4 Search Results for "Casacuberta, Sílvia"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20
Privacy, Prediction, and Allocation

Authors: Ben Jacobsen and Nitin Kohli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
Algorithmic predictions are increasingly used to inform the allocation of scarce resources. The promise of these methods is that, through machine learning, they can better identify the people who would benefit most from interventions. Recently, however, several works have called this assumption into question by demonstrating the existence of settings where simple, unit-level allocation strategies can meet or even exceed the performance of those based on individual-level targeting. Separately, other works have objected to individual-level targeting on privacy grounds, leading to an unusual situation where a single solution, unit-level targeting, is recommended for reasons of both privacy and utility. Motivated by the desire to fully understand the interplay of privacy and targeting levels, we initiate the study of aid allocation systems that satisfy differential privacy, synthesizing existing works on private optimization with the economic models of aid allocation used in the non-private literature. To this end, we investigate private variants of both individual and unit-level allocation strategies in both stochastic and distribution-free settings under a range of constraints on data availability. Through this analysis, we provide clean, interpretable bounds characterizing the tradeoffs between privacy, efficiency, and targeting precision in allocation.
Cite as

Ben Jacobsen and Nitin Kohli. Privacy, Prediction, and Allocation. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 20:1-20:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jacobsen_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20,
  author =	{Jacobsen, Ben and Kohli, Nitin},
  title =	{{Privacy, Prediction, and Allocation}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259935},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential privacy, fair allocation, limits of prediction}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.19
Characterizing the Distinguishability of Product Distributions Through Multicalibration

Authors: Cassandra Marcussen, Aaron Putterman, and Salil Vadhan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
Given a sequence of samples x_1, … , x_k promised to be drawn from one of two distributions X₀, X₁, a well-studied problem in statistics is to decide which distribution the samples are from. Information theoretically, the maximum advantage in distinguishing the two distributions given k samples is captured by the total variation distance between X₀^{⊗k} and X₁^{⊗k}. However, when we restrict our attention to efficient distinguishers (i.e., small circuits) of these two distributions, exactly characterizing the ability to distinguish X₀^{⊗k} and X₁^{⊗k} is more involved and less understood. In this work, we give a general way to reduce bounds on the computational indistinguishability of X₀ and X₁ to bounds on the information-theoretic indistinguishability of some specific, related variables X̃₀ and X̃₁. As a consequence, we prove a new, tight characterization of the number of samples k needed to efficiently distinguish X₀^{⊗k} and X₁^{⊗k} with constant advantage as k = Θ(d_H^{-2}(X̃₀, X̃₁)), which is the inverse of the squared Hellinger distance d_H between two distributions X̃₀ and X̃₁ that are computationally indistinguishable from X₀ and X₁. Likewise, our framework can be used to re-derive a result of Halevi and Rabin (TCC 2008) and Geier (TCC 2022), proving nearly-tight bounds on how computational indistinguishability scales with the number of samples for arbitrary product distributions. At the heart of our work is the use of the Multicalibration Theorem (Hébert-Johnson, Kim, Reingold, Rothblum 2018) in a way inspired by recent work of Casacuberta, Dwork, and Vadhan (STOC 2024). Multicalibration allows us to relate the computational indistinguishability of X₀, X₁ to the statistical indistinguishability of X̃₀, X̃₁ (for lower bounds on k) and construct explicit circuits to distinguish between X̃₀, X̃₁ and consequently X₀, X₁ (for upper bounds on k).
Cite as

Cassandra Marcussen, Aaron Putterman, and Salil Vadhan. Characterizing the Distinguishability of Product Distributions Through Multicalibration. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 19:1-19:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{marcussen_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.19,
  author =	{Marcussen, Cassandra and Putterman, Aaron and Vadhan, Salil},
  title =	{{Characterizing the Distinguishability of Product Distributions Through Multicalibration}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237130},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Multicalibration, computational distinguishability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.22
When Does a Predictor Know Its Own Loss?

Authors: Aravind Gollakota, Parikshit Gopalan, Aayush Karan, Charlotte Peale, and Udi Wieder

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)

Abstract
Given a predictor and a loss function, how well can we predict the loss that the predictor will incur on an input? This is the problem of loss prediction, a key computational task associated with uncertainty estimation for a predictor. In a classification setting, a predictor will typically predict a distribution over labels and hence have its own estimate of the loss that it will incur, given by the entropy of the predicted distribution. Should we trust this estimate? In other words, when does the predictor know what it knows and what it does not know? In this work we study the theoretical foundations of loss prediction. Our main contribution is to establish tight connections between nontrivial loss prediction and certain forms of multicalibration [Ursula Hébert-Johnson et al., 2018], a multigroup fairness notion that asks for calibrated predictions across computationally identifiable subgroups. Formally, we show that a loss predictor that is able to improve on the self-estimate of a predictor yields a witness to a failure of multicalibration, and vice versa. This has the implication that nontrivial loss prediction is in effect no easier or harder than auditing for multicalibration. We support our theoretical results with experiments that show a robust positive correlation between the multicalibration error of a predictor and the efficacy of training a loss predictor.
Cite as

Aravind Gollakota, Parikshit Gopalan, Aayush Karan, Charlotte Peale, and Udi Wieder. When Does a Predictor Know Its Own Loss?. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 22:1-22:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gollakota_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.22,
  author =	{Gollakota, Aravind and Gopalan, Parikshit and Karan, Aayush and Peale, Charlotte and Wieder, Udi},
  title =	{{When Does a Predictor Know Its Own Loss?}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231490},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: loss prediction, multicalibration, active learning, algorithmic fairness, calibration, predictive uncertainty, uncertainty estimation, machine learning theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.33
Faster Sparse Matrix Inversion and Rank Computation in Finite Fields

Authors: Sílvia Casacuberta and Rasmus Kyng

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 215, 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)

Abstract
We improve the current best running time value to invert sparse matrices over finite fields, lowering it to an expected O(n^{2.2131}) time for the current values of fast rectangular matrix multiplication. We achieve the same running time for the computation of the rank and nullspace of a sparse matrix over a finite field. This improvement relies on two key techniques. First, we adopt the decomposition of an arbitrary matrix into block Krylov and Hankel matrices from Eberly et al. (ISSAC 2007). Second, we show how to recover the explicit inverse of a block Hankel matrix using low displacement rank techniques for structured matrices and fast rectangular matrix multiplication algorithms. We generalize our inversion method to block structured matrices with other displacement operators and strengthen the best known upper bounds for explicit inversion of block Toeplitz-like and block Hankel-like matrices, as well as for explicit inversion of block Vandermonde-like matrices with structured blocks. As a further application, we improve the complexity of several algorithms in topological data analysis and in finite group theory.
Cite as

Sílvia Casacuberta and Rasmus Kyng. Faster Sparse Matrix Inversion and Rank Computation in Finite Fields. In 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 215, pp. 33:1-33:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{casacuberta_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.33,
  author =	{Casacuberta, S{\'\i}lvia and Kyng, Rasmus},
  title =	{{Faster Sparse Matrix Inversion and Rank Computation in Finite Fields}},
  booktitle =	{13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-217-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{215},
  editor =	{Braverman, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-156290},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Matrix inversion, rank computation, displacement operators, numerical linear algebra}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 4 Document/PDF
  • 3 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 2 2025
  • 1 2022

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Casacuberta, Sílvia
  • 1 Gollakota, Aravind
  • 1 Gopalan, Parikshit
  • 1 Jacobsen, Ben
  • 1 Karan, Aayush
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 4 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Security and privacy → Human and societal aspects of security and privacy
  • 1 Theory of computation → Circuit complexity
  • 1 Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms
  • 1 Theory of computation → Machine learning theory

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Differential privacy
  • 1 Matrix inversion
  • 1 Multicalibration
  • 1 active learning
  • 1 algorithmic fairness
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact