9 Search Results for "Bonelli, Eduardo"

Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.1
Meaningfulness and Genericity in a Subsuming Framework (Invited Talk)

Authors: Delia Kesner, Victor Arrial, and Giulio Guerrieri

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 299, 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)

Abstract
This paper studies the notion of meaningfulness for a unifying framework called dBang-calculus, which subsumes both call-by-name (dCBN) and call-by-value (dCBV). We first define meaningfulness in dBang and then characterize it by means of typability and inhabitation in an associated non-idempotent intersection type system previously appearing in the literature. We validate the proposed notion of meaningfulness by showing two properties: (1) consistency of the smallest theory, called ℋ, equating all meaningless terms, and (2) genericity, stating that meaningless subterms have no bearing on the significance of meaningful terms. The theory ℋ is also shown to have a unique consistent and maximal extension ℋ*, which coincides with a well-known notion of observational equivalence. Last but not least, we show that the notions of meaningfulness and genericity in the literature for dCBN and dCBV are subsumed by the corresponding ones proposed here for the dBang-calculus.
Cite as

Delia Kesner, Victor Arrial, and Giulio Guerrieri. Meaningfulness and Genericity in a Subsuming Framework (Invited Talk). In 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 299, pp. 1:1-1:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kesner_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.1,
  author =	{Kesner, Delia and Arrial, Victor and Guerrieri, Giulio},
  title =	{{Meaningfulness and Genericity in a Subsuming Framework}},
  booktitle =	{9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-323-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{299},
  editor =	{Rehof, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-203305},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda calculus, Solvability, Meaningfulness, Inhabitation, Genericity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.23
Mirroring Call-By-Need, or Values Acting Silly

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli and Adrienne Lancelot

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 299, 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)

Abstract
Call-by-need evaluation for the λ-calculus can be seen as merging the best of call-by-name and call-by-value, namely the wise erasing behaviour of the former and the wise duplicating behaviour of the latter. To better understand how duplication and erasure can be combined, we design a degenerated calculus, dubbed call-by-silly, that is symmetric to call-by-need in that it merges the worst of call-by-name and call-by-value, namely silly duplications by-name and silly erasures by-value. We validate the design of the call-by-silly calculus via rewriting properties and multi types. In particular, we mirror the main theorem about call-by-need - that is, its operational equivalence with call-by-name - showing that call-by-silly and call-by-value induce the same contextual equivalence. This fact shows the blindness with respect to efficiency of call-by-value contextual equivalence. We also define a call-by-silly strategy and measure its length via tight multi types. Lastly, we prove that the call-by-silly strategy computes evaluation sequences of maximal length in the calculus.
Cite as

Beniamino Accattoli and Adrienne Lancelot. Mirroring Call-By-Need, or Values Acting Silly. In 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 299, pp. 23:1-23:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{accattoli_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.23,
  author =	{Accattoli, Beniamino and Lancelot, Adrienne},
  title =	{{Mirroring Call-By-Need, or Values Acting Silly}},
  booktitle =	{9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-323-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{299},
  editor =	{Rehof, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-203527},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda calculus, intersection types, call-by-value, call-by-need}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.24
IMELL Cut Elimination with Linear Overhead

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli and Claudio Sacerdoti Coen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 299, 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)

Abstract
Recently, Accattoli introduced the Exponential Substitution Calculus (ESC) given by untyped proof terms for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (IMELL), endowed with rewriting rules at-a-distance for cut elimination. He also introduced a new cut elimination strategy, dubbed the good strategy, and showed that its number of steps is a time cost model with polynomial overhead for ESC/IMELL, and the first such one. Here, we refine Accattoli’s result by introducing an abstract machine for ESC and proving that it implements the good strategy and computes cut-free terms/proofs within a linear overhead.
Cite as

Beniamino Accattoli and Claudio Sacerdoti Coen. IMELL Cut Elimination with Linear Overhead. In 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 299, pp. 24:1-24:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{accattoli_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.24,
  author =	{Accattoli, Beniamino and Sacerdoti Coen, Claudio},
  title =	{{IMELL Cut Elimination with Linear Overhead}},
  booktitle =	{9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-323-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{299},
  editor =	{Rehof, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-203539},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda calculus, linear logic, abstract machines}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.11
Two Decreasing Measures for Simply Typed λ-Terms

Authors: Pablo Barenbaum and Cristian Sottile

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 260, 8th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2023)

Abstract
This paper defines two decreasing measures for terms of the simply typed λ-calculus, called the 𝒲-measure and the 𝒯^{𝐦}-measure. A decreasing measure is a function that maps each typable λ-term to an element of a well-founded ordering, in such a way that contracting any β-redex decreases the value of the function, entailing strong normalization. Both measures are defined constructively, relying on an auxiliary calculus, a non-erasing variant of the λ-calculus. In this system, dubbed the λ^{𝐦}-calculus, each β-step creates a "wrapper" containing a copy of the argument that cannot be erased and cannot interact with the context in any other way. Both measures rely crucially on the observation, known to Turing and Prawitz, that contracting a redex cannot create redexes of higher degree, where the degree of a redex is defined as the height of the type of its λ-abstraction. The 𝒲-measure maps each λ-term to a natural number, and it is obtained by evaluating the term in the λ^{𝐦}-calculus and counting the number of remaining wrappers. The 𝒯^{𝐦}-measure maps each λ-term to a structure of nested multisets, where the nesting depth is proportional to the maximum redex degree.
Cite as

Pablo Barenbaum and Cristian Sottile. Two Decreasing Measures for Simply Typed λ-Terms. In 8th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 260, pp. 11:1-11:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{barenbaum_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.11,
  author =	{Barenbaum, Pablo and Sottile, Cristian},
  title =	{{Two Decreasing Measures for Simply Typed \lambda-Terms}},
  booktitle =	{8th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2023)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-277-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{260},
  editor =	{Gaboardi, Marco and van Raamsdonk, Femke},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-179956},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda Calculus, Rewriting, Termination, Strong Normalization, Simple Types}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2023.8
Reductions in Higher-Order Rewriting and Their Equivalence

Authors: Pablo Barenbaum and Eduardo Bonelli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 252, 31st EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2023)

Abstract
Proof terms are syntactic expressions that represent computations in term rewriting. They were introduced by Meseguer and exploited by van Oostrom and de Vrijer to study equivalence of reductions in (left-linear) first-order term rewriting systems. We study the problem of extending the notion of proof term to higher-order rewriting, which generalizes the first-order setting by allowing terms with binders and higher-order substitution. In previous works that devise proof terms for higher-order rewriting, such as Bruggink’s, it has been noted that the challenge lies in reconciling composition of proof terms and higher-order substitution (β-equivalence). This led Bruggink to reject "nested" composition, other than at the outermost level. In this paper, we propose a notion of higher-order proof term we dub rewrites that supports nested composition. We then define two notions of equivalence on rewrites, namely permutation equivalence and projection equivalence, and show that they coincide.
Cite as

Pablo Barenbaum and Eduardo Bonelli. Reductions in Higher-Order Rewriting and Their Equivalence. In 31st EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 252, pp. 8:1-8:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{barenbaum_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2023.8,
  author =	{Barenbaum, Pablo and Bonelli, Eduardo},
  title =	{{Reductions in Higher-Order Rewriting and Their Equivalence}},
  booktitle =	{31st EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2023)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-264-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{252},
  editor =	{Klin, Bartek and Pimentel, Elaine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2023.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-174694},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2023.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Term Rewriting, Higher-Order Rewriting, Proof terms, Equivalence of Computations}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2020.4
Strong Bisimulation for Control Operators (Invited Talk)

Authors: Delia Kesner, Eduardo Bonelli, and Andrés Viso

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 152, 28th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2020)

Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to identify programs with control operators whose reduction semantics are in exact correspondence. This is achieved by introducing a relation ≃, defined over a revised presentation of Parigot’s λμ-calculus we dub ΛM. Our result builds on two fundamental ingredients: (1) factorization of λμ-reduction into multiplicative and exponential steps by means of explicit term operators of ΛM, and (2) translation of ΛM-terms into Laurent’s polarized proof-nets (PPN) such that cut-elimination in PPN simulates our calculus. Our proposed relation ≃ is shown to characterize structural equivalence in PPN. Most notably, ≃ is shown to be a strong bisimulation with respect to reduction in ΛM, i.e. two ≃-equivalent terms have the exact same reduction semantics, a result which fails for Regnier’s σ-equivalence in λ-calculus as well as for Laurent’s σ-equivalence in λμ.
Cite as

Delia Kesner, Eduardo Bonelli, and Andrés Viso. Strong Bisimulation for Control Operators (Invited Talk). In 28th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 152, pp. 4:1-4:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kesner_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2020.4,
  author =	{Kesner, Delia and Bonelli, Eduardo and Viso, Andr\'{e}s},
  title =	{{Strong Bisimulation for Control Operators}},
  booktitle =	{28th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2020)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-132-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{152},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel and Muscholl, Anca},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2020.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-116473},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2020.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda-mu calculus, proof-nets, strong bisimulation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2015.6
Efficient Type Checking for Path Polymorphism

Authors: Juan Edi, Andrés Viso, and Eduardo Bonelli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 69, 21st International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2015) (2018)

Abstract
A type system combining type application, constants as types, union types (associative, commutative and idempotent) and recursive types has recently been proposed for statically typing path polymorphism, the ability to define functions that can operate uniformly over recursively specified applicative data structures. A typical pattern such functions resort to is \dataterm{x}{y} which decomposes a compound, in other words any applicative tree structure, into its parts. We study type-checking for this type system in two stages. First we propose algorithms for checking type equivalence and subtyping based on coinductive characterizations of those relations. We then formulate a syntax-directed presentation and prove its equivalence with the original one. This yields a type-checking algorithm which unfortunately has exponential time complexity in the worst case. A second algorithm is then proposed, based on automata techniques, which yields a polynomial-time type-checking algorithm.
Cite as

Juan Edi, Andrés Viso, and Eduardo Bonelli. Efficient Type Checking for Path Polymorphism. In 21st International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2015). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 69, pp. 6:1-6:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{edi_et_al:LIPIcs.TYPES.2015.6,
  author =	{Edi, Juan and Viso, Andr\'{e}s and Bonelli, Eduardo},
  title =	{{Efficient Type Checking for Path Polymorphism}},
  booktitle =	{21st International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2015)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-030-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{69},
  editor =	{Uustalu, Tarmo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2015.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-84761},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2015.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda-calculus, pattern matching, path polymorphism, type checking}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.9
Optimality and the Linear Substitution Calculus

Authors: Pablo Barenbaum and Eduardo Bonelli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 84, 2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017)

Abstract
We lift the theory of optimal reduction to a decomposition of the lambda calculus known as the Linear Substitution Calculus (LSC). LSC decomposes beta-reduction into finer steps that manipulate substitutions in two distinctive ways: it uses context rules that allow substitutions to act "at a distance" and rewrites modulo a set of equations that allow substitutions to "float" in a term. We propose a notion of redex family obtained by adapting Lévy labels to support these two distinctive features. This is followed by a proof of the finite family developments theorem (FFD). We then apply FFD to prove an optimal reduction theorem for LSC. We also apply FFD to deduce additional novel properties of LSC, namely an algorithm for standardisation by selection and normalisation of a linear call-by-need reduction strategy. All results are proved in the axiomatic setting of Glauert and Khashidashvili's Deterministic Residual Structures.
Cite as

Pablo Barenbaum and Eduardo Bonelli. Optimality and the Linear Substitution Calculus. In 2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 84, pp. 9:1-9:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{barenbaum_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.9,
  author =	{Barenbaum, Pablo and Bonelli, Eduardo},
  title =	{{Optimality and the Linear Substitution Calculus}},
  booktitle =	{2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-047-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{84},
  editor =	{Miller, Dale},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-77307},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Rewriting, Lambda Calculus, Explicit Substitutions, Optimal Reduction}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2012.117
Normalisation for Dynamic Pattern Calculi

Authors: Eduardo Bonelli, Delia Kesner, Carlos Lombardi, and Alejandro Rios

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 15, 23rd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA'12) (2012)

Abstract
The Pure Pattern Calculus (PPC) extends the lambda-calculus, as well as the family of algebraic pattern calculi, with first-class patterns; that is, patterns can be passed as arguments, evaluated and returned as results. The notion of matching failure of the PPC not only provides a mechanism to define functions by pattern matching on cases but also supplies PPC with parallel-or-like, non-sequential behaviour. Therefore, devising normalising strategies for PPC to obtain well-behaved implementations turns out to be challenging. This paper focuses on normalising reduction strategies for PPC. We define a (multistep) strategy and show that it is normalising. The strategy generalises the leftmost-outermost strategy for lambda-calculus and is strictly finer than parallel-outermost. The normalisation proof is based on the notion of necessary set of redexes, a generalisation of the notion of needed redex encompassing non-sequential reduction systems.
Cite as

Eduardo Bonelli, Delia Kesner, Carlos Lombardi, and Alejandro Rios. Normalisation for Dynamic Pattern Calculi. In 23rd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA'12). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 15, pp. 117-132, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2012)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bonelli_et_al:LIPIcs.RTA.2012.117,
  author =	{Bonelli, Eduardo and Kesner, Delia and Lombardi, Carlos and Rios, Alejandro},
  title =	{{Normalisation for Dynamic Pattern Calculi}},
  booktitle =	{23rd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA'12)},
  pages =	{117--132},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-38-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2012},
  volume =	{15},
  editor =	{Tiwari, Ashish},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2012.117},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-34889},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2012.117},
  annote =	{Keywords: Pattern calculi, reduction strategies, sequentiality, neededness}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 5 Bonelli, Eduardo
  • 3 Barenbaum, Pablo
  • 3 Kesner, Delia
  • 2 Accattoli, Beniamino
  • 2 Viso, Andrés
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Lambda calculus
  • 3 Theory of computation → Operational semantics
  • 2 Theory of computation → Equational logic and rewriting
  • 1 Theory of computation → Linear logic
  • 1 Theory of computation → Type theory

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Lambda calculus
  • 2 Lambda Calculus
  • 2 Rewriting
  • 1 Equivalence of Computations
  • 1 Explicit Substitutions
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 9 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2024
  • 2 2023
  • 1 2012
  • 1 2017
  • 1 2018
  • Show More...

© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact