5 Search Results for "Bruni, Roberto"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.8
Model Checking as Program Verification by Abstract Interpretation

Authors: Paolo Baldan, Roberto Bruni, Francesco Ranzato, and Diletta Rigo

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)

Abstract
Abstract interpretation offers a powerful toolset for static analysis, tackling precision, complexity and state-explosion issues. In the literature, state partitioning abstractions based on (bi)simulation and property-preserving state relations have been successfully applied to abstract model checking. Here, we pursue a different track in which model checking is seen as an instance of program verification. To this purpose, we introduce a suitable language - called MOKA (for MOdel checking as abstract interpretation of 𝖪leene 𝖠lgebras) - which is used to encode temporal formulae as programs. In particular, we show that (universal fragments of) temporal logics, such as ACTL or, more generally, universal μ-calculus can be transformed into MOKA programs. Such programs return all and only the initial states which violate the formula. By applying abstract interpretation to MOKA programs, we pave the way for reusing more general abstractions than partitions as well as for tuning the precision of the abstraction to remove or avoid false alarms. We show how to perform model checking via a program logic that combines under-approximation and abstract interpretation analysis to avoid false alarms. The notion of locally complete abstraction is used to dynamically improve the analysis precision via counterexample-guided domain refinement.
Cite as

Paolo Baldan, Roberto Bruni, Francesco Ranzato, and Diletta Rigo. Model Checking as Program Verification by Abstract Interpretation. In 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 348, pp. 8:1-8:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{baldan_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.8,
  author =	{Baldan, Paolo and Bruni, Roberto and Ranzato, Francesco and Rigo, Diletta},
  title =	{{Model Checking as Program Verification by Abstract Interpretation}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-389-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{348},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and van de Pol, Jaco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239583},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: ACTL, \mu-calculus, model checking, abstract interpretation, program analysis, local completeness, abstract interpretation repair, domain refinement, Kleene algebra with tests}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17
Contrasting Deadlock-Free Session Processes

Authors: Juan C. Jaramillo and Jorge A. Pérez

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Deadlock freedom is a crucial property for message-passing programs. Over the years, several different type systems for concurrent processes that ensure deadlock freedom have been proposed; this diversity raises the question of how they compare. We address this question, considering two type systems not covered in prior work: Kokke et al.’s HCP, a type system based on a linear logic with hypersequents, and Padovani’s priority-based type system for asynchronous processes, dubbed 𝖯. Their distinctive features make formal comparisons relevant and challenging. Our findings are two-fold: (1) the hypersequent setting does not drastically change the class of deadlock-free processes induced by linear logic, and (2) we relate the classes of deadlock-free processes induced by HCP and 𝖯. We prove that our results hold under both synchronous and asynchronous communication. Our results provide new insights into the essential mechanisms involved in statically avoiding deadlocks in concurrency.
Cite as

Juan C. Jaramillo and Jorge A. Pérez. Contrasting Deadlock-Free Session Processes. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 17:1-17:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jaramillo_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17,
  author =	{Jaramillo, Juan C. and P\'{e}rez, Jorge A.},
  title =	{{Contrasting Deadlock-Free Session Processes}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233103},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: session types, process calculi, deadlock freedom}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2023.2
Local Completeness for Program Correctness and Incorrectness (Invited Talk)

Authors: Roberto Bruni

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 270, 10th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2023)

Abstract
Program correctness techniques aim to prove the absence of bugs, but can yield false alarms because they tend to over-approximate program semantics. Vice versa, program incorrectness methods are aimed to detect true bugs, without false alarms, but cannot be used to prove correctness, because they under-approximate program semantics. In this invited talk we will overview our ongoing research on the use of the abstract interpretation framework to combine under- and over-approximation in the same analysis and distill a logic for program correctness and incorrectness.
Cite as

Roberto Bruni. Local Completeness for Program Correctness and Incorrectness (Invited Talk). In 10th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 270, pp. 2:1-2:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bruni:LIPIcs.CALCO.2023.2,
  author =	{Bruni, Roberto},
  title =	{{Local Completeness for Program Correctness and Incorrectness}},
  booktitle =	{10th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2023)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:2},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-287-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{270},
  editor =	{Baldan, Paolo and de Paiva, Valeria},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2023.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-187993},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2023.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Program analysis, program verification, Hoare logic, incorrectness logic, abstract interpretation, local completeness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.4
Towards a Unifying Framework for Tuning Analysis Precision by Program Transformation

Authors: Mila Dalla Preda

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 86, Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages (2020)

Abstract
Static and dynamic program analyses attempt to extract useful information on program’s behaviours. Static analysis uses an abstract model of programs to reason on their runtime behaviour without actually running them, while dynamic analysis reasons on a test set of real program executions. For this reason, the precision of static analysis is limited by the presence of false positives (executions allowed by the abstract model that cannot happen at runtime), while the precision of dynamic analysis is limited by the presence of false negatives (real executions that are not in the test set). Researchers have developed many analysis techniques and tools in the attempt to increase the precision of program verification. Software protection is an interesting scenario where programs need to be protected from adversaries that use program analysis to understand their inner working and then exploit this knowledge to perform some illicit actions. Program analysis plays a dual role in program verification and software protection: in program verification we want the analysis to be as precise as possible, while in software protection we want to degrade the results of the analysis as much as possible. Indeed, in software protection researchers usually recur to a special class of program transformations, called code obfuscation, to modify a program in order to make it more difficult to analyse while preserving its intended functionality. In this setting, it is interesting to study how program transformations that preserve the intended behaviour of programs can affect the precision of both static and dynamic analysis. While some works have been done in order to formalise the efficiency of code obfuscation in degrading static analysis and in the possibility of transforming programs in order to avoid or increase false positives, less attention has been posed to formalise the relation between program transformations and false negatives in dynamic analysis. In this work we are setting the scene for a formal investigation of the syntactic and semantic program features that affect the presence of false negatives in dynamic analysis. We believe that this understanding would be useful for improving the precision of the existing dynamic analysis tools and in the design of program transformations that complicate the dynamic analysis. To Maurizio on his 60th birthday!
Cite as

Mila Dalla Preda. Towards a Unifying Framework for Tuning Analysis Precision by Program Transformation. In Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages. Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 86, pp. 4:1-4:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dallapreda:OASIcs.Gabbrielli.4,
  author =	{Dalla Preda, Mila},
  title =	{{Towards a Unifying Framework for Tuning Analysis Precision by Program Transformation}},
  booktitle =	{Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages},
  pages =	{4:1--4:22},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-171-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{86},
  editor =	{de Boer, Frank S. and Mauro, Jacopo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-132263},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Program analysis, analysis precision, program transformation, software protection, code obfuscation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.04241.4
Summary 3: On Graph(ic) Encodings

Authors: Roberto Bruni and Ivan Lanese

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4241, Graph Transformations and Process Algebras for Modeling Distributed and Mobile Systems (2005)

Abstract
This paper is an informal summary of different encoding techniques from process calculi and distributed formalisms to graphic frameworks. The survey includes the use of solo diagrams, term graphs, synchronized hyperedge replacement systems, bigraphs, tile models and interactive systems, all presented at the Dagstuhl Seminar 04241. The common theme of all techniques recalled here is having a graphic presentation that, at the same time, gives both an intuitive visual rendering (of processes, states, etc.) and a rigorous mathematical framework.
Cite as

Roberto Bruni and Ivan Lanese. Summary 3: On Graph(ic) Encodings. In Graph Transformations and Process Algebras for Modeling Distributed and Mobile Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4241, pp. 1-15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bruni_et_al:DagSemProc.04241.4,
  author =	{Bruni, Roberto and Lanese, Ivan},
  title =	{{Summary 3: On Graph(ic) Encodings}},
  booktitle =	{Graph Transformations and Process Algebras for Modeling Distributed and Mobile Systems},
  pages =	{1--15},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{4241},
  editor =	{Barbara K\"{o}nig and Ugo Montanari and Philippa Gardner},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.04241.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-303},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.04241.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: graph transformation , process calculi , encodings}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 5 Document/PDF
  • 2 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2025
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2005

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Bruni, Roberto
  • 1 Baldan, Paolo
  • 1 Dalla Preda, Mila
  • 1 Jaramillo, Juan C.
  • 1 Lanese, Ivan
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 3 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs
  • 1 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Abstraction
  • 2 Theory of computation → Programming logic
  • 1 Security and privacy → Software reverse engineering
  • 1 Theory of computation → Hoare logic
  • 1 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Program analysis
  • 2 abstract interpretation
  • 2 local completeness
  • 2 process calculi
  • 1 ACTL
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact