41 Search Results for "Pape, Tobias"

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 166

34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

ECOOP 2020, November 15-17, 2020, Berlin, Germany (Virtual Conference)

Editors: Robert Hirschfeld and Tobias Pape

Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.6
Exploration and Complexity Management in Graph-Based Programming Environments

Authors: Max Boksem and L. Thomas van Binsbergen

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 134, Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)

Abstract
Programmers often rely on different environments depending on the nature of their tasks. For large-scale software projects, IDEs help manage complexity through structured abstractions like files, modules, and classes, and provide tools for code visualization and navigation. In contrast, exploratory programming tasks - such as data analysis, rapid prototyping, and design space exploration - are better served by interactive environments like REPLs and Notebooks, which support incremental development and immediate feedback. However, these tools tend to prioritize either complexity management or exploration, limiting their effectiveness across contexts. This paper investigates a hybrid graph-based programming environment that bridges these two modes by building on Incremental Graph Code (IGC), a graph-based system for structuring, visualizing, and interacting with source code. We explore how IGC can support both complexity management and exploratory programming through three key features: projectional views for aggregating and navigating interrelated code and documentation, graph-type nodes for encapsulating subgraphs to manage structural complexity, and an exploratory programming view for managing branching executions and promoting experimentation. Together, these features suggest that graph-based environments like IGC can offer a unified platform for both systematic software engineering and dynamic, exploratory development.
Cite as

Max Boksem and L. Thomas van Binsbergen. Exploration and Complexity Management in Graph-Based Programming Environments. In Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 134, pp. 6:1-6:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{boksem_et_al:OASIcs.Programming.2025.6,
  author =	{Boksem, Max and van Binsbergen, L. Thomas},
  title =	{{Exploration and Complexity Management in Graph-Based Programming Environments}},
  booktitle =	{Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:18},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-382-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Edwards, Jonathan and Perera, Roly and Petricek, Tomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242906},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph-based Programming Environments, Exploratory Programming, Complexity Management, Incremental Graph Code (IGC), Projectional Views}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.15
Encouraging Experimentation Through Programming by Proximity

Authors: Tom Beckmann, Leonard Geier, Stefan Ramson, Marcel Taeumel, and Robert Hirschfeld

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 134, Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)

Abstract
Exploratory programming involves evaluating a variety of approaches to identify those that advance the problem understanding. For this purpose, we investigated a notation for code designed to encourage experimentation with elements of a program. In our proof-of-concept, we evaluate the idea of program elements connecting by mere proximity through small case studies. We identify multiple constraints to enable connection through proximity and its limitations.
Cite as

Tom Beckmann, Leonard Geier, Stefan Ramson, Marcel Taeumel, and Robert Hirschfeld. Encouraging Experimentation Through Programming by Proximity. In Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 134, pp. 15:1-15:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{beckmann_et_al:OASIcs.Programming.2025.15,
  author =	{Beckmann, Tom and Geier, Leonard and Ramson, Stefan and Taeumel, Marcel and Hirschfeld, Robert},
  title =	{{Encouraging Experimentation Through Programming by Proximity}},
  booktitle =	{Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-382-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Edwards, Jonathan and Perera, Roly and Petricek, Tomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242991},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: Visual Programming, Proximity, Experimentation Support}
}
Document
Experience Paper
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.39
WebGlitch: A Randomised Testing Tool for the WebGPU API (Experience Paper)

Authors: Matthew K. L. Wong and Alastair F. Donaldson

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
We report on our experience designing a new technique and tool for fuzzing implementations of WebGPU, a W3C standard JavaScript API for in-browser GPU computing. We also report on our experience using our WebGlitch tool to test industrial-strength implementations of WebGPU, leading to the discovery of numerous bugs. WebGPU enables programmatic access to a device’s graphics processing unit (GPU) for in-browser GPU computing, and is being implemented by Google, Mozilla and Apple for inclusion in all of the major web browsers. Guaranteeing the security and reliability of WebGPU is crucial to avoid wide-reaching browser security vulnerabilities and to facilitate portability by ensuring uniform behaviour across different platforms. To that end - inspired by randomised compiler testing techniques - our approach to fuzzing creates random, valid-by-construction programs by continuously selecting a WebGPU API function, then recursively generating all requirements necessary for that API call to be valid based on careful modelling of the API specification. This is implemented as a new open source tool, WebGlitch, which we designed in consultation with engineers at Google who work on the Chrome WebGPU implementation. WebGlitch identifies bugs through sanitiser-boosted crash oracles, differential testing, and by identifying cases where valid-by-construction API calls lead to runtime errors. We present an evaluation showing that WebGlitch can find bugs missed by an existing WebGPU fuzzer, wg-fuzz, and across the broader WebGPU ecosystem: to date, WebGlitch has found 24 previously-unknown bugs (15 fixed so far in response to our reports). Among these, 17 bugs affected WebGPU implementations from Google, Mozilla, and the Deno project. WebGlitch found an additional 4 bugs in the shader compilers used by the graphics APIs that WebGPU interfaces with. The remaining 3 bugs affect the widely-used JavaScript runtimes Node.js and Deno. Fuzzing with WebGlitch also led us to identify an ambiguity in the specification of the WebGPU shading language, for which we proposed an amendment that was accepted by W3C and which has been adopted in the latest version of the specification. Analysing the line coverage of a WebGPU implementation by WebGlitch-generated programs revealed that WebGlitch covers code missed by wg-fuzz and the official conformance test suite. Our hope is that this report on the design of WebGlitch and its deployment in practice will be useful for practitioners and researchers interested in using API fuzzing to improve the reliability of industrial codebases.
Cite as

Matthew K. L. Wong and Alastair F. Donaldson. WebGlitch: A Randomised Testing Tool for the WebGPU API (Experience Paper). In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 39:1-39:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{wong_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.39,
  author =	{Wong, Matthew K. L. and Donaldson, Alastair F.},
  title =	{{WebGlitch: A Randomised Testing Tool for the WebGPU API}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233313},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fuzzing, WebGPU, WGSL, API, shaders}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.16
A Lightweight Method for Generating Multi-Tier JIT Compilation Virtual Machine in a Meta-Tracing Compiler Framework

Authors: Yusuke Izawa, Hidehiko Masuhara, and Carl Friedrich Bolz-Tereick

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Meta-compiler frameworks, such as RPython and Graal/Truffle, generate high-performance virtual machines (VMs) from interpreter definitions. Although they generate VMs with high-quality just-in-time (JIT) compilers, they still lack an important feature that dedicated VMs (i.e., VMs that are developed for specific languages) have, namely multi-tier compilation. Multi-tier compilation uses light-weight compilers at early stages and highly optimizing compilers at later stages in order to balance between compilation overheads and code quality. We propose a novel approach to enabling multi-tier compilation in the VMs generated by a meta-compiler framework. Instead of extending the JIT compiler backend of the framework, our approach drives an existing (heavyweight) compiler backend in the framework to quickly generate unoptimized native code by merely embedding directives and compile-time operations into interpreter definitions. As a validation of the approach, we developed 2SOM, a Simple Object Machine with a two-tier JIT compiler based on RPython. 2SOM first applies the tier-1 threaded code generator that is generated by our proposed technique, then, to the loops that exceed a threshold, applies the tier-2 tracing JIT compiler that is generated by the original RPython framework. Our performance evaluation that runs a program with a realistic workload showed that 2SOM improved, when compared against an RPython-based VM, warm-up performance by 15%, with merely a 5% reduction in peak performance.
Cite as

Yusuke Izawa, Hidehiko Masuhara, and Carl Friedrich Bolz-Tereick. A Lightweight Method for Generating Multi-Tier JIT Compilation Virtual Machine in a Meta-Tracing Compiler Framework. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 16:1-16:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{izawa_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.16,
  author =	{Izawa, Yusuke and Masuhara, Hidehiko and Bolz-Tereick, Carl Friedrich},
  title =	{{A Lightweight Method for Generating Multi-Tier JIT Compilation Virtual Machine in a Meta-Tracing Compiler Framework}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233090},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: virtual machine, JIT compiler, multi-tier JIT compiler, meta-tracing JIT compiler, RPython}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17
Contrasting Deadlock-Free Session Processes

Authors: Juan C. Jaramillo and Jorge A. Pérez

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Deadlock freedom is a crucial property for message-passing programs. Over the years, several different type systems for concurrent processes that ensure deadlock freedom have been proposed; this diversity raises the question of how they compare. We address this question, considering two type systems not covered in prior work: Kokke et al.’s HCP, a type system based on a linear logic with hypersequents, and Padovani’s priority-based type system for asynchronous processes, dubbed 𝖯. Their distinctive features make formal comparisons relevant and challenging. Our findings are two-fold: (1) the hypersequent setting does not drastically change the class of deadlock-free processes induced by linear logic, and (2) we relate the classes of deadlock-free processes induced by HCP and 𝖯. We prove that our results hold under both synchronous and asynchronous communication. Our results provide new insights into the essential mechanisms involved in statically avoiding deadlocks in concurrency.
Cite as

Juan C. Jaramillo and Jorge A. Pérez. Contrasting Deadlock-Free Session Processes. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 17:1-17:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jaramillo_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17,
  author =	{Jaramillo, Juan C. and P\'{e}rez, Jorge A.},
  title =	{{Contrasting Deadlock-Free Session Processes}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233103},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: session types, process calculi, deadlock freedom}
}
Document
Complete Volume
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020
LIPIcs, Volume 166, ECOOP 2020, Complete Volume

Authors: Robert Hirschfeld and Tobias Pape

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract
LIPIcs, Volume 166, ECOOP 2020, Complete Volume
Cite as

34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 1-906, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Proceedings{hirschfeld_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020,
  title =	{{LIPIcs, Volume 166, ECOOP 2020, Complete Volume}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{1--906},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131566},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020},
  annote =	{Keywords: LIPIcs, Volume 166, ECOOP 2020, Complete Volume}
}
Document
Front Matter
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.0
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Authors: Robert Hirschfeld and Tobias Pape

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization
Cite as

34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 0:i-0:xxviii, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hirschfeld_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.0,
  author =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  title =	{{Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{0:i--0:xxviii},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.0},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131572},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.0},
  annote =	{Keywords: Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.1
Sound Regular Corecursion in coFJ

Authors: Davide Ancona, Pietro Barbieri, Francesco Dagnino, and Elena Zucca

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract
The aim of the paper is to provide solid foundations for a programming paradigm natively supporting the creation and manipulation of cyclic data structures. To this end, we describe coFJ, a Java-like calculus where objects can be infinite and methods are equipped with a codefinition (an alternative body). We provide an abstract semantics of the calculus based on the framework of inference systems with corules. In coFJ with this semantics, FJ recursive methods on finite objects can be extended to infinite objects as well, and behave as desired by the programmer, by specifying a codefinition. We also describe an operational semantics which can be directly implemented in a programming language, and prove the soundness of such semantics with respect to the abstract one.
Cite as

Davide Ancona, Pietro Barbieri, Francesco Dagnino, and Elena Zucca. Sound Regular Corecursion in coFJ. In 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 1:1-1:28, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ancona_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.1,
  author =	{Ancona, Davide and Barbieri, Pietro and Dagnino, Francesco and Zucca, Elena},
  title =	{{Sound Regular Corecursion in coFJ}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:28},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131582},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Operational semantics, coinduction, programming paradigms, regular terms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.2
Perfect Is the Enemy of Good: Best-Effort Program Synthesis

Authors: Hila Peleg and Nadia Polikarpova

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract
Program synthesis promises to help software developers with everyday tasks by generating code snippets automatically from input-output examples and other high-level specifications. The conventional wisdom is that a synthesizer must always satisfy the specification exactly. We conjecture that this all-or-nothing paradigm stands in the way of adopting program synthesis as a developer tool: in practice, the user-written specification often contains errors or is simply too hard for the synthesizer to solve within a reasonable time; in these cases, the user is left with a single over-fitted result or, more often than not, no result at all. In this paper we propose a new program synthesis paradigm we call best-effort program synthesis, where the synthesizer returns a ranked list of partially-valid results, i.e. programs that satisfy some part of the specification. To support this paradigm, we develop best-effort enumeration, a new synthesis algorithm that extends a popular program enumeration technique with the ability to accumulate and return multiple partially-valid results with minimal overhead. We implement this algorithm in a tool called BESTER, and evaluate it on 79 synthesis benchmarks from the literature. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, our evaluation shows that BESTER returns useful results even when the specification is flawed or too hard: i) for all benchmarks with an error in the specification, the top three BESTER results contain the correct solution, and ii) for most hard benchmarks, the top three results contain non-trivial fragments of the correct solution. We also performed an exploratory user study, which confirms our intuition that partially-valid results are useful: the study shows that programmers use the output of the synthesizer for comprehension and often incorporate it into their solutions.
Cite as

Hila Peleg and Nadia Polikarpova. Perfect Is the Enemy of Good: Best-Effort Program Synthesis. In 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 2:1-2:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{peleg_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.2,
  author =	{Peleg, Hila and Polikarpova, Nadia},
  title =	{{Perfect Is the Enemy of Good: Best-Effort Program Synthesis}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:30},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131593},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Program Synthesis, Programming by Example}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.3
Blame for Null

Authors: Abel Nieto, Marianna Rapoport, Gregor Richards, and Ondřej Lhoták

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract
Multiple modern programming languages, including Kotlin, Scala, Swift, and C#, have type systems where nullability is explicitly specified in the types. All of the above also need to interoperate with languages where types remain implicitly nullable, like Java. This leads to runtime errors that can manifest in subtle ways. In this paper, we show how to reason about the presence and provenance of such nullability errors using the concept of blame from gradual typing. Specifically, we introduce a calculus, λ_null, where some terms are typed as implicitly nullable and others as explicitly nullable. Just like in the original blame calculus of Wadler and Findler, interactions between both kinds of terms are mediated by casts with attached blame labels, which indicate the origin of errors. On top of λ_null, we then create a second calculus, λ_null^s, which closely models the interoperability between languages with implicit nullability and languages with explicit nullability, such as Java and Scala. Our main result is a theorem that states that nullability errors in λ_null^s can always be blamed on terms with less-precise typing; that is, terms typed as implicitly nullable. By analogy, this would mean that NullPointerExceptions in combined Java/Scala programs are always the result of unsoundness in the Java type system. We summarize our result with the slogan explicitly nullable programs can't be blamed. All our results are formalized in the Coq proof assistant.
Cite as

Abel Nieto, Marianna Rapoport, Gregor Richards, and Ondřej Lhoták. Blame for Null. In 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 3:1-3:28, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nieto_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.3,
  author =	{Nieto, Abel and Rapoport, Marianna and Richards, Gregor and Lhot\'{a}k, Ond\v{r}ej},
  title =	{{Blame for Null}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:28},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131606},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: nullability, type systems, blame calculus, gradual typing}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.4
Static Race Detection and Mutex Safety and Liveness for Go Programs

Authors: Julia Gabet and Nobuko Yoshida

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract
Go is a popular concurrent programming language thanks to its ability to efficiently combine concurrency and systems programming. In Go programs, a number of concurrency bugs can be caused by a mixture of data races and communication problems. In this paper, we develop a theory based on behavioural types to statically detect data races and deadlocks in Go programs. We first specify lock safety/liveness and data race properties over a Go program model, using the happens-before relation defined in the Go memory model. We represent these properties of programs in a μ-calculus model of types, and validate them using type-level model-checking. We then extend the framework to account for Go’s channels, and implement a static verification tool which can detect concurrency errors. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first static verification framework of this kind for the Go language, uniformly analysing concurrency errors caused by a mix of shared memory accesses and asynchronous message-passing communications.
Cite as

Julia Gabet and Nobuko Yoshida. Static Race Detection and Mutex Safety and Liveness for Go Programs. In 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 4:1-4:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gabet_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.4,
  author =	{Gabet, Julia and Yoshida, Nobuko},
  title =	{{Static Race Detection and Mutex Safety and Liveness for Go Programs}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:30},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131615},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Go language, behavioural types, race detection, happens-before relation, safety, liveness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.5
Reconciling Event Structures with Modern Multiprocessors

Authors: Evgenii Moiseenko, Anton Podkopaev, Ori Lahav, Orestis Melkonian, and Viktor Vafeiadis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract
Weakestmo is a recently proposed memory consistency model that uses event structures to resolve the infamous "out-of-thin-air" problem and to enable efficient compilation to hardware. Nevertheless, this latter property - compilation correctness - has not yet been formally established. This paper closes this gap by establishing correctness of the intended compilation schemes from Weakestmo to a wide range of formal hardware memory models (x86, POWER, ARMv7, ARMv8) in the Coq proof assistant. Our proof is the first that establishes correctness of compilation of an event-structure-based model that forbids "out-of-thin-air" behaviors, as well as the first mechanized compilation proof of a weak memory model supporting sequentially consistent accesses to such a range of hardware platforms. Our compilation proof goes via the recent Intermediate Memory Model (IMM), which we suitably extend with sequentially consistent accesses.
Cite as

Evgenii Moiseenko, Anton Podkopaev, Ori Lahav, Orestis Melkonian, and Viktor Vafeiadis. Reconciling Event Structures with Modern Multiprocessors. In 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 5:1-5:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{moiseenko_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.5,
  author =	{Moiseenko, Evgenii and Podkopaev, Anton and Lahav, Ori and Melkonian, Orestis and Vafeiadis, Viktor},
  title =	{{Reconciling Event Structures with Modern Multiprocessors}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131622},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Weak Memory Consistency, Event Structures, IMM, Weakestmo}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.6
Don't Panic! Better, Fewer, Syntax Errors for LR Parsers

Authors: Lukas Diekmann and Laurence Tratt

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract
Syntax errors are generally easy to fix for humans, but not for parsers in general nor LR parsers in particular. Traditional "panic mode" error recovery, though easy to implement and applicable to any grammar, often leads to a cascading chain of errors that drown out the original. More advanced error recovery techniques suffer less from this problem but have seen little practical use because their typical performance was seen as poor, their worst case unbounded, and the repairs they reported arbitrary. In this paper we introduce the CPCT+ algorithm, and an implementation of that algorithm, that address these issues. First, CPCT+ reports the complete set of minimum cost repair sequences for a given location, allowing programmers to select the one that best fits their intention. Second, on a corpus of 200,000 real-world syntactically invalid Java programs, CPCT+ is able to repair 98.37%±0.017% of files within a timeout of 0.5s. Finally, CPCT+ uses the complete set of minimum cost repair sequences to reduce the cascading error problem, where incorrect error recovery causes further spurious syntax errors to be identified. Across the test corpus, CPCT+ reports 435,812±473 error locations to the user, reducing the cascading error problem substantially relative to the 981,628±0 error locations reported by panic mode.
Cite as

Lukas Diekmann and Laurence Tratt. Don't Panic! Better, Fewer, Syntax Errors for LR Parsers. In 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 6:1-6:32, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{diekmann_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.6,
  author =	{Diekmann, Lukas and Tratt, Laurence},
  title =	{{Don't Panic! Better, Fewer, Syntax Errors for LR Parsers}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:32},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131630},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parsing, error recovery, programming languages}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.7
K-LLVM: A Relatively Complete Semantics of LLVM IR

Authors: Liyi Li and Elsa L. Gunter

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract
LLVM [Lattner and Adve, 2004] is designed for the compile-time, link-time and run-time optimization of programs written in various programming languages. The language supported by LLVM targeted by modern compilers is LLVM IR [llvm.org, 2018]. In this paper we define K-LLVM, a reference semantics for LLVM IR. To the best of our knowledge, K-LLVM is the most complete formal LLVM IR semantics to date, including all LLVM IR instructions, intrinsic functions in the LLVM documentation and Standard-C library functions that are necessary to execute many LLVM IR programs. Additionally, K-LLVM formulates an abstract machine that executes all LLVM IR instructions. The machine allows to describe our formal semantics in terms of simulating a conceptual virtual machine that runs LLVM IR programs, including non-deterministic programs. Even though the K-LLVM memory model in this paper is assumed to be a sequentially consistent memory model and does not include all LLVM concurrency memory behaviors, the design of K-LLVM’s data layout allows the K-LLVM abstract machine to execute some LLVM IR programs that previous semantics did not cover, such as the full range of LLVM IR behaviors for the interaction among LLVM IR casting, pointer arithmetic, memory operations and some memory flags (e.g. readonly) of function headers. Additionally, the memory model is modularized in a manner that supports investigating other memory models. To validate K-LLVM, we have implemented it in 𝕂 [Roşu, 2016], which generated an interpreter for LLVM IR. Using this, we ran tests including 1,385 unit test programs and around 3,000 concrete LLVM IR programs, and K-LLVM passed all of them.
Cite as

Liyi Li and Elsa L. Gunter. K-LLVM: A Relatively Complete Semantics of LLVM IR. In 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 7:1-7:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{li_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.7,
  author =	{Li, Liyi and Gunter, Elsa L.},
  title =	{{K-LLVM: A Relatively Complete Semantics of LLVM IR}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131649},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: LLVM, formal semantics, K framework, memory model, abstract machine}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 40 Document/PDF
  • 5 Document/HTML
  • 1 Volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 5 2025
  • 36 2020

  • Refine by Author
  • 4 Lhoták, Ondřej
  • 3 Donaldson, Alastair F.
  • 3 Hirschfeld, Robert
  • 3 Oliveira, Bruno C. d. S.
  • 2 Ancona, Davide
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 38 LIPIcs
  • 2 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 8 Theory of computation → Operational semantics
  • 5 Software and its engineering → General programming languages
  • 5 Software and its engineering → Object oriented languages
  • 5 Theory of computation → Type theory
  • 4 Software and its engineering → Compilers
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 4 type systems
  • 3 JavaScript
  • 2 Operational semantics
  • 2 coinduction
  • 2 nullability
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact