-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{37},
  editor =	{Boyland, John Tang},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2015.495},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-52350},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2015.495},
  annote =	{Keywords: C Preprocessor, CPP, Interviews, Surveys, and Grounded Theory}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 8 Document/PDF
  • 4 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2025
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2019
  • 2 2015

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Ribeiro, Márcio
  • 2 Gheyi, Rohit
  • 2 Kästner, Christian
  • 2 Medeiros, Flávio
  • 2 Nadi, Sarah
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 4 LIPIcs
  • 2 OASIcs
  • 1 DARTS
  • 1 LITES

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Real-time systems
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Distributed programming languages
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Logic programming and answer set programming
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Model verification and validation
  • 1 Security and privacy → Malware and its mitigation
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 C Preprocessor
  • 2 CPP
  • 2 Interviews
  • 2 Surveys
  • 2 and Grounded Theory
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact