3 Search Results for "Meißner, Julie"


Document
Scheduling with Explorable Uncertainty

Authors: Christoph Dürr, Thomas Erlebach, Nicole Megow, and Julie Meißner

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 94, 9th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2018)


Abstract
We introduce a novel model for scheduling with explorable uncertainty. In this model, the processing time of a job can potentially be reduced (by an a priori unknown amount) by testing the job. Testing a job j takes one unit of time and may reduce its processing time from the given upper limit p'_j (which is the time taken to execute the job if it is not tested) to any value between 0 and p'_j. This setting is motivated e.g. by applications where a code optimizer can be run on a job before executing it. We consider the objective of minimizing the sum of completion times on a single machine. All jobs are available from the start, but the reduction in their processing times as a result of testing is unknown, making this an online problem that is amenable to competitive analysis. The need to balance the time spent on tests and the time spent on job executions adds a novel flavor to the problem. We give the first and nearly tight lower and upper bounds on the competitive ratio for deterministic and randomized algorithms. We also show that minimizing the makespan is a considerably easier problem for which we give optimal deterministic and randomized online algorithms.

Cite as

Christoph Dürr, Thomas Erlebach, Nicole Megow, and Julie Meißner. Scheduling with Explorable Uncertainty. In 9th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 94, pp. 30:1-30:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{durr_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2018.30,
  author =	{D\"{u}rr, Christoph and Erlebach, Thomas and Megow, Nicole and Mei{\ss}ner, Julie},
  title =	{{Scheduling with Explorable Uncertainty}},
  booktitle =	{9th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2018)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-060-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{94},
  editor =	{Karlin, Anna R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2018.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-83360},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2018.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: online scheduling, explorable uncertainty, competitive ratio, makespan, sum of completion times}
}
Document
Minimum Spanning Tree under Explorable Uncertainty in Theory and Experiments

Authors: Jacob Focke, Nicole Megow, and Julie Meißner

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 75, 16th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2017)


Abstract
We consider the minimum spanning tree (MST) problem in an uncertainty model where uncertain edge weights can be explored at extra cost. The task is to find an MST by querying a minimum number of edges for their exact weight. This problem has received quite some attention from the algorithms theory community. In this paper, we conduct the first practical experiments for MST under uncertainty, theoretically compare three known algorithms, and compare theoretical with practical behavior of the algorithms. Among others, we observe that the average performance and the absolute number of queries are both far from the theoretical worst-case bounds. Furthermore, we investigate a known general preprocessing procedure and develop an implementation thereof that maximally reduces the data uncertainty. We also characterize a class of instances that is solved completely by our preprocessing. Our experiments are based on practical data from an application in telecommunications and uncertainty instances generated from the standard TSPLib graph library.

Cite as

Jacob Focke, Nicole Megow, and Julie Meißner. Minimum Spanning Tree under Explorable Uncertainty in Theory and Experiments. In 16th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 75, pp. 22:1-22:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{focke_et_al:LIPIcs.SEA.2017.22,
  author =	{Focke, Jacob and Megow, Nicole and Mei{\ss}ner, Julie},
  title =	{{Minimum Spanning Tree under Explorable Uncertainty in Theory and Experiments}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2017)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-036-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{75},
  editor =	{Iliopoulos, Costas S. and Pissis, Solon P. and Puglisi, Simon J. and Raman, Rajeev},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2017.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-76202},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2017.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: MST, explorable uncertainty, competitive ratio, experimental algorithms}
}
Document
A QPTAS for the General Scheduling Problem with Identical Release Dates

Authors: Antonios Antoniadis, Ruben Hoeksma, Julie Meißner, José Verschae, and Andreas Wiese

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 80, 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017)


Abstract
The General Scheduling Problem (GSP) generalizes scheduling problems with sum of cost objectives such as weighted flow time and weighted tardiness. Given a set of jobs with processing times, release dates, and job dependent cost functions, we seek to find a minimum cost preemptive schedule on a single machine. The best known algorithm for this problem and also for weighted flow time/tardiness is an O(loglog P)-approximation (where P denotes the range of the job processing times), while the best lower bound shows only strong NP-hardness. When release dates are identical there is also a gap: the problem remains strongly NP-hard and the best known approximation algorithm has a ratio of e+\epsilon (running in quasi-polynomial time). We reduce the latter gap by giving a QPTAS if the numbers in the input are quasi-polynomially bounded, ruling out the existence of an APX-hardness proof unless NP\subseteq DTIME(2^polylog(n)). Our techniques are based on the QPTAS known for the UFP-Cover problem, a particular case of GSP where we must pick a subset of intervals (jobs) on the real line with associated heights and costs. If an interval is selected, its height will help cover a given demand on any point contained within the interval. We reduce our problem to a generalization of UFP-Cover and use a sophisticated divide-and-conquer procedure with interdependent non-symmetric subproblems. We also present a pseudo-polynomial time approximation scheme for two variants of UFP-Cover. For the case of agreeable intervals we give an algorithm based on a new dynamic programming approach which might be useful for other problems of this type. The second one is a resource augmentation setting where we are allowed to slightly enlarge each interval.

Cite as

Antonios Antoniadis, Ruben Hoeksma, Julie Meißner, José Verschae, and Andreas Wiese. A QPTAS for the General Scheduling Problem with Identical Release Dates. In 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 80, pp. 31:1-31:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{antoniadis_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.31,
  author =	{Antoniadis, Antonios and Hoeksma, Ruben and Mei{\ss}ner, Julie and Verschae, Jos\'{e} and Wiese, Andreas},
  title =	{{A QPTAS for the General Scheduling Problem with Identical Release Dates}},
  booktitle =	{44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-041-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{80},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Indyk, Piotr and Kuhn, Fabian and Muscholl, Anca},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-74575},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Generalized Scheduling, QPTAS, Unsplittable Flows}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Meißner, Julie
  • 2 Megow, Nicole
  • 1 Antoniadis, Antonios
  • 1 Dürr, Christoph
  • 1 Erlebach, Thomas
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 competitive ratio
  • 2 explorable uncertainty
  • 1 Generalized Scheduling
  • 1 MST
  • 1 QPTAS
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 3 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2017
  • 1 2018

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail