Search Results

Documents authored by Miller, Jacob

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.38
Stress in Graph Drawings: Perception, Preference, and Performance

Authors: Gavin J. Mooney, Jacob Miller, Michael Wybrow, Stephen Kobourov, and Helen C. Purchase

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
Stress in a graph drawing has been a popular layout principle for more than two decades. Low stress drawings exhibit the property that the geometric distances between all pairs of nodes correlate with the shortest paths between them. The assumption has always been that low stress drawings are "nicer" and better support human perception and comprehension than high stress drawings. In this paper, we put these assumptions to the test. We use a normalised scale-independent and rotation-independent metric for stress; this is necessary to ensure strict controls on our experimental stimuli. We report on three experiments, exploring human perception of stress, preference for stress, and the effect of stress on a graph performance task. We conclude that people can see stress in a graph drawing, that they prefer low stress drawings, and that their performance in a shortest path task improves as stress decreases - thus empirically confirming long-standing assumptions.
Cite as

Gavin J. Mooney, Jacob Miller, Michael Wybrow, Stephen Kobourov, and Helen C. Purchase. Stress in Graph Drawings: Perception, Preference, and Performance. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 38:1-38:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mooney_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.38,
  author =	{Mooney, Gavin J. and Miller, Jacob and Wybrow, Michael and Kobourov, Stephen and Purchase, Helen C.},
  title =	{{Stress in Graph Drawings: Perception, Preference, and Performance}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{38:1--38:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.38},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250240},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.38},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph Drawing, Graph Drawing Metrics, Stress, Visual Perception, User Study}
}
Document
Poster Abstract
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.48
Drawing Trees and Cacti with Integer Edge Lengths on a Polynomial-Size Grid (Poster Abstract)

Authors: Henry Förster, Stephen Kobourov, Jacob Miller, and Johannes Zink

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
A strengthened version of Harborth’s well-known conjecture - known as Kleber’s conjecture - states that every planar graph admits a planar straight-line drawing where every edge has integer length and each vertex is restricted to the integer grid. Positive results for Kleber’s conjecture are known for planar 3-regular graphs, for planar graphs that have maximum degree 4, and for planar 3-trees. However, all but one of the existing results are existential and do not provide bounds on the required grid size. We provide polynomial-time algorithms for computing crossing-free straight-line drawings of trees and cactus graphs with integer edge lengths and integer vertex position on polynomial-size integer grids. We also give an historic overview of planar straight-line graph drawing results.
Cite as

Henry Förster, Stephen Kobourov, Jacob Miller, and Johannes Zink. Drawing Trees and Cacti with Integer Edge Lengths on a Polynomial-Size Grid (Poster Abstract). In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 48:1-48:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{forster_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.48,
  author =	{F\"{o}rster, Henry and Kobourov, Stephen and Miller, Jacob and Zink, Johannes},
  title =	{{Drawing Trees and Cacti with Integer Edge Lengths on a Polynomial-Size Grid}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{48:1--48:4},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.48},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250349},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.48},
  annote =	{Keywords: Harborth’s conjecture, tree drawings, cactus drawings, grid drawings}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2024.21
The Perception of Stress in Graph Drawings

Authors: Gavin J. Mooney, Helen C. Purchase, Michael Wybrow, Stephen G. Kobourov, and Jacob Miller

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 320, 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024)

Abstract
Most of the common graph layout principles (a.k.a. "aesthetics") on which many graph drawing algorithms are based are easy to define and to perceive. For example, the number of pairs of edges that cross each other, how symmetric a drawing looks, the aspect ratio of the bounding box, or the angular resolution at the nodes. The extent to which a graph drawing conforms to these principles can be determined by looking at how it is drawn - that is, by looking at the marks on the page - without consideration for the underlying structure of the graph. A key layout principle is that of optimising "stress", the basis for many algorithms such as the popular Kamada & Kawai algorithm and several force-directed algorithms. The stress of a graph drawing is, loosely speaking, the extent to which the geometric distance between each pair of nodes is proportional to the shortest path between them - over the whole graph drawing. The definition of stress therefore relies on the underlying structure of the graph (the "paths") in a way that other layout principles do not, making stress difficult to describe to novices unfamiliar with graph drawing principles, and, we believe, difficult to perceive. We conducted an experiment to see whether people (novices as well as experts) can see stress in graph drawings, and found that it is possible to train novices to "see" stress - even if their perception strategies are not based on the definitional concepts.
Cite as

Gavin J. Mooney, Helen C. Purchase, Michael Wybrow, Stephen G. Kobourov, and Jacob Miller. The Perception of Stress in Graph Drawings. In 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 320, pp. 21:1-21:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mooney_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2024.21,
  author =	{Mooney, Gavin J. and Purchase, Helen C. and Wybrow, Michael and Kobourov, Stephen G. and Miller, Jacob},
  title =	{{The Perception of Stress in Graph Drawings}},
  booktitle =	{32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-343-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{320},
  editor =	{Felsner, Stefan and Klein, Karsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2024.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-213051},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2024.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Stress, Graph Drawing, Visual Perception}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagRep.13.1.216
Perception in Network Visualization (Dagstuhl Seminar 23051)

Authors: Karsten Klein, Stephen Kobourov, Bernice E. Rogowitz, Danielle Szafir, and Jacob Miller

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 13, Issue 1 (2023)

Abstract
Networks are used to model and represent data in many application areas from life sciences to social sciences. Visual network analysis is a crucial tool to improve the understanding of data sets and processes over many levels of complexity, such as different semantic, spatial and temporal granularities. While there is a great deal of work on the algorithmic aspects of network visualization and the computational complexity of the underlying problems, the role and limits of human perception are rarely explicitly investigated and taken into account when designing network visualizations. To address this issue, this Dagstuhl Seminar raised awareness in the network visualization community of the need for more extensive theoretical and empirical understanding of how people perceive and make sense of network visualizations and the significant potential for improving current solutions when perception-based strategies are employed. Likewise, the seminar increased awareness in the perception community that challenges in network research can drive new questions for perception research, for example, in identifying features and patterns in large, often time-varying networks. We brought together researchers from several different communities to initiate a dialogue, foster exchange, discuss the state of the art at this intersection and within the respective fields, identify promising research questions and directions, and start working on selected problems.
Cite as

Karsten Klein, Stephen Kobourov, Bernice E. Rogowitz, Danielle Szafir, and Jacob Miller. Perception in Network Visualization (Dagstuhl Seminar 23051). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp. 216-244, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{klein_et_al:DagRep.13.1.216,
  author =	{Klein, Karsten and Kobourov, Stephen and Rogowitz, Bernice E. and Szafir, Danielle and Miller, Jacob},
  title =	{{Perception in Network Visualization (Dagstuhl Seminar 23051)}},
  pages =	{216--244},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{13},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Klein, Karsten and Kobourov, Stephen and Rogowitz, Bernice E. and Szafir, Danielle and Miller, Jacob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.13.1.216},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-191220},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.13.1.216},
  annote =	{Keywords: Network Visualization, Graph Drawing, Perception, Cognition}
}
Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact