Search Results

Documents authored by Itzhaky, Shachar

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.22
Constrictor: Immutability as a Design Concept

Authors: Elad Kinsbruner, Shachar Itzhaky, and Hila Peleg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 313, 38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024)

Abstract
Many object-oriented applications in algorithm design rely on objects never changing during their lifetime. This is often tackled by marking object references as read-only, e.g., using the const keyword in C++. In other languages like Python or Java where such a concept does not exist, programmers rely on best practices that are entirely unenforced. While reliance on best practices is obviously too permissive, const-checking is too restrictive: it is possible for a method to mutate the internal state while still satisfying the property we expect from an "immutable" object in this setting. We would therefore like to enforce the immutability of an object’s abstract state. We check an object’s immutability through a view of its abstract state: for instances of an immutable class, the view does not change when running any of the class’s methods, even if some of the internal state does change. If all methods of a class are verified as non-mutating, we can deem the entire class view-immutable. We present an SMT-based algorithm to check view-immutability, and implement it in our linter/verifier, Constrictor. We evaluate Constrictor on 51 examples of immutability-related design violations. Our evaluation shows that Constrictor is effective at catching a variety of prototypical design violations, and does so in seconds. We also explore Constrictor with two real-world case studies.
Cite as

Elad Kinsbruner, Shachar Itzhaky, and Hila Peleg. Constrictor: Immutability as a Design Concept. In 38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 313, pp. 22:1-22:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kinsbruner_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.22,
  author =	{Kinsbruner, Elad and Itzhaky, Shachar and Peleg, Hila},
  title =	{{Constrictor: Immutability as a Design Concept}},
  booktitle =	{38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-341-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{313},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Salvaneschi, Guido},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-208715},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Immutability, Design Enforcement, SMT, Liskov Substitution Principle, Object-oriented Programming}
}
Document
Artifact
DOI: 10.4230/DARTS.10.2.9
Constrictor: Immutability as a Design Concept (Artifact)

Authors: Elad Kinsbruner, Shachar Itzhaky, and Hila Peleg

Published in: DARTS, Volume 10, Issue 2, Special Issue of the 38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024)

Abstract
Many object-oriented applications in algorithm design rely on objects never changing during their lifetime. This is often tackled by marking object references as read-only, e.g., using the const keyword in C++. In other languages like Python or Java where such a concept does not exist, programmers rely on best practices that are entirely unenforced. While reliance on best practices is obviously too permissive, const-checking is too restrictive: it is possible for a method to mutate the internal state while still satisfying the property we expect from an "immutable" object in this setting. We would therefore like to enforce the immutability of an object’s abstract state. We check an object’s immutability through a view of its abstract state: for instances of an immutable class, the view does not change when running any of the class’s methods, even if some of the internal state does change. If all methods of a class are verified as non-mutating, we can deem the entire class view-immutable. We present an SMT-based algorithm to check view-immutability, and implement it in our linter/verifier, Constrictor. We evaluate Constrictor on 51 examples of immutability-related design violations. Our evaluation shows that Constrictor is effective at catching a variety of prototypical design violations, and does so in seconds. We also explore Constrictor with two real-world case studies.
Cite as

Elad Kinsbruner, Shachar Itzhaky, and Hila Peleg. Constrictor: Immutability as a Design Concept (Artifact). In Special Issue of the 38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024). Dagstuhl Artifacts Series (DARTS), Volume 10, Issue 2, pp. 9:1-9:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{kinsbruner_et_al:DARTS.10.2.9,
  author =	{Kinsbruner, Elad and Itzhaky, Shachar and Peleg, Hila},
  title =	{{Constrictor: Immutability as a Design Concept (Artifact)}},
  pages =	{9:1--9:4},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Artifacts Series},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-342-3},
  ISSN =	{2509-8195},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{10},
  number =	{2},
  editor =	{Kinsbruner, Elad and Itzhaky, Shachar and Peleg, Hila},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DARTS.10.2.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-209071},
  doi =		{10.4230/DARTS.10.2.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Immutability, Design Enforcement, SMT, Liskov Substitution Principle, Object-oriented Programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2017.16
On the Automated Verification of Web Applications with Embedded SQL

Authors: Shachar Itzhaky, Tomer Kotek, Noam Rinetzky, Mooly Sagiv, Orr Tamir, Helmut Veith, and Florian Zuleger

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 68, 20th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2017)

Abstract
A large number of web applications is based on a relational database together with a program, typically a script, that enables the user to interact with the database through embedded SQL queries and commands. In this paper, we introduce a method for formal automated verification of such systems which connects database theory to mainstream program analysis. We identify a fragment of SQL which captures the behavior of the queries in our case studies, is algorithmically decidable, and facilitates the construction of weakest preconditions. Thus, we can integrate the analysis of SQL queries into a program analysis tool chain. To this end, we implement a new decision procedure for the SQL fragment that we introduce. We demonstrate practical applicability of our results with three case studies, a web administrator, a simple firewall, and a conference management system.
Cite as

Shachar Itzhaky, Tomer Kotek, Noam Rinetzky, Mooly Sagiv, Orr Tamir, Helmut Veith, and Florian Zuleger. On the Automated Verification of Web Applications with Embedded SQL. In 20th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 68, pp. 16:1-16:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{itzhaky_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2017.16,
  author =	{Itzhaky, Shachar and Kotek, Tomer and Rinetzky, Noam and Sagiv, Mooly and Tamir, Orr and Veith, Helmut and Zuleger, Florian},
  title =	{{On the Automated Verification of Web Applications with Embedded SQL}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2017)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-024-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{68},
  editor =	{Benedikt, Michael and Orsi, Giorgio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2017.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-70509},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2017.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: SQL; scripting language; web services; program verification; two-variable fragment of first order logic; decidability; reasoning}
}
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact