Search Results

Documents authored by van der Hoek, Wiebe

Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.09121.27
Robust Normative Systems

Authors: Thomas Agotnes, Wiebe van der Hoek, and Michael Wooldridge

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9121, Normative Multi-Agent Systems (2009)

Abstract
Although normative systems, or social laws, have proved to be a highly influential approach to coordination in multi-agent systems, the issue of emph{compliance} to such normative systems remains problematic. In all real systems, it is possible that some members of an agent population will not comply with the rules of a normative system, even if it is in their interests to do so. It is therefore important to consider the extent to which a normative system is emph{robust}, i.e., the extent to which it remains effective even if some agents do not comply with it. We formalise and investigate three different notions of robustness and related decision problems. We begin by considering sets of agents whose compliance is necessary and/or sufficient to guarantee the effectiveness of a normative system; we then consider quantitative approaches to robustness, where we try to identify the proportion of an agent population that must comply in order to ensure success, and finally, we consider a more general approach, where we characterise the compliance conditions required for success as a logical formula.
Cite as

Thomas Agotnes, Wiebe van der Hoek, and Michael Wooldridge. Robust Normative Systems. In Normative Multi-Agent Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9121, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{agotnes_et_al:DagSemProc.09121.27,
  author =	{Agotnes, Thomas and van der Hoek, Wiebe and Wooldridge, Michael},
  title =	{{Robust Normative Systems}},
  booktitle =	{Normative Multi-Agent Systems},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{9121},
  editor =	{Guido Boella and Pablo Noriega and Gabriella Pigozzi and Harko Verhagen},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.09121.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-18971},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.09121.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Normative systems, robustness, fault tolerance, complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.08361.7
GOAL Agents Instantiate Intention Logic

Authors: Koen Hindriks and Wiebe van der Hoek

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8361, Programming Multi-Agent Systems (2008)

Abstract
It is commonly believed there is a big gap between agent logics and computational agent frameworks. In this paper, we show that this gap is not as big as believed by showing that GOAL agents instantiate Intention Logic of Cohen and Levesque. That is, we show that GOAL agent programs can be formally related to Intention Logic.We do so by proving that the GOAL Verification Logic can be embedded into Intention Logic. It follows that (a fragment of) Intention Logic can be used to prove properties of GOAL agents. The work reported is an important step towards the application of standard tools from modal logic for e.g. model checking agent programs. Our results also prove useful for extending the expressiveness of the GOAL agent language. This is illustrated by incorporating temporally extended goals into GOAL agents.
Cite as

Koen Hindriks and Wiebe van der Hoek. GOAL Agents Instantiate Intention Logic. In Programming Multi-Agent Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8361, pp. 1-13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hindriks_et_al:DagSemProc.08361.7,
  author =	{Hindriks, Koen and van der Hoek, Wiebe},
  title =	{{GOAL Agents Instantiate Intention Logic}},
  booktitle =	{Programming Multi-Agent Systems},
  pages =	{1--13},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{8361},
  editor =	{Rafael Bordini and Mehdi Dastani and J\"{u}rgen Dix and Amal El Fallah-Seghrouchni},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08361.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-16458},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08361.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Agents, programs, constructs, logics, operational semantics, model-theoretic semantics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.07122.24
On the Logic of Normative Systems

Authors: Thomas Ågotnes, Wiebe van der Hoek, Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, Carles Sierra, and Michael Wooldridge

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7122, Normative Multi-agent Systems (2007)

Abstract
We introduce emph{Normative Temporal Logic} (acro{ntl}), a logic for reasoning about normative systems. acro{ntl} is a generalisation of the well-known branching-time temporal logic acro{ctl}, in which the path quantifiers $Apath$ (``on all pathsldots'') and $Epath$ (``on some pathldots'') are replaced by the indexed deontic operators $O{ s}$ and $P{ s}$, where for example $O{ s}phi$ means ``$phi$ is obligatory in the context of normative system $ s$''. After defining the logic, we give a sound and complete axiomatisation, and discuss the logic's relationship to standard deontic logics. We present a symbolic representation language for models and normative systems, and identify four different model checking problems, corresponding to whether or not a model is represented symbolically or explicitly, and whether or not we are given an interpretation for the normative systems named in formulae to be checked. We show that the complexity of model checking varies from acro{p}-complete up to acro{exptime}-hard for these variations.
Cite as

Thomas Ågotnes, Wiebe van der Hoek, Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, Carles Sierra, and Michael Wooldridge. On the Logic of Normative Systems. In Normative Multi-agent Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7122, pp. 1-13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2007)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{agotnes_et_al:DagSemProc.07122.24,
  author =	{\r{A}gotnes, Thomas and van der Hoek, Wiebe and Rodriguez-Aguilar, Juan A. and Sierra, Carles and Wooldridge, Michael},
  title =	{{On the Logic of Normative Systems}},
  booktitle =	{Normative Multi-agent Systems},
  pages =	{1--13},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2007},
  volume =	{7122},
  editor =	{Guido Boella and Leon van der Torre and Harko Verhagen},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07122.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-9210},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.07122.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Normative systems, normative temporal logic, deontic logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemRep.331
The Logic of Rational Agency (Dagstuhl Seminar 02041)

Authors: Wiebe van der Hoek and Michael J. Wooldridge

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Reports. Dagstuhl Seminar Reports, Volume 1 (2021)

Abstract
Cite as

Wiebe van der Hoek and Michael J. Wooldridge. The Logic of Rational Agency (Dagstuhl Seminar 02041). Dagstuhl Seminar Report 331, pp. 1-11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2003)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@TechReport{vanderhoek_et_al:DagSemRep.331,
  author =	{van der Hoek, Wiebe and Wooldridge, Michael J.},
  title =	{{The Logic of Rational Agency (Dagstuhl Seminar 02041)}},
  pages =	{1--11},
  ISSN =	{1619-0203},
  year =	{2003},
  type = 	{Dagstuhl Seminar Report},
  number =	{331},
  institution =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemRep.331},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-152140},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemRep.331},
}
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact