Read-Once Branching Programs for Tree Evaluation Problems

Authors Kazuo Iwama, Atsuki Nagao



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.STACS.2014.409.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.73 MB
  • 12 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Kazuo Iwama
Atsuki Nagao

Cite As Get BibTex

Kazuo Iwama and Atsuki Nagao. Read-Once Branching Programs for Tree Evaluation Problems. In 31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2014). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 25, pp. 409-420, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2014) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2014.409

Abstract

Toward the ultimate goal of separating L and P, Cook, McKenzie, Wehr, Braverman and Santhanam introduced the tree evaluation problem (TEP). For fixed h, k>0, FT_h(k) is given as a complete, rooted binary tree of height h, in which each internal node is associated with a function from [k]^2 to [k], and each leaf node with a number in [k]. The value of an internal node v is defined naturally, i.e., if it has a function f and the values of its two child nodes are a and b, then the value of v is f(a,b). Our task is to compute the value of the root node by sequentially executing this function evaluation in a bottom-up fashion. The problem is obviously in P and if we could prove that any branching program solving FT_h(k) needs at least k^(r(h)) states for any unbounded function r, then this problem is not in L, thus achieving our goal. The above authors introduced a restriction called thrifty against the structure of BP’s (i,e., against the algorithm for solving the problem) and proved that any thrifty BP needs Omega(k^h) states. This paper proves a similar lower bound for read-once branching programs, which allows us to get rid of the restriction on the order of nodes read by the BP that is the nature of the thrifty restriction.

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • Lower bounds
  • Branching Programs
  • Read-Once Branching Programs
  • Space Complexity
  • Combinatorics

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail