DROPS

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 134

33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)

ECOOP 2019, July 15-19, 2019, London, United Kingdom

Editors: Alastair F. Donaldson

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.3

A Dynamic Logic for Symbolic Execution for the Smart Contract Programming Language Michelson

Authors: Barnabas Arvay, Thi Thu Ha Doan, and Peter Thiemann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 313, 38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024)

Abstract

Verification of smart contracts is an important topic in the context of blockchain technology. We study an approach to verification that is based on symbolic execution. As a formal basis for symbolic execution, we design a dynamic logic for Michelson, the smart contract language of the Tezos blockchain, and prove its soundness in the proof assistant Agda. Towards the soundness proof we formalize the concrete semantics as well as its symbolic counterpart in a unified setting. The logic encompasses single contract runs as well as inter-contract runs chained in a single transaction.

Cite as

Barnabas Arvay, Thi Thu Ha Doan, and Peter Thiemann. A Dynamic Logic for Symbolic Execution for the Smart Contract Programming Language Michelson. In 38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 313, pp. 3:1-3:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{arvay_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.3,
  author =	{Arvay, Barnabas and Doan, Thi Thu Ha and Thiemann, Peter},
  title =	{{A Dynamic Logic for Symbolic Execution for the Smart Contract Programming Language Michelson}},
  booktitle =	{38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-341-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{313},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Salvaneschi, Guido},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-208529},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Smart Contract, Blockchain, Formal Verification, Symbolic Execution}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.42

Failure Transparency in Stateful Dataflow Systems

Authors: Aleksey Veresov, Jonas Spenger, Paris Carbone, and Philipp Haller

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 313, 38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024)

Abstract

Failure transparency enables users to reason about distributed systems at a higher level of abstraction, where complex failure-handling logic is hidden. This is especially true for stateful dataflow systems, which are the backbone of many cloud applications. In particular, this paper focuses on proving failure transparency in Apache Flink, a popular stateful dataflow system. Even though failure transparency is a critical aspect of Apache Flink, to date it has not been formally proven. Showing that the failure transparency mechanism is correct, however, is challenging due to the complexity of the mechanism itself. Nevertheless, this complexity can be effectively hidden behind a failure transparent programming interface. To show that Apache Flink is failure transparent, we model it in small-step operational semantics. Next, we provide a novel definition of failure transparency based on observational explainability, a concept which relates executions according to their observations. Finally, we provide a formal proof of failure transparency for the implementation model; i.e., we prove that the failure-free model correctly abstracts from the failure-related details of the implementation model. We also show liveness of the implementation model under a fair execution assumption. These results are a first step towards a verified stack for stateful dataflow systems.

Cite as

Aleksey Veresov, Jonas Spenger, Paris Carbone, and Philipp Haller. Failure Transparency in Stateful Dataflow Systems. In 38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 313, pp. 42:1-42:31, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{veresov_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.42,
  author =	{Veresov, Aleksey and Spenger, Jonas and Carbone, Paris and Haller, Philipp},
  title =	{{Failure Transparency in Stateful Dataflow Systems}},
  booktitle =	{38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024)},
  pages =	{42:1--42:31},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-341-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{313},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Salvaneschi, Guido},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.42},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-208911},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.42},
  annote =	{Keywords: Failure transparency, stateful dataflow, operational semantics, checkpoint recovery}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.9

Verifying Peephole Rewriting in SSA Compiler IRs

Authors: Siddharth Bhat, Alex Keizer, Chris Hughes, Andrés Goens, and Tobias Grosser

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 309, 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)

Abstract

There is an increasing need for domain-specific reasoning in modern compilers. This has fueled the use of tailored intermediate representations (IRs) based on static single assignment (SSA), like in the MLIR compiler framework. Interactive theorem provers (ITPs) provide strong guarantees for the end-to-end verification of compilers (e.g., CompCert). However, modern compilers and their IRs evolve at a rate that makes proof engineering alongside them prohibitively expensive. Nevertheless, well-scoped push-button automated verification tools such as the Alive peephole verifier for LLVM-IR gained recognition in domains where SMT solvers offer efficient (semi) decision procedures. In this paper, we aim to combine the convenience of automation with the versatility of ITPs for verifying peephole rewrites across domain-specific IRs. We formalize a core calculus for SSA-based IRs that is generic over the IR and covers so-called regions (nested scoping used by many domain-specific IRs in the MLIR ecosystem). Our mechanization in the Lean proof assistant provides a user-friendly frontend for translating MLIR syntax into our calculus. We provide scaffolding for defining and verifying peephole rewrites, offering tactics to eliminate the abstraction overhead of our SSA calculus. We prove correctness theorems about peephole rewriting, as well as two classical program transformations. To evaluate our framework, we consider three use cases from the MLIR ecosystem that cover different levels of abstractions: (1) bitvector rewrites from LLVM, (2) structured control flow, and (3) fully homomorphic encryption. We envision that our mechanization provides a foundation for formally verified rewrites on new domain-specific IRs.

Cite as

Siddharth Bhat, Alex Keizer, Chris Hughes, Andrés Goens, and Tobias Grosser. Verifying Peephole Rewriting in SSA Compiler IRs. In 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 309, pp. 9:1-9:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bhat_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2024.9,
  author =	{Bhat, Siddharth and Keizer, Alex and Hughes, Chris and Goens, Andr\'{e}s and Grosser, Tobias},
  title =	{{Verifying Peephole Rewriting in SSA Compiler IRs}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-337-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{309},
  editor =	{Bertot, Yves and Kutsia, Temur and Norrish, Michael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-207372},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: compilers, semantics, mechanization, MLIR, SSA, regions, peephole rewrites}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.29

Mutational Fuzz Testing for Constraint Modeling Systems

Authors: Wout Vanroose, Ignace Bleukx, Jo Devriendt, Dimos Tsouros, Hélène Verhaeghe, and Tias Guns

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 307, 30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024)

Abstract

Constraint programming (CP) modeling languages, like MiniZinc, Essence and CPMpy, play a crucial role in making CP technology accessible to non-experts. Both solver-independent modeling frameworks and solvers themselves are complex pieces of software that can contain bugs, which undermines their usefulness. Mutational fuzz testing is a way to test complex systems by stochastically mutating input and verifying preserved properties of the mutated output. We investigate different mutations and verification methods that can be used on the constraint specifications directly. This includes methods proposed in the context of SMT problem specifications, as well as new methods related to global constraints, optimization, and solution counting/preservation. Our results show that such a fuzz testing approach improves the overall code coverage of a modeling system compared to only unit testing, and is able to find bugs in the whole toolchain, from the modeling language transformations themselves to the underlying solvers.

Cite as

Wout Vanroose, Ignace Bleukx, Jo Devriendt, Dimos Tsouros, Hélène Verhaeghe, and Tias Guns. Mutational Fuzz Testing for Constraint Modeling Systems. In 30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 307, pp. 29:1-29:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vanroose_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2024.29,
  author =	{Vanroose, Wout and Bleukx, Ignace and Devriendt, Jo and Tsouros, Dimos and Verhaeghe, H\'{e}l\`{e}ne and Guns, Tias},
  title =	{{Mutational Fuzz Testing for Constraint Modeling Systems}},
  booktitle =	{30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-336-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{307},
  editor =	{Shaw, Paul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-207149},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: fuzz testing, Constraint modeling language, bugs, mutational testing, modeling, constraint reformulation}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.14

Cooking String-Integer Conversions with Noodles

Authors: Vojtěch Havlena, Lukáš Holík, Ondřej Lengál, and Juraj Síč

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 305, 27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024)

Abstract

We propose a method for efficient handling string constraints with string-integer conversions. It extends the recently introduced stabilization-based procedure for solving string (dis)equations with regular and length constraints. Our approach is to translate the conversions into a linear integer arithmetic formula, together with regular constraints and word equations. We have integrated it into the string solver Z3-Noodler, and our experiments show that it is competitive and on some established benchmarks even several orders of magnitude faster than the state of the art.

Cite as

Vojtěch Havlena, Lukáš Holík, Ondřej Lengál, and Juraj Síč. Cooking String-Integer Conversions with Noodles. In 27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 305, pp. 14:1-14:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{havlena_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2024.14,
  author =	{Havlena, Vojt\v{e}ch and Hol{\'\i}k, Luk\'{a}\v{s} and Leng\'{a}l, Ond\v{r}ej and S{\'\i}\v{c}, Juraj},
  title =	{{Cooking String-Integer Conversions with Noodles}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-334-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{305},
  editor =	{Chakraborty, Supratik and Jiang, Jie-Hong Roland},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-205365},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: string solving, string conversions, SMT solving}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2024.5

Shared Resource Contention in MCUs: A Reality Check and the Quest for Timeliness

Authors: Daniel Oliveira, Weifan Chen, Sandro Pinto, and Renato Mancuso

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 298, 36th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2024)

Abstract

Microcontrollers (MCUs) are steadily embracing multi-core technology to meet growing performance demands. This trend marks a shift from their traditionally simple, deterministic designs to more complex and inherently less predictable architectures. While shared resource contention is well-studied in mid to high-end embedded systems, the emergence of multi-core architectures in MCUs introduces unique challenges and characteristics that existing research has not fully explored. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth investigation of both mainstream and next-generation MCU-based platforms, aiming to identify the sources of contention on systems typically lacking these problems. We empirically demonstrate substantial contention effects across different MCU architectures (i.e., from single- to multi-core configurations), highlighting significant application slowdowns. Notably, we observe that slowdowns can reach several orders of magnitude, with the most extreme cases showing up to a 3800x (times, not percent) increase in execution time. To address these issues, we propose and evaluate muTPArtc, a novel mechanism designed for Timely Progress Assessment (TPA) and TPA-based runtime control specifically tailored to MCUs. muTPArtc is an MCU-specialized TPA-based mechanism that leverages hardware facilities widely available in commercial off-the-shelf MCUs (i.e., hardware breakpoints and cycle counters) to successfully monitor applications' progress, detect, and mitigate timing violations. Our results demonstrate that muTPArtc effectively manages performance degradation due to interference, requiring only minimal modifications to the build pipeline and no changes to the source code of the target application, while incurring minor overheads.

Cite as

Daniel Oliveira, Weifan Chen, Sandro Pinto, and Renato Mancuso. Shared Resource Contention in MCUs: A Reality Check and the Quest for Timeliness. In 36th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 298, pp. 5:1-5:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{oliveira_et_al:LIPIcs.ECRTS.2024.5,
  author =	{Oliveira, Daniel and Chen, Weifan and Pinto, Sandro and Mancuso, Renato},
  title =	{{Shared Resource Contention in MCUs: A Reality Check and the Quest for Timeliness}},
  booktitle =	{36th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2024)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-324-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{298},
  editor =	{Pellizzoni, Rodolfo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2024.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-203088},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2024.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: multi-core microcontrollers, shared resources contention, progress-aware regulation}
}

Document

Artifact

DOI: 10.4230/DARTS.6.2.3

Putting Randomized Compiler Testing into Production (Artifact)

Authors: Alastair F. Donaldson, Hugues Evrard, and Paul Thomson

Published in: DARTS, Volume 6, Issue 2, Special Issue of the 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract

This artifact accompanies our experience report for our compiler testing technology transfer project: taking the GraphicsFuzz research project on randomized metamorphic testing of graphics shader compilers, and building the necessary tooling around it to provide a highly automated process for improving the Khronos Vulkan Conformance Test Suite (CTS) with test cases that expose fuzzer-found compiler bugs, or that plug gaps in test coverage. The artifact consists of two Dockerfiles and associated files that can be used to build two Docker containers. The containers include our main tool for performing fuzzing: gfauto. The containers allow the user to fuzz SwiftShader, a software Vulkan implementation, finding 4 bugs. The user will also perform some line coverage analysis of SwiftShader using our tools to synthesize a small test that increases line coverage. Ubuntu, gfauto, SwiftShader, and other dependencies inside the Docker containers are fixed at specific versions, and all random seeds are set to specific values. Thus, all examples should reproduce faithfully on any machine.

Cite as

Alastair F. Donaldson, Hugues Evrard, and Paul Thomson. Putting Randomized Compiler Testing into Production (Artifact). In Special Issue of the 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Dagstuhl Artifacts Series (DARTS), Volume 6, Issue 2, pp. 3:1-3:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{donaldson_et_al:DARTS.6.2.3,
  author =	{Donaldson, Alastair F. and Evrard, Hugues and Thomson, Paul},
  title =	{{Putting Randomized Compiler Testing into Production (Artifact)}},
  pages =	{3:1--3:2},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Artifacts Series},
  ISSN =	{2509-8195},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{6},
  number =	{2},
  editor =	{Donaldson, Alastair F. and Evrard, Hugues and Thomson, Paul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DARTS.6.2.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-132005},
  doi =		{10.4230/DARTS.6.2.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Compilers, metamorphic testing, 3D graphics, experience report}
}

Document

Tool Insights Paper

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.13

Test-Case Reduction via Test-Case Generation: Insights from the Hypothesis Reducer (Tool Insights Paper)

Authors: David R. MacIver and Alastair F. Donaldson

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract

We describe internal test-case reduction, the method of test-case reduction employed by Hypothesis, a widely-used property-based testing library for Python. The key idea of internal test-case reduction is that instead of applying test-case reduction externally to generated test cases, we apply it internally, to the sequence of random choices made during generation, so that a test case is reduced by continually re-generating smaller and simpler test cases that continue to trigger some property of interest (e.g. a bug in the system under test). This allows for fully generic test-case reduction without any user intervention and without the need to write a specific test-case reducer for a particular application domain. It also significantly mitigates the impact of the test-case validity problem, by ensuring that any reduced test case is one that could in principle have been generated. We describe the rationale behind this approach, explain its implementation in Hypothesis, and present an extensive evaluation comparing its effectiveness with that of several other test-case reducers, including C-Reduce and delta debugging, on applications including Python auto-formatting, C compilers, and the SymPy symbolic math library. Our hope is that these insights into the reduction mechanism employed by Hypothesis will be useful to researchers interested in randomized testing and test-case reduction, as the crux of the approach is fully generic and should be applicable to any random generator of test cases.

Cite as

David R. MacIver and Alastair F. Donaldson. Test-Case Reduction via Test-Case Generation: Insights from the Hypothesis Reducer (Tool Insights Paper). In 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 13:1-13:27, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{maciver_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.13,
  author =	{MacIver, David R. and Donaldson, Alastair F.},
  title =	{{Test-Case Reduction via Test-Case Generation: Insights from the Hypothesis Reducer}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:27},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131700},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Software testing, test-case reduction}
}

Document

Experience Report

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.22

Putting Randomized Compiler Testing into Production (Experience Report)

Authors: Alastair F. Donaldson, Hugues Evrard, and Paul Thomson

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract

We describe our experience over the last 18 months on a compiler testing technology transfer project: taking the GraphicsFuzz research project on randomized metamorphic testing of graphics shader compilers, and building the necessary tooling around it to provide a highly automated process for improving the Khronos Vulkan Conformance Test Suite (CTS) with test cases that expose fuzzer-found compiler bugs, or that plug gaps in test coverage. We present this tooling for test automation - gfauto - in detail, as well as our use of differential coverage and test case reduction as a method for automatically synthesizing tests that fill coverage gaps. We explain the value that GraphicsFuzz has provided in automatically testing the ecosystem of tools for transforming, optimizing and validating Vulkan shaders, and the challenges faced when testing a tool ecosystem rather than a single tool. We discuss practical issues associated with putting automated metamorphic testing into production, related to test case validity, bug de-duplication and floating-point precision, and provide illustrative examples of bugs found during our work.

Cite as

Alastair F. Donaldson, Hugues Evrard, and Paul Thomson. Putting Randomized Compiler Testing into Production (Experience Report). In 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 22:1-22:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{donaldson_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.22,
  author =	{Donaldson, Alastair F. and Evrard, Hugues and Thomson, Paul},
  title =	{{Putting Randomized Compiler Testing into Production}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131791},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Compilers, metamorphic testing, 3D graphics, experience report}
}

Document

Complete Volume

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019

LIPIcs, Volume 134, ECOOP'19, Complete Volume

Authors: Alastair F. Donaldson

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 134, 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)

Abstract

LIPIcs, Volume 134, ECOOP'19, Complete Volume

Cite as

33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 134, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Proceedings{donaldson:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019,
  title =	{{LIPIcs, Volume 134, ECOOP'19, Complete Volume}},
  booktitle =	{33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-111-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Donaldson, Alastair F.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-108979},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019},
  annote =	{Keywords: Software and its engineering}
}

Document

Front Matter

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.0

Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Authors: Alastair F. Donaldson

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 134, 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)

Abstract

Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Cite as

33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 134, pp. 0:i-0:xxv, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{donaldson:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.0,
  author =	{Donaldson, Alastair F.},
  title =	{{Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}},
  booktitle =	{33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)},
  pages =	{0:i--0:xxv},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-111-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Donaldson, Alastair F.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.0},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-107928},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.0},
  annote =	{Keywords: Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.1

Lifestate: Event-Driven Protocols and Callback Control Flow

Authors: Shawn Meier, Sergio Mover, and Bor-Yuh Evan Chang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 134, 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)

Abstract

Developing interactive applications (apps) against event-driven software frameworks such as Android is notoriously difficult. To create apps that behave as expected, developers must follow complex and often implicit asynchronous programming protocols. Such protocols intertwine the proper registering of callbacks to receive control from the framework with appropriate application-programming interface (API) calls that in turn affect the set of possible future callbacks. An app violates the protocol when, for example, it calls a particular API method in a state of the framework where such a call is invalid. What makes automated reasoning hard in this domain is largely what makes programming apps against such frameworks hard: the specification of the protocol is unclear, and the control flow is complex, asynchronous, and higher-order. In this paper, we tackle the problem of specifying and modeling event-driven application-programming protocols. In particular, we formalize a core meta-model that captures the dialogue between event-driven frameworks and application callbacks. Based on this meta-model, we define a language called lifestate that permits precise and formal descriptions of application-programming protocols and the callback control flow imposed by the event-driven framework. Lifestate unifies modeling what app callbacks can expect of the framework with specifying rules the app must respect when calling into the framework. In this way, we effectively combine lifecycle constraints and typestate rules. To evaluate the effectiveness of lifestate modeling, we provide a dynamic verification algorithm that takes as input a trace of execution of an app and a lifestate protocol specification to either produce a trace witnessing a protocol violation or a proof that no such trace is realizable.

Cite as

Shawn Meier, Sergio Mover, and Bor-Yuh Evan Chang. Lifestate: Event-Driven Protocols and Callback Control Flow. In 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 134, pp. 1:1-1:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{meier_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.1,
  author =	{Meier, Shawn and Mover, Sergio and Chang, Bor-Yuh Evan},
  title =	{{Lifestate: Event-Driven Protocols and Callback Control Flow}},
  booktitle =	{33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-111-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Donaldson, Alastair F.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-107932},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: event-driven systems, application-programming protocols, application framework interfaces, callbacks, sound framework modeling, predictive dynamic verification}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.2

Godot: All the Benefits of Implicit and Explicit Futures

Authors: Kiko Fernandez-Reyes, Dave Clarke, Ludovic Henrio, Einar Broch Johnsen, and Tobias Wrigstad

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 134, 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)

Abstract

Concurrent programs often make use of futures, handles to the results of asynchronous operations. Futures provide means to communicate not yet computed results, and simplify the implementation of operations that synchronise on the result of such asynchronous operations. Futures can be characterised as implicit or explicit, depending on the typing discipline used to type them. Current future implementations suffer from "future proliferation", either at the type-level or at run-time. The former adds future type wrappers, which hinders subtype polymorphism and exposes the client to the internal asynchronous communication architecture. The latter increases latency, by traversing nested future structures at run-time. Many languages suffer both kinds. Previous work offer partial solutions to the future proliferation problems; in this paper we show how these solutions can be integrated in an elegant and coherent way, which is more expressive than either system in isolation. We describe our proposal formally, and state and prove its key properties, in two related calculi, based on the two possible families of future constructs (data-flow futures and control-flow futures). The former relies on static type information to avoid unwanted future creation, and the latter uses an algebraic data type with dynamic checks. We also discuss how to implement our new system efficiently.

Cite as

Kiko Fernandez-Reyes, Dave Clarke, Ludovic Henrio, Einar Broch Johnsen, and Tobias Wrigstad. Godot: All the Benefits of Implicit and Explicit Futures. In 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 134, pp. 2:1-2:28, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fernandezreyes_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.2,
  author =	{Fernandez-Reyes, Kiko and Clarke, Dave and Henrio, Ludovic and Johnsen, Einar Broch and Wrigstad, Tobias},
  title =	{{Godot: All the Benefits of Implicit and Explicit Futures}},
  booktitle =	{33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:28},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-111-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Donaldson, Alastair F.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-107949},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Futures, Concurrency, Type Systems, Formal Semantics}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.3

Multitier Modules

Authors: Pascal Weisenburger and Guido Salvaneschi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 134, 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)

Abstract

Multitier programming languages address the complexity of developing distributed systems abstracting over low level implementation details such as data representation, serialization and network protocols. Since the functionalities of different peers can be defined in the same compilation unit, multitier languages do not force developers to modularize software along network boundaries. Unfortunately, combining the code for all tiers into the same compilation unit poses a scalability challenge or forces developers to resort to traditional modularization abstractions that are agnostic to the multitier nature of the language. In this paper, we address this issue with a module system for multitier languages. Our module system supports encapsulating each (cross-peer) functionality and defining it over abstract peer types. As a result, we disentangle modularization and distribution and we enable the definition of a distributed system as a composition of multitier modules, each representing a subsystem. Our case studies on distributed algorithms, distributed data structures, as well as on the Apache Flink task distribution system, show that multitier modules allow the definition of reusable (abstract) patterns of interaction in distributed software and enable separating the modularization and distribution concerns, properly separating functionalities in distributed systems.

Cite as

Pascal Weisenburger and Guido Salvaneschi. Multitier Modules. In 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 134, pp. 3:1-3:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{weisenburger_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.3,
  author =	{Weisenburger, Pascal and Salvaneschi, Guido},
  title =	{{Multitier Modules}},
  booktitle =	{33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-111-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Donaldson, Alastair F.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-107957},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed Programming, Multitier Programming, Abstract Peer Types, Placement Types, Module Systems, Scala}
}

46 Search Results for "Donaldson, Alastair F."

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Thanks for your feedback!

Could not send message