2 Search Results for "Zabarnyi, Konstantin"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.50
Designing Exploration Contracts

Authors: Martin Hoefer, Conrad Schecker, and Kevin Schewior

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
We study a natural application of contract design in the context of sequential exploration problems. In our principal-agent setting, a search task is delegated to an agent. The agent performs a sequential exploration of n boxes, suffers the exploration cost for each inspected box, and selects the content (called the prize) of one inspected box as outcome. Agent and principal obtain an individual value based on the selected prize. To influence the search, the principal a-priori designs a contract with a non-negative payment to the agent for each potential prize. The goal of the principal is to maximize her expected reward, i.e., value minus payment. Interestingly, this natural contract scenario shares close relations with the Pandora’s Box problem. We show how to compute optimal contracts for the principal in several scenarios. A popular and important subclass is that of linear contracts, and we show how to compute optimal linear contracts in polynomial time. For general contracts, we obtain optimal contracts under the standard assumption that the agent suffers cost but obtains value only from the transfers by the principal. More generally, for general contracts with non-zero agent values for outcomes we show how to compute an optimal contract in two cases: (1) when each box has only one prize with non-zero value for principal and agent, (2) for i.i.d. boxes with a single prize with positive value for the principal.
Cite as

Martin Hoefer, Conrad Schecker, and Kevin Schewior. Designing Exploration Contracts. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 50:1-50:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hoefer_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.50,
  author =	{Hoefer, Martin and Schecker, Conrad and Schewior, Kevin},
  title =	{{Designing Exploration Contracts}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{50:1--50:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.50},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228755},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.50},
  annote =	{Keywords: Exploration, Contract Design, Pandora’s Box Problem}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.11
Multi-Channel Bayesian Persuasion

Authors: Yakov Babichenko, Inbal Talgam-Cohen, Haifeng Xu, and Konstantin Zabarnyi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 215, 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)

Abstract
The celebrated Bayesian persuasion model considers strategic communication between an informed agent (the sender) and uninformed decision makers (the receivers). The current rapidly-growing literature assumes a dichotomy: either the sender is powerful enough to communicate separately with each receiver (a.k.a. private persuasion), or she cannot communicate separately at all (a.k.a. public persuasion). We propose a model that smoothly interpolates between the two, by introducing a natural multi-channel communication structure in which each receiver observes a subset of the sender’s communication channels. This captures, e.g., receivers on a network, where information spillover is almost inevitable. Our main result is a complete characterization specifying when one communication structure is better for the sender than another, in the sense of yielding higher optimal expected utility universally over all prior distributions and utility functions. The characterization is based on a simple pairwise relation among receivers - one receiver information-dominates another if he observes at least the same channels. We prove that a communication structure M₁ is (weakly) better than M₂ if and only if every information-dominating pair of receivers in M₁ is also such in M₂. This result holds in the most general model of Bayesian persuasion in which receivers may have externalities - that is, the receivers' actions affect each other. The proof is cryptographic-inspired and it has a close conceptual connection to secret sharing protocols. As a surprising consequence of the main result, the sender can implement private Bayesian persuasion (which is the best communication structure for the sender) for k receivers using only O(log k) communication channels, rather than k channels in the naive implementation. We provide an implementation that matches the information-theoretical lower bound on the number of channels - not only asymptotically, but exactly. Moreover, the main result immediately implies some results of [Kerman and Tenev, 2021] on persuading receivers arranged in a network such that each receiver observes both the signals sent to him and to his neighbours in the network. We further provide an additive FPTAS for an optimal sender’s signaling scheme when the number of states of nature is constant, the sender has an additive utility function and the graph of the information-dominating pairs of receivers is a directed forest. We focus on a constant number of states, as even for the special case of public persuasion and additive sender’s utility, it was shown by [Shaddin Dughmi and Haifeng Xu, 2017] that one can achieve neither an additive PTAS nor a polynomial-time constant-factor optimal sender’s utility approximation (unless P=NP). We leave for future research studying exact tractability of forest communication structures, as well as generalizing our result to more families of sender’s utility functions and communication structures. Finally, we prove that finding an optimal signaling scheme under multi-channel persuasion is computationally hard for a general family of sender’s utility functions - separable supermajority functions, which are specified by choosing a partition of the set of receivers and summing supermajority functions corresponding to different elements of the partition, multiplied by some non-negative constants. Note that one can easily deduce from [Emir Kamenica and Matthew Gentzkow, 2011] and [Itai Arieli and Yakov Babichenko, 2019] that finding an optimal signaling scheme for such utility functions is computationally tractable for both public and private persuasion. This difference illustrates both the conceptual and the computational hardness of general multi-channel persuasion.
Cite as

Yakov Babichenko, Inbal Talgam-Cohen, Haifeng Xu, and Konstantin Zabarnyi. Multi-Channel Bayesian Persuasion. In 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 215, pp. 11:1-11:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{babichenko_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.11,
  author =	{Babichenko, Yakov and Talgam-Cohen, Inbal and Xu, Haifeng and Zabarnyi, Konstantin},
  title =	{{Multi-Channel Bayesian Persuasion}},
  booktitle =	{13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:2},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-217-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{215},
  editor =	{Braverman, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-156072},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algorithmic game theory, Bayesian persuasion, Private Bayesian persuasion, Public Bayesian persuasion, Secret sharing, Networks}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 2 Document/PDF
  • 1 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2025
  • 1 2022

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Babichenko, Yakov
  • 1 Hoefer, Martin
  • 1 Schecker, Conrad
  • 1 Schewior, Kevin
  • 1 Talgam-Cohen, Inbal
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 2 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Theory of computation → Algorithmic game theory
  • 1 Theory of computation → Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Algorithmic game theory
  • 1 Bayesian persuasion
  • 1 Contract Design
  • 1 Exploration
  • 1 Networks
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact