5 Search Results for "Asahiro, Yuichi"


Document
The Communication Complexity of Combinatorial Auctions in Graphs

Authors: George Christodoulou, Elias Koutsoupias, Annamária Kovács, and Ioannis Vlachos

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)


Abstract
We study truthful and non-truthful protocols for combinatorial auctions in which every item can be allocated to one of two agents (multigraphs), or more generally to a fixed number of agents (hypergraphs). We show some tight - both positive and impossibility - results for the communication complexity of approximating the optimal social welfare for general monotone, subadditive, or XOS valuations.

Cite as

George Christodoulou, Elias Koutsoupias, Annamária Kovács, and Ioannis Vlachos. The Communication Complexity of Combinatorial Auctions in Graphs. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 27:1-27:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{christodoulou_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.27,
  author =	{Christodoulou, George and Koutsoupias, Elias and Kov\'{a}cs, Annam\'{a}ria and Vlachos, Ioannis},
  title =	{{The Communication Complexity of Combinatorial Auctions in Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255163},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Auctions, Communication Complexity, Mechanism Design, Graphs}
}
Document
Approximability of Longest Run Subsequence and Complementary Minimization Problems

Authors: Yuichi Asahiro, Mingyang Gong, Jesper Jansson, Guohui Lin, Sichen Lu, Eiji Miyano, Hirotaka Ono, Toshiki Saitoh, and Shunichi Tanaka

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 344, 25th International Conference on Algorithms for Bioinformatics (WABI 2025)


Abstract
We study the polynomial-time approximability of the Longest Run Subsequence problem (LRS for short) and its complementary minimization variant Minimum Run Subsequence Deletion problem (MRSD for short). For a string S = s₁ ⋯ s_n over an alphabet Σ, a subsequence S' of S is S' = s_{i₁} ⋯ s_{i_p}, such that 1 ≤ i₁ < i₂ < … < i_p ≤ |S|. A run of a symbol σ ∈ Σ in S is a maximal substring of consecutive occurrences of σ. A run subsequence S' of S is a subsequence of S in which every symbol σ ∈ Σ occurs in at most one run. The co-subsequence ̅{S'} of the subsequence S' = s_{i₁} ⋯ s_{i_p} in S is the subsequence obtained by deleting all the characters in S' from S, i.e., ̅{S'} = s_{j₁} ⋯ s_{j_{n-p}} such that j₁ < j₂ < … < j_{n-p} and {j₁, …, j_{n-p}} = {1, …, n}⧵ {i₁, …, i_p}. Given a string S, the goal of LRS (resp., MRSD) is to find a run subsequence S^* of S such that the length |S^*| is maximized (resp., the number | ̅{S^*}| of deleted symbols from S is minimized) over all the run subsequences of S. Let k be the maximum number of symbol occurrences in the input S. It is known that LRS and MRSD are APX-hard even if k = 2. In this paper, we show that LRS can be approximated in polynomial time within factors of (k+2)/3 for k = 2 or 3, and 2(k+1)/5 for every k ≥ 4. Furthermore, we show that MRSD can be approximated in linear time within a factor of (k+4)/4 if k is even and (k+3)/4 if k is odd.

Cite as

Yuichi Asahiro, Mingyang Gong, Jesper Jansson, Guohui Lin, Sichen Lu, Eiji Miyano, Hirotaka Ono, Toshiki Saitoh, and Shunichi Tanaka. Approximability of Longest Run Subsequence and Complementary Minimization Problems. In 25th International Conference on Algorithms for Bioinformatics (WABI 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 344, pp. 3:1-3:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{asahiro_et_al:LIPIcs.WABI.2025.3,
  author =	{Asahiro, Yuichi and Gong, Mingyang and Jansson, Jesper and Lin, Guohui and Lu, Sichen and Miyano, Eiji and Ono, Hirotaka and Saitoh, Toshiki and Tanaka, Shunichi},
  title =	{{Approximability of Longest Run Subsequence and Complementary Minimization Problems}},
  booktitle =	{25th International Conference on Algorithms for Bioinformatics (WABI 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-386-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{344},
  editor =	{Brejov\'{a}, Bro\v{n}a and Patro, Rob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WABI.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239290},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.WABI.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Longest run subsequence, minimum run subsequence deletion, approximation algorithm}
}
Document
Representing Paths in Digraphs

Authors: Riccardo Dondi and Alexandru Popa

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 331, 36th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2025)


Abstract
In this contribution we consider two combinatorial problems related to graph string matching, motivated by recent approaches in computational genomics. Given a DAG where each node is labeled by a symbol, the problems aim to find a path in the DAG whose nodes contain all (or the maximum number of) symbols of the alphabet. We introduce a decision problem, Σ-Representing Path, that asks whether there exists a path that contains all the symbols of the alphabet, and an optimization problem, called Maximum Representing Path, that asks for a path that contains the maximum number of symbols. We analyze the complexity of the problems, showing the NP-completeness of {Σ-Representing Path} when each symbol labels at most three nodes in the DAG, and showing the APX-hardness of Maximum Representing Path when each symbol labels at most two nodes in the DAG. We complement the first result by giving a polynomial-time algorithm for Σ-Representing Path when each symbol labels at most two nodes in the DAG. Then we investigate the parameterized complexity of the two problems when the DAG has a limited distance from a set of disjoint paths and we show that both problems are W[1]-hard for this parameter. We consider the approximation of Maximum Representing Path, giving an approximation algorithm of factor √OPT, where OPT is the value of an optimal solution of the problem. We also show that Maximum Representing Path cannot be approximated within factor e/(e-1) - α, for any constant α > 0, unless NP ⊆ DTIME(|V|^{O(log log |V|)}) (V is the set of nodes of the DAG).

Cite as

Riccardo Dondi and Alexandru Popa. Representing Paths in Digraphs. In 36th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 331, pp. 1:1-1:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dondi_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2025.1,
  author =	{Dondi, Riccardo and Popa, Alexandru},
  title =	{{Representing Paths in Digraphs}},
  booktitle =	{36th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2025)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-369-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{331},
  editor =	{Bonizzoni, Paola and M\"{a}kinen, Veli},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2025.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-230954},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2025.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph String Matching, Computational Complexity, Parameterized Complexity, Algorithms}
}
Document
Approximation Algorithms for the Longest Run Subsequence Problem

Authors: Yuichi Asahiro, Hiroshi Eto, Mingyang Gong, Jesper Jansson, Guohui Lin, Eiji Miyano, Hirotaka Ono, and Shunichi Tanaka

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 259, 34th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2023)


Abstract
We study the approximability of the Longest Run Subsequence problem (LRS for short). For a string S = s_1 ⋯ s_n over an alphabet Σ, a run of a symbol σ ∈ Σ in S is a maximal substring of consecutive occurrences of σ. A run subsequence S' of S is a sequence in which every symbol σ ∈ Σ occurs in at most one run. Given a string S, the goal of LRS is to find a longest run subsequence S^* of S such that the length |S^*| is maximized over all the run subsequences of S. It is known that LRS is APX-hard even if each symbol has at most two occurrences in the input string, and that LRS admits a polynomial-time k-approximation algorithm if the number of occurrences of every symbol in the input string is bounded by k. In this paper, we design a polynomial-time (k+1)/2-approximation algorithm for LRS under the k-occurrence constraint on input strings. For the case k = 2, we further improve the approximation ratio from 3/2 to 4/3.

Cite as

Yuichi Asahiro, Hiroshi Eto, Mingyang Gong, Jesper Jansson, Guohui Lin, Eiji Miyano, Hirotaka Ono, and Shunichi Tanaka. Approximation Algorithms for the Longest Run Subsequence Problem. In 34th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 259, pp. 2:1-2:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{asahiro_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2023.2,
  author =	{Asahiro, Yuichi and Eto, Hiroshi and Gong, Mingyang and Jansson, Jesper and Lin, Guohui and Miyano, Eiji and Ono, Hirotaka and Tanaka, Shunichi},
  title =	{{Approximation Algorithms for the Longest Run Subsequence Problem}},
  booktitle =	{34th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2023)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-276-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{259},
  editor =	{Bulteau, Laurent and Lipt\'{a}k, Zsuzsanna},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2023.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-179560},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2023.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Longest run subsequence problem, bounded occurrence, approximation algorithm}
}
Document
Polynomial-Time Equivalences and Refined Algorithms for Longest Common Subsequence Variants

Authors: Yuichi Asahiro, Jesper Jansson, Guohui Lin, Eiji Miyano, Hirotaka Ono, and Tadatoshi Utashima

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 223, 33rd Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2022)


Abstract
The problem of computing the longest common subsequence of two sequences (LCS for short) is a classical and fundamental problem in computer science. In this paper, we study four variants of LCS: the Repetition-Bounded Longest Common Subsequence problem (RBLCS) [Yuichi Asahiro et al., 2020], the Multiset-Restricted Common Subsequence problem (MRCS) [Radu Stefan Mincu and Alexandru Popa, 2018], the Two-Side-Filled Longest Common Subsequence problem (2FLCS), and the One-Side-Filled Longest Common Subsequence problem (1FLCS) [Mauro Castelli et al., 2017; Mauro Castelli et al., 2019]. Although the original LCS can be solved in polynomial time, all these four variants are known to be NP-hard. Recently, an exact, O(1.44225ⁿ)-time, dynamic programming (DP)-based algorithm for RBLCS was proposed [Yuichi Asahiro et al., 2020], where the two input sequences have lengths n and poly(n). We first establish that each of MRCS, 1FLCS, and 2FLCS is polynomially equivalent to RBLCS. Then, we design a refined DP-based algorithm for RBLCS that runs in O(1.41422ⁿ) time, which implies that MRCS, 1FLCS, and 2FLCS can also be solved in O(1.41422ⁿ) time. Finally, we give a polynomial-time 2-approximation algorithm for 2FLCS.

Cite as

Yuichi Asahiro, Jesper Jansson, Guohui Lin, Eiji Miyano, Hirotaka Ono, and Tadatoshi Utashima. Polynomial-Time Equivalences and Refined Algorithms for Longest Common Subsequence Variants. In 33rd Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 223, pp. 15:1-15:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{asahiro_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2022.15,
  author =	{Asahiro, Yuichi and Jansson, Jesper and Lin, Guohui and Miyano, Eiji and Ono, Hirotaka and Utashima, Tadatoshi},
  title =	{{Polynomial-Time Equivalences and Refined Algorithms for Longest Common Subsequence Variants}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2022)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-234-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{223},
  editor =	{Bannai, Hideo and Holub, Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2022.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-161424},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2022.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: Repetition-bounded longest common subsequence problem, multiset restricted longest common subsequence problem, one-side-filled longest common subsequence problem, two-side-filled longest common subsequence problem, exact algorithms, and approximation algorithms}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 5 Document/PDF
  • 3 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 2 2025
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2022

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Asahiro, Yuichi
  • 3 Jansson, Jesper
  • 3 Lin, Guohui
  • 3 Miyano, Eiji
  • 3 Ono, Hirotaka
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 5 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 4 Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms
  • 1 Theory of computation → Algorithmic mechanism design
  • 1 Theory of computation → Communication complexity
  • 1 Theory of computation → Computational pricing and auctions
  • 1 Theory of computation → Graph algorithms analysis
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 approximation algorithm
  • 1 Algorithms
  • 1 Auctions
  • 1 Communication Complexity
  • 1 Computational Complexity
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail