2 Search Results for "Ramakrishnan, Prasanna"


Document
Local Enumeration: The Not-All-Equal Case

Authors: Mohit Gurumukhani, Ramamohan Paturi, Michael Saks, and Navid Talebanfard

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)


Abstract
Gurumukhani et al. (CCC'24) proposed the local enumeration problem Enum(k, t) as an approach to break the Super Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SSETH): for a natural number k and a parameter t, given an n-variate k-CNF with no satisfying assignment of Hamming weight less than t(n), enumerate all satisfying assignments of Hamming weight exactly t(n). Furthermore, they gave a randomized algorithm for Enum(k, t) and employed new ideas to analyze the first non-trivial case, namely k = 3. In particular, they solved Enum(3, n/2) in expected 1.598ⁿ time. A simple construction shows a lower bound of 6^{n/4} ≈ 1.565ⁿ. In this paper, we show that to break SSETH, it is sufficient to consider a simpler local enumeration problem NAE-Enum(k, t): for a natural number k and a parameter t, given an n-variate k-CNF with no satisfying assignment of Hamming weight less than t(n), enumerate all Not-All-Equal (NAE) solutions of Hamming weight exactly t(n), i.e., those that satisfy and falsify some literal in every clause. We refine the algorithm of Gurumukhani et al. and show that it optimally solves NAE-Enum(3, n/2), namely, in expected time poly(n) ⋅ 6^{n/4}.

Cite as

Mohit Gurumukhani, Ramamohan Paturi, Michael Saks, and Navid Talebanfard. Local Enumeration: The Not-All-Equal Case. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 42:1-42:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gurumukhani_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.42,
  author =	{Gurumukhani, Mohit and Paturi, Ramamohan and Saks, Michael and Talebanfard, Navid},
  title =	{{Local Enumeration: The Not-All-Equal Case}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{42:1--42:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.42},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228680},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.42},
  annote =	{Keywords: Depth 3 circuits, k-CNF satisfiability, Circuit lower bounds, Majority function}
}
Document
The Composition Complexity of Majority

Authors: Victor Lecomte, Prasanna Ramakrishnan, and Li-Yang Tan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 234, 37th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2022)


Abstract
We study the complexity of computing majority as a composition of local functions: Maj_n = h(g_1,…,g_m), where each g_j: {0,1}ⁿ → {0,1} is an arbitrary function that queries only k ≪ n variables and h: {0,1}^m → {0,1} is an arbitrary combining function. We prove an optimal lower bound of m ≥ Ω(n/k log k) on the number of functions needed, which is a factor Ω(log k) larger than the ideal m = n/k. We call this factor the composition overhead; previously, no superconstant lower bounds on it were known for majority. Our lower bound recovers, as a corollary and via an entirely different proof, the best known lower bound for bounded-width branching programs for majority (Alon and Maass '86, Babai et al. '90). It is also the first step in a plan that we propose for breaking a longstanding barrier in lower bounds for small-depth boolean circuits. Novel aspects of our proof include sharp bounds on the information lost as computation flows through the inner functions g_j, and the bootstrapping of lower bounds for a multi-output function (Hamming weight) into lower bounds for a single-output one (majority).

Cite as

Victor Lecomte, Prasanna Ramakrishnan, and Li-Yang Tan. The Composition Complexity of Majority. In 37th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 234, pp. 19:1-19:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lecomte_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2022.19,
  author =	{Lecomte, Victor and Ramakrishnan, Prasanna and Tan, Li-Yang},
  title =	{{The Composition Complexity of Majority}},
  booktitle =	{37th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2022)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-241-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{234},
  editor =	{Lovett, Shachar},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2022.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-165818},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2022.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: computational complexity, circuit lower bounds}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 2 Document/PDF
  • 1 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2025
  • 1 2022

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Gurumukhani, Mohit
  • 1 Lecomte, Victor
  • 1 Paturi, Ramamohan
  • 1 Ramakrishnan, Prasanna
  • 1 Saks, Michael
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 2 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Circuit complexity

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Circuit lower bounds
  • 1 Depth 3 circuits
  • 1 Majority function
  • 1 circuit lower bounds
  • 1 computational complexity
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail