Search Results

Documents authored by Zablotchi, Igor

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.28
Byzantine Consensus in the Random Asynchronous Model

Authors: George Danezis, Jovan Komatovic, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, and Igor Zablotchi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
We propose a novel relaxation of the classic asynchronous network model, called the random asynchronous model, which removes adversarial message scheduling while preserving unbounded message delays and Byzantine faults. Instead of an adversary dictating message order, delivery follows a random schedule. We analyze Byzantine consensus at different resilience thresholds (n = 3f+1, n = 2f+1, and n = f+2) and show that our relaxation allows consensus with probabilistic guarantees which are impossible in the standard asynchronous model or even the partially synchronous model. We complement these protocols with corresponding impossibility results, establishing the limits of consensus in the random asynchronous model.
Cite as

George Danezis, Jovan Komatovic, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, and Igor Zablotchi. Byzantine Consensus in the Random Asynchronous Model. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 28:1-28:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{danezis_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.28,
  author =	{Danezis, George and Komatovic, Jovan and Kokoris-Kogias, Lefteris and Sonnino, Alberto and Zablotchi, Igor},
  title =	{{Byzantine Consensus in the Random Asynchronous Model}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248457},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: network model, asynchronous, random scheduler, Byzantine consensus}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2024.14
Efficient Signature-Free Validated Agreement

Authors: Pierre Civit, Muhammad Ayaz Dzulfikar, Seth Gilbert, Rachid Guerraoui, Jovan Komatovic, Manuel Vidigueira, and Igor Zablotchi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 319, 38th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2024)

Abstract
Byzantine agreement enables n processes to agree on a common L-bit value, despite up to t > 0 arbitrary failures. A long line of work has been dedicated to improving the bit complexity of Byzantine agreement in synchrony. This has culminated in COOL, an error-free (deterministically secure against a computationally unbounded adversary) solution that achieves O(nL + n² log n) worst-case bit complexity (which is optimal for L ≥ n log n according to the Dolev-Reischuk lower bound). COOL satisfies strong unanimity: if all correct processes propose the same value, only that value can be decided. Whenever correct processes do not agree a priori (there is no unanimity), they may decide a default value ⊥ from COOL. Strong unanimity is, however, not sufficient for today’s state machine replication (SMR) and blockchain protocols. These systems value progress and require a decided value to always be valid (according to a predetermined predicate), excluding default decisions (such as ⊥) even in cases where there is no unanimity a priori. Validated Byzantine agreement satisfies this property (called external validity). Yet, the best error-free (or even signature-free) validated agreement solutions achieve only O(n²L) bit complexity, a far cry from the Ω(nL+n²) Dolev-Reischuk lower bound. Is it possible to bridge this complexity gap? We answer the question affirmatively. Namely, we present two new synchronous algorithms for validated Byzantine agreement, HashExt and ErrorFreeExt, with different trade-offs. Both algorithms are (1) signature-free, (2) optimally resilient (tolerate up to t < n / 3 failures), and (3) early-stopping (terminate in O(f+1) rounds, where f ≤ t denotes the actual number of failures). On the one hand, HashExt uses only hashes and achieves O(nL + n³κ) bit complexity, which is optimal for L ≥ n²κ (where κ is the size of a hash). On the other hand, ErrorFreeExt is error-free, using no cryptography whatsoever, and achieves O((nL + n²)log n) bit complexity, which is near-optimal for any L.
Cite as

Pierre Civit, Muhammad Ayaz Dzulfikar, Seth Gilbert, Rachid Guerraoui, Jovan Komatovic, Manuel Vidigueira, and Igor Zablotchi. Efficient Signature-Free Validated Agreement. In 38th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 319, pp. 14:1-14:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{civit_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2024.14,
  author =	{Civit, Pierre and Dzulfikar, Muhammad Ayaz and Gilbert, Seth and Guerraoui, Rachid and Komatovic, Jovan and Vidigueira, Manuel and Zablotchi, Igor},
  title =	{{Efficient Signature-Free Validated Agreement}},
  booktitle =	{38th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2024)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-352-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{319},
  editor =	{Alistarh, Dan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2024.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-212408},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2024.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: Validated Byzantine agreement, Bit complexity, Round complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2021.3
Frugal Byzantine Computing

Authors: Marcos K. Aguilera, Naama Ben-David, Rachid Guerraoui, Dalia Papuc, Athanasios Xygkis, and Igor Zablotchi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 209, 35th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2021)

Abstract
Traditional techniques for handling Byzantine failures are expensive: digital signatures are too costly, while using 3f+1 replicas is uneconomical (f denotes the maximum number of Byzantine processes). We seek algorithms that reduce the number of replicas to 2f+1 and minimize the number of signatures. While the first goal can be achieved in the message-and-memory model, accomplishing the second goal simultaneously is challenging. We first address this challenge for the problem of broadcasting messages reliably. We study two variants of this problem, Consistent Broadcast and Reliable Broadcast, typically considered very close. Perhaps surprisingly, we establish a separation between them in terms of signatures required. In particular, we show that Consistent Broadcast requires at least 1 signature in some execution, while Reliable Broadcast requires O(n) signatures in some execution. We present matching upper bounds for both primitives within constant factors. We then turn to the problem of consensus and argue that this separation matters for solving consensus with Byzantine failures: we present a practical consensus algorithm that uses Consistent Broadcast as its main communication primitive. This algorithm works for n = 2f+1 and avoids signatures in the common case - properties that have not been simultaneously achieved previously. Overall, our work approaches Byzantine computing in a frugal manner and motivates the use of Consistent Broadcast - rather than Reliable Broadcast - as a key primitive for reaching agreement.
Cite as

Marcos K. Aguilera, Naama Ben-David, Rachid Guerraoui, Dalia Papuc, Athanasios Xygkis, and Igor Zablotchi. Frugal Byzantine Computing. In 35th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 209, pp. 3:1-3:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{aguilera_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2021.3,
  author =	{Aguilera, Marcos K. and Ben-David, Naama and Guerraoui, Rachid and Papuc, Dalia and Xygkis, Athanasios and Zablotchi, Igor},
  title =	{{Frugal Byzantine Computing}},
  booktitle =	{35th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2021)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-210-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{209},
  editor =	{Gilbert, Seth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2021.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-148051},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2021.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Reliable Broadcast, Consistent Broadcast, Consensus, Byzantine Failure, Message-and-memory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2020.4
Efficient Multi-Word Compare and Swap

Authors: Rachid Guerraoui, Alex Kogan, Virendra J. Marathe, and Igor Zablotchi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 179, 34th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2020)

Abstract
Atomic lock-free multi-word compare-and-swap (MCAS) is a powerful tool for designing concurrent algorithms. Yet, its widespread usage has been limited because lock-free implementations of MCAS make heavy use of expensive compare-and-swap (CAS) instructions. Existing MCAS implementations indeed use at least 2k+1 CASes per k-CAS. This leads to the natural desire to minimize the number of CASes required to implement MCAS. We first prove in this paper that it is impossible to "pack" the information required to perform a k-word CAS (k-CAS) in less than k locations to be CASed. Then we present the first algorithm that requires k+1 CASes per call to k-CAS in the common uncontended case. We implement our algorithm and show that it outperforms a state-of-the-art baseline in a variety of benchmarks in most considered workloads. We also present a durably linearizable (persistent memory friendly) version of our MCAS algorithm using only 2 persistence fences per call, while still only requiring k+1 CASes per k-CAS.
Cite as

Rachid Guerraoui, Alex Kogan, Virendra J. Marathe, and Igor Zablotchi. Efficient Multi-Word Compare and Swap. In 34th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 179, pp. 4:1-4:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{guerraoui_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2020.4,
  author =	{Guerraoui, Rachid and Kogan, Alex and Marathe, Virendra J. and Zablotchi, Igor},
  title =	{{Efficient Multi-Word Compare and Swap}},
  booktitle =	{34th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2020)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-168-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{179},
  editor =	{Attiya, Hagit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2020.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-130827},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2020.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: lock-free, multi-word compare-and-swap, persistent memory}
}
Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact